Are Polish Women very promiscuous towards foreigners and refugees?

But you didn't invent unflattering aspects out of thin air... the idea that sexual coercion was a basic or common part of life in the PRL is just without foundation.

Did it happen.... some for sure. Was it a pervasive or common pattern or more common than in the US at the same time? No.

You've lost since you haven't presented any kind of credible evidence.

"Trafiła kosa na kamień" then, because I can be tireless if needs be :), and I won't let Lyzko get away with writing bullsh1t.


LOL 🤦

Lyzko, what you're doing right now is called "gaslighting".

We're not being "defensive", we're telling you the truth. And you not only refuse to accept the truth from people who know more about life in communist Poland than you do, but you also started simply lying.

Do you have no shame?

Makes me wonder whether you're generally lying in this thread. If you didn't lie then you should have no problem with answering my 4 simple questions:

https://polishforums.com/life/women-promiscuous-towards-foreigners-refugees-81405/6/#msg1919195

Answer them, please.

☝️

@Paulina
You know you are dealing with a troll. ?

That was the subject, not prostitution.

Calling prostitutes "sex workers" is like calling rats "pets". Prostitutes are worse than rats. They spread diseases, buy illegal drugs, add to the urban blight, drain police resources, and on and on... Somehow, they seldom look like Pretty Woman.

As I said, any man with AIDS who has sex with a woman, prostitute or not, should be shot.

@Paulina,
I know what you mean, Gregory!
LOL

I don't think Lyzko is trolling (he's not that type). I think there's something wrong with him... He's not behaving like a normal person would. Maybe he's a toxic person or sth. I had some objections concerning his behaviour in the past, but I would usually give it a rest, because it was often minor stuff. But this time I decided to dig deeper and... woah... it really came out in this thread... 😳


Still no answers to my questions?
Is Ironside right about you, Lyzko? Are you trolling? Because you defenitely don't behave like a responsible adult.

Lyzko, why won't you answer my 4 simple questions?

And they pay high taxes, at least in Germany.

They still are spreaders...who pay taxes.
Were they exempt from the covid rules or placed on welfare?


Lyzko, don't answer. This is not a police investigation.
If you are curious, you can google it, Paulina.

If he doesn't answer those 4 questions, it will mean he was making stuff up. That will mean he's a spineless liar. It's up to him if he wants to be seen as such or not.


I'm not asking him about some kind of general information that can be googled. I'm asking him about his personal experience in case you haven't noticed.

...only to claim that he lied. Been there...
Lyzko is smart enough to know that such conversations never end - even if he posted unimpeachable evidence. Photoshopped!!! Sounds familiar?

No, I don't automatically assume that he would be lying. He could give dishonest, made up answers to my 4 questions many times already, but he didn't. It think it probably means that Lyzko has some remnants of human decency.

The thing is, if he didn't exaggerate, he would simply answer those 4 questions right away instead of repeating the same general claims and accusations about us over and over again. The fact that he was stalling like that made me suspicious.


That is simply not true. If he posted unimpeachable evidence then it would be different.

And in case you haven't noticed Lyzko repeatedly discarded our knowledge about PRL and our experience, which, I think it's pretty obvious by now, surpasses his. So, that's like the pot calling the kettle black.

What make you say that? He is a troll. Why do you care so much about his posts?
Sounds to me he had/has diffculty to get laid and all he has left are his Phantasy Star Online 2 to console himself. Talking on PF does it too for him. Troll with sex issues that Lyzko to the T.

...and you would be the judge if the evidence was unimpeachable?
On forums like this one, when A posts, B has one bite at it. Period.

Because he didn't strike me as a troll before.


What is an "unimpeachable evidence" according to you?

It's the evidence that survived a court hearing with both parties in agreement and testifying under oath and fear of going to prison for lying.

All else is suspect.

@Novichok, for me it would be enough (to at least question my knowledge about that period) if Lyzko posted a link to an article in a reputable newspaper, if he quoted excerpts from a book written by a serious, renowned historian, if he gave us a title of a documentary made by a reputable TV station.

Even if Lyzko answered my 4 questions right away at least that would make him more trustworthy in my eyes. But he didn't. He didn't answer them repeatedly.


Why do you claim then that Lyzko is being "smart" by not answering some basic questions? You don't know if he's being smart or a liar or someone who exaggarated and is too much of a coward to admit that he was wrong.

@Maf, as soon as I hear back from that fellow I mentioned to you in my private mail just now, the verdict will be out. Should it turn out that I'm wrong, then I will publically apologize in open forum to the entire group.