The BEST Guide to POLAND
Unanswered  |  Archives 
 
 
User: Guest

Posts by nott  

Joined: 2 Jun 2010 / Male ♂
Last Post: 26 Jul 2011
Threads: 3
Posts: 592

Displayed posts: 595 / page 8 of 20
sort: Oldest first   Latest first   |
nott   
23 Sep 2010
History / What was better in Poland under communism? [67]

in civilized countries it is called obowiązek obywatelski. In Poland it is called donosicielstwo. ;)))

there is something to it :) PRL was not a 'civilised country'. It was a system of exploitation, and the nation reacted in a natural way. Stealing from the state was widely accepted, stealing from a private person was your ordinary thieving, despicable thing. You needed to paint your flat, you 'organised' paint from your factory, or a neighbour did you a favour for a symbolic bottle, then you went to your GP, and his first question was '3 days or a week'. Those who happened to actually have a flu felt like slightly embarrassed, un-Polish.

Weird stuff. Bareja got it right, although it seems unbelievable. In this reality, snitching means civil death, and sometimes worse. Civil death means you go to the shop and all you can get is what you see. It means you call a recommended plumber, and he's not doing it, sorry, and that was one exceptional case, my brother in law asked me to do a favour to his best friend's terminally ill mother, and she provided all the materials anyway, I only put it all together for a cup of tea and a nice chat. On Sunday.

edit: well, maybe it's not clear enough. The recommended plumber turns out to be a mistake, so you call the official service, they come next Easter, they leave mess in your bathroom, and the leak comes back the next day anyway, because they exchanged your loose, but otherwise good tap with a faulty one. They needed good material for good Poles, innit. You getting the gist?
nott   
24 Sep 2010
History / Should David Irving, Holocaust denier, be allowed to run tours to Poland? [246]

I assume you agree that neither Frédéric François Chopin nor Nicolaus Copernicus are Poles, given that their real names are so unPolish that Poles had to create Polish versions!

read my posts before assuming

No, I've got six Poles born in Poland to Polish parents.

But there was no Poland, so they were not Polish parents, innit. I do read your posts.

none of Sawoniuk, Serafinowicz, Palij, Obodzinsky, nor Bilaniuk were ever prisoners of war

So fkin what. Maybe they had to walk to school uphill. Even if you prove me the all five of them had Catholic baptism certificates for 7 generations of ancestors, you're still a sorry twat with a huge chip on your shoulder and possibly an inferiority complex like from here to Duszniki Zdrój. Vetala has already found the roots of some of your pure blood Poles anyway.

The staff of the disbanded 162nd Infantry Division in Poland was charged with the raising and training of the six Eastern Legions.

Just to make it a bit more precise, which is important in this thread:

In July 1942 the staff of the disbanded 162nd Infantry Division in occupied Poland was used to train battalions of the six newly established Armenian, Azerbaijan, Georgian, North Caucasian, Volga-Tartar and Turkestan Eastern Legions.

germanmilitaryhistory.devhub.com/blog/516219-the-osttruppen
nott   
24 Sep 2010
History / Should David Irving, Holocaust denier, be allowed to run tours to Poland? [246]

born in what Poles considered to be Polish territory, as evidenced by it being in Poland from 1918 until such time that Poland could not decided her own borders).

You said that nationality is defined by the country of birth. Their parents were not Polish, then.

Duszniki Zdrój is the longest direct train from Warsaw but that's another story.

I live in London.

Interesting to see that you have realised that you can't debate against facts and so instead resort to personal abuse.

It was a diagnosis, not an abuse. Your facts are rubbish, and your conclusions are rubbish too.

Could you perhaps quote the post in which I refer to any of them as "pure blood Poles"? I said that they were Poles who were born in Poland to Polish parents and they all were. But no doubt it is far easier for you to argue against what I didn't say than what I did say.

No, I can't quote your post in which you refer to them as "pure blood Poles". I can quote you saying that they were Poles born in Poland to Polish parents. You win big time, Harry, time to celebrate. I give you my permission to print this paragraph in bold letters, hang it on the wall in your sitting room, and wank to it any time you feel small and unimportant.
nott   
24 Sep 2010
History / Should David Irving, Holocaust denier, be allowed to run tours to Poland? [246]

It is hysterical to see Poles attempting to claim that certain people born in Poland to two Polish parents are not in the slightest bit Polish while at the same time claiming that certain people born in Poland to one Polish parent and one foreign parent are at the very least half Polish.

The explanation of Polishness was yours, try to keep to your own definitions. As for reasonable interpetations, Vetala explained it already. You don't take it, your problem.

I can see how it might be a very disappointing fact to a person who thinks that ever member of his nation is perfect in every way.

