The BEST Guide to POLAND
Unanswered  |  Archives [3] 
  
Account: Guest

Home / News  % width   posts: 767

Poland's aid to Ukraine if Russia invades - part 21


Paulina  19 | 4612
7 hrs ago   #751
Zelensky doesnt mention anything like a peace deal.

Eh? Did you see RuSSia's conditions? "The demilitarization of Ukraine"? Are you f*cking kidding me??? lol 🤦
PolAmKrakow  2 | 907
7 hrs ago   #752
@Paulina
The key point is no NATO, and Russia will get that. Everything else is a somewhat soft position.

Trump never gave a two weekk notice before. He said that he would not wait much longer. And I hope he does not. Both Russia and Ukraine are completely unreasonable in some of their demands.
jon357  72 | 23649
6 hrs ago   #753
Are you f*cking kidding me?

That's what he's doing. It's a sign of desperation. He knows it won't go his way so he's making maximalist demands to try and save face. He won't get any of the things on his list and there is no reason he should.

One of the sillier demands is for the arrest warrants to be cancelled. Yet trumpet's country isn't even a participant in the International Court of Justice and therefore have no way of agreeing or offering that, and of course the court isn't party to any negotiations or subject to political control.
cms neuf  2 | 1926
6 hrs ago   #754
Golden Cow also says they want to concentrate on solving other global problems - but they screw up anything they touch.

Why doesn't he concentrate on the things he wants to do in America and leave the rest of the world in peace
mafketis  38 | 11319
6 hrs ago   #755
Both Russia and Ukraine

'both sides' crap doesn't work when there is a clearn, unambiguous aggressor and a clear, unambiguous defender...
Bobko  28 | 2242
6 hrs ago   #756
"The demilitarization of Ukraine"? Are you f*cking kidding me??? lol 🤦

What's the big deal?

Who's Ukraine planning on attacking in the future? Slovakia? Maybe Hungary, or Moldova?

I think... and this is just my opinion - that Ukraine wants to maintain a large military so that it is able to fight Russia.

At the same time, even Zelensky says - "the way out of this conflict lies in diplomacy, and not the military dimension".

So what's the difference - whether you have a military or not? If Russia violates all agreements and reinvades, I'm sure the West will again flood Ukraine with weapons. So many weapons, that it will make whatever Ukraine produced in the interwar period look like a drop in the ocean. Again Kiev will mobilize men and turbo charge conscription.

If Ukraine ever has to fight Russia in a second iteration of this war, then it will be well aided - don't have to be a genius to predict this.

So why does it need to maintain a huge army in the interim? I think... and again this is just my opinion - that they will use it to claw back territories in the same way they did during Minsk I and II.

Kinda like Azerbaijan, Armenia, and Karabakh. Why did Azerbaijan need a massive army, if it was not to violate the Karabakh ceasefire and try to take that territory back from Armenia through force? No reason! So at the end of the day, it is exactly what happened.
PolAmKrakow  2 | 907
5 hrs ago   #757
@cms neuf
As soon as the rest of the world stops asking the US to keep funding this bvllshit I am sure he will focus solely on the US. But as long as everyone keeps crying about democracy and the US "has to" do this or that, your argument is really a nothingburger.

@mafketis
Aggresor like people on PF attacking people and others defending themselves? Right. How about Ukraine not keeping with the Minsk accords? Or maybe Zelensky running for office as a peace maker and then not being one? While Putin should not be trusted, neither should Ukraine.
cms neuf  2 | 1926
5 hrs ago   #758
But the rest of the world is not asking for that. As you have been told many times, the EU and other countries have spent just as much on aid and weapons as the US. And they haven't asked for all of Ukraine's minerals in perpetuity either.

Listening to the US whining is become tiresome for everybody.
jon357  72 | 23649
4 hrs ago   #759
so that it is able to fight

So that they are able to defend.

Something that anyone with eyes can see is badly needed, given they are currently being invaded by a hostile country with an appalling record of carrying out atrocities.

So what's the difference - whether you have a military or not?

Do you need to ask that?

And if it makes no difference, why doesn't r*SSia demilitarise?
Bobko  28 | 2242
4 hrs ago   #760
why doesn't r*SSia demilitarise?

Because we are afraid of the Yanks.
Paulina  19 | 4612
4 hrs ago   #761
So what's the difference - whether you have a military or not?

Bobko, you pretending to be as intellectually, mentally and emotionally retarded as Novichok won't convince anyone. Please, don't even waste my time with this humongous pile of ridiculous bullsh1t *sigh* 💩💩💩💩💩💩💩
Bobko  28 | 2242
3 hrs ago   #762
you pretending to be as intellectually, mentally and emotionally retarded as Novichok

Rich is a very smart man. No man can do what he did, and not be smart.

Please do not involve me in your intrigues.
Paulina  19 | 4612
3 hrs ago   #763
@Bobko, those are not any "intrigues". If you choose to behave like a deliberately obtuse moron then expect being treated as such.
mafketis  38 | 11319
3 hrs ago   #764
How about

How about you stop repeating MAGA talking points that are warmed over russian propaganda and lies....

russia does not want peace.... at all, if the war stops with Ukraine it will start somewhere else, probably another ex-soviet country (not the baltics.... yet though those are on the schedule)

What on earth makes you think that russia wants peace?
Torq  11 | 1175
3 hrs ago   #765
So what's the difference - whether you have a military or not?

Cunning but a bit too obvious.

If Ukraine disbands its military, then in case of war there is no way they will be able to call up enough men to arms quickly enough, so the current defensive line would be lost immediately, and constructing another in the chaos of invasion and countrywide mobilization would be near impossible. That's why Ukraine needs a standing army and the current frontline defensive positions to be manned by adequate forces, not to attack Russia but to defend.

russia does not want peace...

Of course they don't. They are increasing weapons production, recreating wartime military districts and commands, and already started propaganda machine depicting the EU as Nazis (remember the recent Lavrov's ramblings?). From Russia's point of view ending the war now doesn't make any sense. MAGA idiots want to make the biggest mistake one can ever make with Russia - give them передышка.

The only way out of this situation would be to mobilize conventional European NATO armies (and I mean common mass mobilisation) ASAP and simultaneously enter Królewiec, Belarus and Ukraine (with secondary operations in Murmansk, Karelia, Pskov and Leningrad Oblasts). If the United Stated controlled the nuclear escalation (and I don't think gold toilet sh*tters want to live under ground like rats for the rest of their lives), then the blitzkrieg would last 3-4 months and it would be all over. Properly democratic government would be installed in Moscow and era of peace and prosperity would come. However, this won't happen with agent Trumpov in the White House.

So, more European NATO countries need to develop their own nukes (Finland, Germany, Poland and Romania for a start), so that we can control the escalation ourselves. This would also allow to free ourselves from American domination and emerge as the greatest world superpower. Hahahahahahaha (sinister laugh from horrors).
Crow  155 | 9747
57 mins ago   #766
Did Poland finally decided to stand with Hungary and Serbia? Finally?
mafketis  38 | 11319
49 mins ago   #767
Poland finally decided to stand with Hungary and Serbia? Finally?

..no.


Home / News / Poland's aid to Ukraine if Russia invades - part 21

Please login to post here!