Why is women-hatred and stereotyping so popular in Poland?

...and, if I may add, if it's a different solution than in case of a minus-one-hour-baby (one hour before birth), then why is it different?

Hey, GK, you are a bad, bad boy....I have been setting this trap so patiently and you just tripped it...

Yeah...What's the difference between the +1 baby and -1 baby? At what point does the vagina bestow personhood on that baby? Or is it the clitoris?

:)

You're too cruel, Novi. People's idiocy has to be shown to them in a gentle, sympathetic way. Otherwise they will pout and refuse to accept reality.

Cruel is my middle name...I like to do it in steps...like a cat that plays with a mouse before the kill.

The problem I am running into is that leftists can't last more than three questions. Some see danger and run.

A recent example...I asked a legislative assistant if her boss (a leftist Muslim!) would vote for a bill that would ban men from entering where women take showers.

She: This is a complex issue...

Me: Would you mind a strange guy with a big dick next to you?

Silence.

God knows I didn't mean for that conversation to end so fast.

Which people that advocate such rules (and it's not that many) it's the part that +1 baby isn't in somebody's else body.

Depends how strange he was...

I asked for the difference between Baby +1 and Baby -1.
Let me help you ... Are those two babies alive human beings?

If yes, the location is irrelevant. Or if you can see it or not.

It's very relevant.
We don't force people to donate Blood or organs even when it can save a life. But we do force women to be unwillingly carry a baby.

That being said I'm not a supporter of late abortions beside medical issues

You need a better definition of "force". Indifference or doing nothing is not force.

BTW, I do appreciate that you didn't call Baby -1 a "fetus".

We say here in the States, the religious Right loves the fetus, but hates the child:-)

It has to be in the Top 10 most idiotic things I've ever heard. Probably even Top 5.

O completely agree. It's like disabled kids in Poland. All are for protecting their lives in pregnancy, doesn't give a shi* once born.

Exactly. Rightists only care about unborn babies while women are completely ignored . Pity that some women are so brainwashed they are going to vote for PIS against their own interests.


Of course not.

@Gefreiter Kania,
Obviously, you've never been a woman, much less a parent.
Without visible means of support, how then is an American family to support children they can't afford, huh, smarty pants??

Well, at least you got that right. :)


What does that have to do with the idiotic sentence that "the Relgious right hates the child"?

If a single mother cannot support her child and can't count on any help from anywhere she can always give it for adoption. Anything is better than killing it.

The leftist approach is a bit like: "The mother is poor and can't afford all the cost - let's kill the child! She is a bit depressed with all the coming duties and resposibility - let's kill the child! The father is an irresponsible bum and he disappeared from the mother's life - let's kill the child!". Killing the child seems like the best solution to all the problems.

So, let me get this straight, Lyzko: the religious Right hates the child (that's why they want it to live) and the irreligious Left loves the child (that's why they want to kill it)? Is that it?

Come on, you can become one, just feel it!!
You say it you got it!
Why it does work only with gender? How about I feel like USA president, shouldn't they put me into White House right way?

The Right loves the idea of having children, preaching some sort of moral and religious obligation to women to procreate.
Fine. However, we're no longer living in the days of "Little House on the Prairie" when small, faith-based communities throughout the Plains States, would support a struggling family.

Since the advent of Reagan and the gradual whittling away of the New Deal, the scenario has changed entirely.

Where have you been?

:)

Good one, Iron.

Or what if a girl identifies as a rich person trapped in a broke girl's body, and it causes a lot of distress in her life? I think she should have a finances transition operation (like $20 million transferred into her account or something). xD

Where did you get that stupid idea from?Russian media?
The UK is doing fine without the EU.
Ask Germans how their economy is doing without the UK.......

From the Krauts or Frogs probably, two countries who wish it had been a disaster and can't quite handle that it wasn't.

Women's rights in. the UK are as good as the best anywhere else in Europe, not just in terms of legislation but in terms of how seriously it is taken.

There were group photos of all the cabinets in Europe shown recently and the UK cabinet has more people of colour than the rest put together. More women CEOs of major companies too.

No. We only hate the idiots who say such things.
By any chance, would you have any evidence to support your claim or is it just noise in your head?
As far as that "religious Right"...Let me guess...You, of course, mean Christians, not Jews. Right?


Why don't you like simple solutions, GK? Adoption is such a messy thing...What if later Momie regrets it and kills herself?


I knew that one day you and I would be best friends here. Good question, Iron.

About a week ago, I stopped at a high school and asked if I could start attending because I self-identify as a 16-year-old girl.
This was not the main reason why I went there but I just couldn't resist it.

Memo to "abortion rights" freaks: 1. There is no such right. 2. Inside a pregnant woman is alive human being. 3. She can do whatever she wants with it. We are not required to participate in it by permitting our licensed physicians to perform the procedure. There are many other doable medical procedures we don't allow.

Prompted by you great question, I just called one of the high schools in my area (Palatrine, Illinois) and asked if I can offer a one-time scholarship to the student who in my opinion would write the best essay on the subject of my choice. They said they would check and get back to me.

My subject will be: Should men be allowed to compete with women in women's sports?

To prevent semantical crap from getting in the way, I will define "man" and "woman".

@Rich, why do you hate the truth? You must, you know. You continue to fall into those same pitfalls of logic.
Or again, as with certain other posters here, you're simply brilliant, but merely play dumb in order to get attention!
Perhaps too, your English is actually excellent, but you've been holding out on us:-)

No. Do they???

This

Yes, for example by playing chess.

It's true.

Not quite the same. Blood or other organs are part of your body, the fetus is not.

Why do you beat your wife?


Yes, they do.
To get the taste of this insanity you need to watch only the first 60 seconds. FYI, the trans rules are the same in Canada and the US.

youtu.be/N7dyJfUxgOw

Did they undergo the operation and become women as a result? If they did, then it is OK for them to compete as women. I thought you were talking about males.

• 
  1312789881.3005.jpg