In a a country where abortions are banned EXCEPT in the case of rape, the burden of proof that it was rape is on the woman since it is she who claims it and is the petitioner.
Proving rape does not need to meet the beyond-a-reasonable-doubt rule since nobody is on trial. We are only talking about allowing her doctor to abort. More-likely-than-not is sufficient.
A woman who is in her 20th week of pregnancy CANNOT claim rape. Duh! She is lying. The ultimate lie: He molested me 30 years ago...boo hoo...Sure...Bi*tch...
A raped woman calls the cops or goes to the nearest hospital as soon as she is physically capable...Anything else is bullshlt...
In the state of Michigan as late as 1959, a blood test, a simple swab on a slide worked up by any intern at a hospital, was deemed by State Court sufficient in proving rape!!
So the state of Michigan was WRONG???! Come on, dude.
Charlie Kirk was a convinced Neocon, but also known for racist, disparaging remarks about, among others, George Floyd!
Albeit Floyd might not have been a model citizen, he was nonetheless entitled to the same respect as any other citizen, white or black.
If this seems drearily old-fashioned, lefty, and somehow out of touch with life during the Trump anti-Revolution, then I suppose humanity too is out of date.
Hitler as well declared war on law without order, on equality and all the other verities your kind loves to sneer at.
Essentially you and other Trumpers are nothing more than anti-Christian.
Charlie Kirk was a convinced Neocon, but also known for racist, disparaging remarks about, among others, George Floyd!
Your kind, commie liberal kind with your nonsense and with your lack of brains belongs to the past. Your chirping here on some obscure forums has no impact whatsoever on real life. The future of reality belongs to people like Charlie.