Why is circumcision not practiced in Poland?

I agree with you Amethyst.
This decision should be made as an adult not by the parent, who will never have sex with their baby anyway.

Who's Norm?

It's best to snip boys as babies... less pain, quicker healing...

Watch a video how's done. Babies can't talk.

It doesn't need to be done. Let the man decide what he wants to do when he's older. It's unfair to boys to do surgery like that on them without their permission.

One would hope so. A botched circumsision isn't nice to see.

No, its because its more pleasurable...Have a look at my links...as I said, its there for a reason ;0)


And this is why:

It started as an ancient Egyptian custom and there are wall carvings to prove it. It seems to have its origin in snake worship. The Egyptians believed that when the snake shed its skin, and emerged shiny and new again, it was undergoing rebirth. They reasoned that if, by shedding skin, the snake could become apparently immortal, then humans should follow suit. They made the simple equation: snakeskin = foreskin, and the operation began. From there it spread to many Semetic peoples, both Arabs and Jews adopting it and converting it into an act of religious faith. As the centuries passed, it became popular in other regions of the world for moral, medical, or hygenic reasons.

Hmmmm..I wonder if the Egypitians called it the "trouser snake" lol :) sorry couldnt resist that one!

PlasticPole wrote:


like baptism.

PlasticPole wrote:


oh, why yes! and most married women look at their hubby's fat stomach and just can't stop themselves from jumping on top of him! you're arguing that because they are married, their wives MUST think it looks good? just stop. when a woman knocks out a few kids and decides she's done with exercising forever, consequentially packing on 20 kilos in her a$$ and thighs, do most men get a divorce thereafter? no, they stay married.....because they think it looks "natural". what in the hell are you talking about.

picture of a 35 year old man with a belly vs a picture of Brad Pitt in a 'Fight Club' scene. something tells me Brad's abs win....every time.

you like what you like, whether we're born that way or not.

There are much more important decisions made by parents even which later shape your character, it seems very logical at first sight but indeed it is not.


That links doesn't seem to be very scientific or medical, I don't believe that it can make that much difference.

Well the General Medical Council in the UK see no reason for a baby to be mutilated (lets face it is mutilation and there is no reason)...

Also if you read the links, they have valid points...As for does it make a difference...Men who are snipped are less sensitive, its stands to reason, they have no potection of that delicate area....So you can only dream of having the kind of sensation a man who has all his tackle..sorry but its true..

Oh and put a rather personal slant on things, as a woman who has had a long term relationship with a man who was snipped, I can tell you it does make a difference for a woman..a big difference.

sorry, but i don't think you have any idea what you're talking about :)

Why do you think they invented ridged condoms?

to get more money out of horny people?

amathyst wrote:


for example?

Do you want me to draw you a diagram?


Or to emulate the "real" thing?

good example to exaggeration.


Agreed,


I am neutral about it. I am circumcized myself but I believe It wouldn't make big difference in my life if I wasn't. we are not talking abbout cutting nose or the ears. Even having a tattoo in a visible area is bigger decision or might have more influence.

lol...please...


could you?

So where do you stand on female mutilation? Its a similar thing, they cut peices of the genitalia away that decrease sensitivity whilst having sex (in women its more extreme)


You will never know how sensitive it would have been had you not had it taken away..

Look, each to their own, but its not practiced in Europe and thats the point I was initially making.


Try one, you might like it?


I could direct you to a web site that might explain where a woman's 'G' spot is and why the foreskin rubbing against it causes an amazing orgasm :)

ok, got you, but we both know that women sensitivity levels vary.... and it doesn't necessary depend on a turtle :)


in Western countries it's illegal for a reason...

I am against it for sure, you can't compare it with the other.


I will not go more into detail :), I am satisfied enough and not curious at all how it would be without.


And there is no reason to practice it.

Very true (lol at turtle - that just made me laugh so much - thank you!) - but it is there for a reason and stimulation is one of them as well as lubrication.


You can't thats for sure, but i'm still struggling to see how they differ on a basic level..both are taking something away from a human being that they were born with to enjoy a simple pleasure?


Religion and fashion

That's what I meant by it ;)


Just like the male Glans 'mushroom' before starting a sex life and being touched often is so sensitive the slightest contact felt so pleasurable, euphoric. Over time the sensation lowers.

Exactly but we need to explain to them about sensitivity.

Okay, I'll phrase it like this for those that are snipped:

You know if you have ever sliced skin off a finger or toe and when the new skin grows back its really delicate and sensitive, can you imagine what your nob would be like had you not had abrasions rubbing for the last 20/30/40 years against it - foreskin is there to protect the delicate skin that makes life pleasurable for a man and equally for a woman..

As for the cleanliness, its complete rubbish, Ive smelt Arabs and Pakis who for sure have had their foreskins taken away and I wouldnt in a month of sundays want to even sit next to them let alone go down on one of them..!!!

Right on. 'The pleasure given by the foreskin itself is taken for granted in communities where it is commonplace - and also in communities where it is not, but where pleasure is frowned on.

Only in the US, where pleasure is now cultivated but foreskins are still rare, is that self-evident fact disputed.
Here are some historical quotes about the pleasures of the foreskin - many from people who deplored both.'

circumstitions.com/Pleasure.html

Here's a good show about circumcisions: Penn & Teller: Circumcision is BULSH*T!

It's just wrong.

I am circumsized and highly sensitive, I do not even think that I could be more if I am not. lol

In order to make a comparison and come to a conclusion for women, you should try both of them. Did you :)

Thats what you perceive.


Well what you have never had you never miss, I guess?


I have and the man and Im with forever now, has all his bits and I would not trade for all the tea in china.

i wonder how do you know the difference? :)

we have six senses...........You work it our hun!

Lol, that's generally how sensations work. To each their own, as long as there are no grown men out there traumatised from getting the snip I say, let them be. I've got mates on both sides of the divide and it's always been a non issue :)

Now imagine how much more sensitive and pleasurable that area would be if you still had the foreskin.
That skin is there for a reason, without it the male Glans keep touching and rubbing up against your underwear and pants over time making your 'tool' less sensitive. Same thing with the foreskin over the rest of the penis with a erection it's pulled back revealing the thinner, protected more sensitive skin.