Abortion still under control in Poland - part 2

There is no sperm flush out.
Ergo, a women can still get pregnant

OK, Wrong term. EC it is...

Here is the sequence:

1. Rape
2. 911
3. Hospital

... all in less than one hour. No pregnancy to abort and no need for "abortion rights".

What is EC. Do you mean emergency contraception aka morning after pill?

As far as I'm aware there is no procedure that can efficiently remove sperm once it enters vagina.

My point #5 covers that. If there's no "sperm flush out" they can try a day after pill or whatever they wish.

I just wanted to straighten that misconception. And quite scary really the bs being spread.

Not to mention the emergency contraception is in the bad book of any anti abortion people

I'm glad you agree with the remaining 95% of my post.

Now that is a fact !

They do use a spermicide flush (dooch) that kills the baby paste but you better hope the the hell that the sperm that got past the goalie hasn't reached the egg yet.
And since a normal sperm count ranges from 15 million to over 200 million sperm per milliliter of semen, what could possibly go wrong. :-/

Oh Novi, what U-tube did you take that from ?
If a guy my size is balls deep into it pressing against her cervix with his one eyed snake in launch mode it ain't gonna take no hour to reach the cervix which at that point is too late to stop fertilization.
At least that is what the Nuns taught us in third grade anyways.

Spermicide are used before sex as a contraceptive.
Can you please provide me with any information about the after sex flush out version?

Yes, that is what I meant and admittedly worded it wrong.
I am not a pro on this subject as I always just pulled and prayed.

Quoting:
The question many individuals have is: "Can I use spermicide after intercourse?" The short answer is no; using spermicide after intercourse does not provide any benefit for preventing pregnancy. Once ejaculation occurs and sperm are deposited in the vagina, they can swim rapidly toward the egg within minutes. (Hear that Novi ?)
Applying spermicide afterward cannot reverse this action.

Moreover, using spermicide post-intercourse can lead to irritation or discomfort without providing any contraceptive benefits. It's essential to understand that once sexual activity has taken place, the opportunity for prevention through spermicide has passed.
The Lord only knows how glad I am that I am to old to fret about such things anymore.

EC is effective for 7 days.


I don't know how EC works but works.

Fertilization - yes, Pregnancy + baby - no. Not yet...

yes, any birth control that takes place after conception is seen as murder by many/most anti-abortion people, the term they use is 'abortifacient'....

see here:

studentsforlife.org/learn/contraception/

So presumably those who want rapists' babies to be born are equally opposed to IUDs, birth control pills*, 'morning after' pills and late term abortion.... which I personally think is kind of crazy....

It's as crazy as calling Trump or Putin Hitler...It perverts the meaning of these words into nothing.

The cleanest case of legalized murder is abortion past heart beat. Anything before that is just disgusting and immoral.

Quoting:

12-latka z bólem brzucha trafiła do szpitala. Okazało się, że jest w ciąży. Ojcem ma być 16-letni brat.

A 12-year-old girl was taken to the hospital with abdominal pain. It turned out she was pregnant. The father was believed to be her 16-year-old brother.

Should she get an abortion when they found out she was pregnant?

Do you see Johnny? This is how they prefer to engage in discussions. We will talk about the gruesome and murderous procedure of late-term abortion, and they will respond with claims about opposition to the morning-after pill from so-called heartless conservatives, even though you would need a powerful telescope to find such conservatives in reality.

On the other hand, they never initiate a conversation about the real issue: a Virginia politician, who happens to be a medical doctor, was asked by a reporter what should be done with a survivor of an abortion who is alive outside the birth canal. The progressive politician offered his solution for dealing with this inconvenient situation: first, he said, you make the victim warm and comfortable, then you kill it, conveniently ignoring the Hippocratic Oath. What a swine.

These are the rational people you engage with in discussions.

What's the difference between killing a child in the school or in the womb?

Killing a child in school takes the life of an innocent, living
being who is aware someone is trying to take their life!

A fetus essentially is not a formed being, rather like pondering
whether or not an algae plant can scream if picked up in a bucket
and washed away.

You weren't present at the beginning of Creation and neither was
anyone here.

Pro-abortion leftists always tell us what "a fetus" is not, but not what it is.

Here is the definition:

Fetus - an alive human being inside a pregnant woman

Your turn...

Just like killing the same innocent child in its mother's womb.


Oh, so being aware is the deciding factor. Interesting.

So, what if the murderer approaches the child at school quietly and shoots it in the back of the head, so that at no moment is the child aware that "someone is trying to take their life"?

You people (pro-abortionists) are seriously f*cked up in the head.

The Jew just told you that it's OK to shoot him when he is asleep.

No, I merely argue that Torq, you, and so many others, think robotically,
not logically or scientifically. You follow blindly, like lemmings. It's the same for any unthinking ideology,
be it Orthodox Judaism (including the various extreme sects, Satmar,
for example) or Roman Catholicism!!

Abortion has nothing to do with any religion. It has to do with the tribe's sustainability.

A country with a 1.4 rep rate should not allow any except when the woman's physical life is in danger. Emergency contraception is not abortion enough to have a fist fight about.

If the US made abortions free for blacks, would it be discrimination against blacks or whites?

The same question for Ukrainians in Poland...

Logically and scientifically like justifying murder by the fact that the victim wasn't "aware someone was trying to take their life"?

Face it, Lyzko - you're a retard.

OK, propose your logical abortion rules.

How about you, Feniks? You do have an opinion on what abortion laws should be where you live, right?


You just insulted real retards.

Ck. out Stanley Kramer's "Inherit The Wind" (1961),
the year Tracy won an Oscar for his role of Henry Drummond (Clarence Darrow),
having been beaten out one year earlier by Maximillian Schell in "Judgement at Nueremberg".

The former's all about the right to teach evolution in the state of Tennessee.
Those boneheads applied the same (il)logic about Darwin as you guys do
concerning a woman's right to choose.

Nope.
Tracy's oscars were back in the 1930s.

He was nominated in 1960 (inherit the wind) but lost best actor to Burt Lancaster - elmer gantry
He and Schell were both nominated in 1961 for JaN but Schell won.

Thanks for the correction, maf!
Tracy deserved the Oscar for "Inherit the Wind", HANDS DOWN!!
Admittedly, Schell gave the best performance in "Judgement",
(in my opinion, way superior to Lancaster's uncharactaristically
stilted and over the top exaggerated take on the Janning part),
....but Spence had all the best lines:-)

Hey, Lyzko, are you working on your abortion rules or did you decide to ignore my polite request?

Abortion "rules" as it were apply naturally ONLY in cases of rape or incest.
Here, we must show leniency!!

How would you know that it was "rape"? Because she said so after 20 weeks of pregnancy?

Men who trust women should not be allowed to reproduce.