Professional feminists' of Poland meet-up

I'm wondering who is supposedly paying these supposedly professional feminists. And why they are paying those women. And where the money comes from.

Is it Jews? Is it Masons? Is it the notorious 'homosexual lobby'? Only one man has the answers!

Most of the funding comes from the NGO racket, generously bankrolled by Brussels. Women join an NGO for a feel-good sense of satisfaction that they are serving some cause, rise in the leadership and enjoy the benefits and prestige of membership, receive various forms of gratification, banquets, paid travel, delegations, hotels, restaurants, etc. That is the case not only in the 'feminist industry'. Many other so-called non-profit foundations earmark only a small amount of their assets for charitable purposes and eat and drink away the rest and even feather their nest a bit as well. The higher up in the NGO one goes, the more perks and privileges. Links? Just talk to people, circulate, surf the net. And use your common sense. In a country where the 'what's in it for me?' approach prevails most everywhere with the exception of Holy Mother the Church, that only stands to reason..

Polish priests who have Mercedes when the rest of the country has to cumulate two or three jobs to feed their kids, 'reasonable' to you?

polonius you are sadly deluded, sorry.

I agree. It's grossly unfair. Hopefully Pope Francis will do something about this. In fact, what do you think about the Tusks, Millers, Kaczyńskis, Rostkowskis and Piechocińskis of this world riding around in big pricey limousines when many of their compatriots, as you said, can barely make ends meet? Or the businessmen, bankers, actors, sports stars and other celebrities living high ont he hog in a world where half the people go to bed hungry?

The NGO racket? Wow. Is there any chance that you can give details about that one? Who are these shadowy NGO? Are they related to the NWO, the infamous New World Order?


My common sense is telling me that this is just another one of you 'the EU is going to micro-chip your babies' pieces of rubbish.


I once read about an American man who was so selfish that he wouldn't answer questions people asked him about Poland unless those people sent him along with their question a cheque for $15. Luckily here in Poland (as is so clearly shown by the answers posted at PF to questions asked), people are happy to give their time to help other people in exchange for exactly nothing. As for the church, they stick their hand out for a tenth of the gullible's income, don't they.

Like mr maybach collecting money to "save the shipyards"?

Could you perhaps tell us what percentage of the Lux Veritas Foundation's costs go on charitable purposes/

I haven't the foggiest, btu judging by the good its does, presumably it is earmarked for what was intended.

The only good thing that Lux Veritas does is keeps PiS well away from power, and one very much doubts that that was the goal the gullible were thinking about when they handed over their money.

Barney
Traditonal male jobs - in industry and mining, woodcutting, mechancial trades, taxis, seamen, etc., and female ones: secretary, nurse, teacher, shop assistant, waitrees, receptionist, etc. But since we now have male nurses and kindergarten teachers, why not female miners, skippers and loggers?

The naivete displayed by those supporting feminism is astonishing. I've owned 2 businesses and have consulted (still do) with others. I've dealt with the EEOC Commission and have attended various women's forums including involvement with womens battered shelters. I've been around-the-block with these issues and know them inside-out. I don't have time this morning to address the unsophisticated responses by those supporting alleged "womens issues".

Yes, there are "professional feminists" who make their living supporting various women-only causes, many of them are paid by taxpayers. I'll comment on that later when time permits.

The following link is a new one and it's one that feminists supporters cannot objectively refute. Of course, their arguments based on emotion always override logic. Feminism has been long ago hijacked by women wanting advantages, not "equality". In the long run it will hurt women, not help them.

Hopefully, the Polish women's conferences don't go the way of the typical western feminist.

links Zimmy shows are hateful lies.
Any effort to help abused women he interprets as hatred for men. He also believes that men are abused by women as often as women are abused by men.

Here are some real statistics: in US, one in 5 women is abused, men: one in 71.

splcenter.org/get-informed/intelligence-report/browse-all-issues/2012/spring/myths-of-the-manosphere-lying-about-women#.UcCNvvllk5Q

Very enlightening film. Especially striking was the prologue: 'If you want to know who rules, find out whom you are not allowed to criticise!'

But if you claim NGO's spend money on themselves, you should have an idea why the maybach imperium is doing a good job/

To continue on the same line as f stop, here's something else that sheds some light on this issue (U.S. based):
youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=8EK6Y1X_xa4

Thoughts?

Makes a lot of sense. Quite unlike the rants of foaming-at-the mouth feminists.
Maternity is a problem, but greater family input by husbands could alleviate it.
One can't blame employers who train a female worker only to have her go on materntiy leave.

Everything in my link was fact. You generalize because you don't know enough to be specific in your replies. Would you please comment on any of the facts presented in my link? Wimbledon? False sexual allegations? Feminists swearing at men walking into a meeting? etc, You choose.