Try not to go personal, Harry, the Mod kindly requested. And if you can't, understandably, refrain from personal remarks, try at least to find something you could call a substantiated opinion if pressed.
nott   
24 Sep 2010
News / No de-Communisation in Poland? [41]

Solidarity could easily have said "nie" to the Round Table.

There was no Solidarity at the Round Table, there was a pro-commie faction. People who wanted to save as much of 'true socialism' as possible, or had dirty cards in their books. Michnik's mother was a well-known commie 'historian', and father of Kuron was an old ubek. I'll never forget Kuroń frothing from mouth while defending in Sejm the 'justly deserved pensions of hard working Poles who served the country with all commitment possible.'

The one thing you say is true: the communists were in power. But the situation was explosive, so they staged the 'national agreement', they stayed in power, and everything went down the gutter.

Not everything depended on the SB files. Party officials were widely known, and banning them from managerial posts, like in Czechoslowakia, would not damage economy nor administration in the slightest. 'Martial law' was illegal, massive abuse of power even according to the current law, so hanging of Jaruzelski and Kiszczak would not only put things right, but send a strong and clear signal as well. This was not possible, though, because of the people listed by P3.
nott   
25 Sep 2010
News / No de-Communisation in Poland? [41]

So Lech Kacyznski was part of the pro-Communist faction?

He was nobody.

Of course the situation was explosive.

For the commies.

We could have seen a bitter civil war

people didn't have guns. Not in 1981, nor in 1989. The army was unreliable even during the martial law. The worst what could happen was massive demonstrations and possibly some freaky accidents.

This is a hindsight, of course. But plenty of people then saw it this way too.

I'd say that in Poland, the transition was smooth, peaceful and showed that the Communists could give up power without violence.

Only they didn't give up power. They smoothly converted it from political to economical, adopting part of the opposition for the front.

And where do you stop? Many people were members of the party officially - do you ban all of them? In which case, you would have had massive gaps in such things as education - who would replace all of the school directors? Even many ordinary teachers were signed into the Party - should they have been disqualified too? Where do you stop?

Paid apparatchiks, that's what I meant by party officials. Not the 3.5 million of conformists. Easy distinction.

The declaration of martial law probably avoided civil war and a complete breakdown of society.

Wrong, as could only be. People had no guns, the makeshift pikes worked only once and for a while, in bitter defence. And society didn't need commies in power, as could be nicely seen in self-organisation skills during various previous events. People gave everything from themselves then, hope paid for the efforts. One of the things that prompted the 13 December action was that Solidarity started to organise 'shadow governments'.

Right or wrong, I think most people simply wanted Communism to go away.

'simply' wasn't an option. General strike and replacing the commie structure with the new one, was.

Anyway, the Church represented the opposition - and hanging people is hardly good Christian practice, is it?

:) the Church allows for hanging traitors no problem. Possibly Jankowski would say a short prayer.
nott   
26 Sep 2010
Language / "A" and "I" usage in Polish language [22]

Not at all.

Poles are dumb, and Brits are smart;
Polacy są tępi, a Brytole cwani.

Poles are dumb, and Brits are dumb.
Polacy są tępi, i Brytole są tępi.


You use 'a' when you might use 'but' instead of 'and' without much changing the sense. You can't use 'i' then.
nott   
28 Sep 2010
History / Should David Irving, Holocaust denier, be allowed to run tours to Poland? [246]

And some are being created by the sources. Both these newspapers are known for 'economical use of truth'. One thing drew my attention immediately: the Mail repeated at least three times that Irving was praising Hitler. Thing not to be overlooked however quickly you browse the text.
nott   
28 Sep 2010
History / Should David Irving, Holocaust denier, be allowed to run tours to Poland? [246]

But basic facts and things like his quotes they cite are probably accurate...

I'd bet they got the quotations right, or at least satisfyingly close. Now if you compare the manipulative styling of the article with the actual explanation of why Irving praised Hitler, then it looks a bit different. Great man etc. is difficult to deny, he made quite a splash.

It's not that I am a fan of Hitler, I just don't like this witch-hunt approach.

Edit:
Off to bed. Nite.
nott   
29 Sep 2010
History / Should David Irving, Holocaust denier, be allowed to run tours to Poland? [246]

Somebody already mentioned it. One guy with 11 sympathisers (assuming none of them was a mole from the Corriere), private wanking tour, and it makes world headlines.

Funny thing. While writing 'one guy' above, I made a typo 'one guoy', and then quickly corrected it to 'one 'goy'... then I saw what I wrote... please don't tell anybody...
nott   
29 Sep 2010
Language / "A" and "I" usage in Polish language [22]

Wow, Alex, and I remember you once saying that you can learn something from me too :) I am bigger by a span now, thank you :)

Allergy Caution: does not contain traces of sarcasm.
nott   
30 Sep 2010
UK, Ireland / Common pitfalls for Poles learning English [187]

Popular Polish mistake in London: 'mate' is not 'Mike', even if it sounds like 'mite', courtesy of Estuary English (?).

