Genealogy /
Why are some Polish people dark complected, and others very light [511]
every moment in time cannot be re-created or forseen so its up to the imagination
to bring forth these so called experiences from the past given the information
presented by those whom have explored these avenues of our past lives...
That's when logic must stop the imagination from substituting reality for fantasy and acknowledge others' pasts while admitting we have no past lives to readily call upon ourselves.
we,us,they, them -pleural forms meaning more then one.. history involves many..
No. "We" is a first person subject pronoun that means the speaker or writer speaks for a subject group as a representative. "Us" is first person object pronoun that accomplishes the same only as a object group representative. History involves many, but if a person was not a participant then as sanity dictates, they are not qualified to present themselves as one outside of acting or literature.
-We had to go through a lot during the period of partition.
In the above example, unless the person (albeit an example) had gone through this experience themself, then the term "we" is incredibly inaccurate.
not necessarily so, IMHO it can repeat itself thru others and in certain instances..
No, I'm sorry but you wrote yourself "in other instances," in my example the reasoning still stands unblemished and unaffected.
For example: someone can be attacked by a pitbull. it might not be the same one that attacks again.
Excellent point! I completely agree with you on some levels of this arguement. If i get
you right, a viable conclusion could be "we should be careful of this dog" or "this dog may attack us." Is that what you meant?
However, I've read the equivalent of people making statements like "We were attacked" or "This dog attacked us."
Semantically so close, yet so different in logic and in reality. Unfortunately people seem to look down on semantic specificity as it limits the play on emotions and doesn't allow for lazy thinking.
how we learn about animals, plants and humans because history can be predictable
in some instances
I completely agree with you again, and wouldn't dream of presenting anything against that. But, simply because this kind of thinking applies to laws of nature and the people act doesn't give us (yes "us") license to present ourselves as realtime players in things we (yes "we") haven't been apart of. Yes, in a thought exercise, of course you're right, (and then some). Yet there is a line of logic and reason people cross when given to imagination and it's in crossing that line people fall down the slippery slope into backward and childish rants that though full of base emotion, are void of anything beyond that. And outside the bedroom is seldom to positive effect.