As a quick related aside, the privileges women receive are ignored by feminists. They are extensive ranging from lower prison sentencing for the same crime to simple things like municipalities having female only libraries or London Bridge station having a female only waiting room; female quotas, etc, etc. Somehow, commenting on such realities makes me deserving of name-calling from those fearful of these fuller truths.

You're also fearful that what you have believed could be wrong. There has been a strong anti-male agenda which attempts to keep real men's issues at bay. In fact, men are the rebels now and feminism is the controlling pollitically correct establishment. Only womens' issues count. That's why the cry of "mysogynist" is immediatley tossed at anyone who dares suggest men have issues too. The fear of losing federal and state funding to men's concerns at feminist expense plays a key role. Self appointed statistic gathering organizations reinforce the feminist agenda as shown in your link. I'm more than familiar with the tactics and have exposed feminists on a professional level.


The above quote is exactly what I'm referring to. It's as false as the "wage-gap" which has been disproved statistically, let alone by common sense. You've seen the following link before. It comprises disparate and unrelated studies and investigations. That alone proves its authenticity. The self-serving figures created out of thin air by agenda driven organizations like the massive feminist lobbies are juggled in "politically correct" ways so as to fit their numbers thereby strengthening their government funding. The Fiebert investigations do no such thing as the aggregate figures are too large to be falsified. csulb.edu/~mfiebert/assault.htm


Well, of course, Dr. Thomas Sowell, a well-known economist presents his cases in a down-to-earth manner which people with common sense understand. Those bitten by the feminist agenda bug (just) don't get it. They continue to embarrass themselves by crying, "wage-gap" which makes them look ignorant.

No, you can't justify this with that. Except politicians, all the other 'professions' you mentioned 'produce' a lot of money. It's normal -to me- if they enjoy some of what they 'produce'. Even if sometimes it's really too much.

Plus, if we're talking about churchmen, don't they -traditionally- engage for a simple modest life with very little comfort? This has changed a lot. Well, in France, they are generally still 'poor'. In Poland on the other hand...

" politicans, celebrities, corporation executives, sports stars and others living in the lap of luxury while half the world starves. Why single out the church?"

Two reasons:
Those people earn their money, rather than begging it from the gullible.
And they pay tax on their earnings, unlike the RCC in Poland, which begs millions from the taxpayer and pays no tax on its income.

That doesn't ease the plight of the starving masses. At least the Church is helping the needy all over the world
by feeding the hungry, aiding the sick, disabled and abandoned, running homeless shelters, soup kitchens and leper colonies, homes for unwedded mothers and many other care facuilties. Much more than the politcal gurus,

capitalist greed-mongers or popculture plutocrats.

All that? ...then he must (also) be a feminist :)
Here is what establishment feminism which has gotten into almost every pore in government and culture has done to marriage.
pjmedia.com/eddriscoll/2013/06/17/men-on-strike In short, why should the modern man get married? I certainly never would again. After all, why give up so much and get back so little?....

When something like that is put forth, it becomes clear that the poster is not interested in anyone's opinion but his own.

It makes me wonder.. why would he imagine feminists foaming at the mouths?

Anyway, ask yourselves this: since feminism is the social movement seeking political, economic, and social equality of both sexes, why does it anger men so much?

I essentially agree with that statement which is 90% true. In fact only one word need be changed to make it read:
Feminism is the social movement seeking political, economic, and social CONTROL of both sexes.

To better understand how one-sided, partisan and 'hooray for our side' a movement it really is, please view or re-view:

Those hard-hitting facts are hard to refute!

What about professional tennis? And isn't the fact that boy scouts must accept girls but girl guides refuse entry to boys? I don't think things are quite that sick in the US YET, but who knows? With the way things are going soon people will be able to marry their pets.

If you've heard about mutual consent, you're smart enough to understand that this won't happen too soon.

All the leftist utopianists are known for their fancy rhetoric, coining new labels and expressions which through contstant media repetition soon become de rigueur to the brainless 'go-with-the-flow' crowd. Why couldn't dog's raised paw or bark be construed to mean 'I do!'

Such outlandish things are taking place or being demanded that nothing can surprise anyone anymore. Imagine women entering a men's room and then saying the urinals are offensive and should be removed.

Sound familiar?

Polonius, you're too good to always worry about our civilisation, and other people's well-being, but really, mind you own business. Are you married?

No-one will force you to marry your pet pigeon. You can keep whining at evil 'leftists' as you want, it won't change anything. If you want to live the 'traditional' way, why don't you shut down your comp and go buy a farm? Don't worry tho, you won't have to marry any of your pigs ;)

Indeed. Liberal-leftist media repetition of such buzzwords as islamophobe, homophobe, anti-Semite, fascist, bigot, etc. have intimidated people who cannot think for themelves into submission or silence.

Only the daft are intimidated.