Yeah, 'how many sugars do you take?' is standard.

'how many sugar' is what I hear all the time... no plural whatsoever. Sugar is not countable, innit... Two sugar please.

For any perfectionists or masochists I'd recommend "A Practical English Grammar" by Thomson & Martinet

and what about me... Armstrong on the Moon allegedly said 'a small step for man...' which changed the famous words into nonsense, as they said. Took me a while to grok, and I am still in trouble while speaking or writing. With easier cases too...
nott   
30 Sep 2010
UK, Ireland / Common pitfalls for Poles learning English [187]

Yeah, that's what I learned in Poland. I unlearned it in London. At first I thought it was this immigrant thing, then I started to pay attention, and voila, the English did it the same way. Milk, two sugar. I know it's ridiculously wrong, the proper way is black, two sugar. But I am not going to teach them English, innit...
nott   
30 Sep 2010
History / Polish Occupational Zone in Germany (1945-1948) [4]

As promised.

The article is about one aspect of the history of the General Maczek armed division.

BB, I am not quite sure if this is news to you, but seems interesting. And I am not sure if you'll like it, so the deal you-know-which is open, actually. But there have already been some decisions made anyway, innit :)

The English translation: mediafire.com/download.php?djsdxasaw1bdw1a

Article in Polish: antoranz.net/CURIOSA/ZBIOR5/C0509/20050929-QZD07045_Haren.HTM
nott   
30 Sep 2010
History / Polish Occupational Zone in Germany (1945-1948) [4]

Whoa...I never heard of that before! Thank you nott (notti?)...that is real news.

my pleasure. Neither have I.

haren.de/pdf_files/vorlagen/maczk_w.pdf
wapedia.mobi/en/Haren,_Germany

some info confirmed, but not all, some added. The number of weddings is different... and wapedia says that locals were expelled 'on 19 May 1945'...

Anyway, a curio :)
nott   
1 Oct 2010
History / No Nazi puppet regime in Poland? [45]

For Poles nothing of that kind was planned

I'd say initially and with intention of. Later they didn;t have much choice.

Interestingly, there is was some cooperation of part of the Polish underground and Germans, by the end of the war, when NSZ decided that the Soviets are an enemy, not an ally. More of an armistice, than actual brotherhood in arms, but anyway. As far as I remember.
nott   
1 Oct 2010
History / When will you Poles give back German land and the cities which you robbed? [557]

I not even get my helmet back..

I got a helmet for you, I promised...

German guard cuirassiers helmet Prussia M 1894

German guard cuirassiers helmet Prussia M 1894

I tried to persuade away that White Eagle Crapping, but he only looked at me with those bulging eyes...

I think I am getting very busy right now, gotta go chop chop, see ya later...
nott   
1 Oct 2010
History / No Nazi puppet regime in Poland? [45]

OMG. Don't you guys ever tire of talking about this stuff? :s

That's why I liked the dancing, you know which...
nott   
1 Oct 2010
History / No Nazi puppet regime in Poland? [45]

I think... could be seen as betrayal, as they were Polish citizens. But in a rather legalistic sense.

Collaboration is reserved for doubtless Poles.

And I still have that question of Volksliste III in Silesia. I heard, from witnesses, that Silesians were 'enlisted' automatically. You are positive about that absolutely voluntary thing?
nott   
1 Oct 2010
History / No Nazi puppet regime in Poland? [45]

here also some not so voluntarily "recruiting" surely happend.

could be this. And there is some info of Silesians deserting from Wehrmacht, so like independent confirmation.

Not to mention that Silesia itself was splitted, the upper part with a majority of Poles and the lower part with a majoritiy of Germans...to treat Silesia as one just wouldn't had made much sense.

Right. I was speaking about Upper Silesia.

Edit:

Szczepaniak from Kattowitz-Sud... I am from there :)
nott   
1 Oct 2010
History / No Nazi puppet regime in Poland? [45]

How could Germans put a fellow named Szczepaniak on a Deutsche volskliste is beyond me!

But see the first name: Franz. Full-blooded German, innit :)

Frantzischek. Sounds German enough to me. Or Czech...
nott   
1 Oct 2010
History / No Nazi puppet regime in Poland? [45]


:) you may not know it, but Brunner had quite a crowd of fans in Poland. If you know what I mean :)

edit:

If he had tried, there would have been volunteers from pre-war Polish fascist parties.

Not quite sure. Fascist meant nationalistic, not pro-Hitler. Like ONR.
nott   
1 Oct 2010
History / No Nazi puppet regime in Poland? [45]

Fascists in Spain, in Holland, in France in GB and even as far as the USA etc. had been fans of Hitler...

But Poles are, you know, different :) I mean, German aircraft didn't shoot at refugees on the roads of Spain, Holland, etc.