He also had a tendency to talk over women and interrupt before letting them finish.
Because women can talk BS for hours, and they often do not know when to finish. Waffling on and on about nothing or their feelings.
--
e debated were very young and with limited life experience.
He debated students for the most part. Also, they were volunteering, believing they were full of knowledge to the brim and ready to take on any challenge. He proved them wrong, which ultimately benefited them. He also debated with anyone-those clips can be found too.
It's not as if he chose weak opponents for a reason. Let's flip it: if you are weak, you should know your place. A fair place is not contending in the real world; it's only your experience with women's privilege that misled you.
--
think Charlie Kirk was only attractive to neophytes and people generally not very sophisticated.
Is that your way of saying that he wasn't elitist and had a common touch with regular people? Is that a good thing in the US?
After all, nobody argued he was a titan of intellect and larger than life sage.