The BEST Guide to POLAND
Unanswered  |  Archives 
 
 
User: Guest

Posts by DariuszTelka  

Joined: 4 Oct 2009 / Male ♂
Last Post: 8 Dec 2010
Threads: Total: 5 / Live: 4 / Archived: 1
Posts: Total: 193 / Live: 181 / Archived: 12
From: Norway
Speaks Polish?: yes

Displayed posts: 185 / page 1 of 7
sort: Latest first   Oldest first   |
DariuszTelka   
8 Dec 2010
History / Christopher Colombowicz: America's discoverer Polish not Portuguese, claim historians [60]

Thanks for the info! I actually find it very interesting, that so many "facts" that we grew up with are being questioned, and in many instances have to be revised. We had a very bold and brave explorer here in Norway, Thor Heyerdahl, who set sail over the Pacific Ocean from South America to the Polynesian islands in a self-made raft, to show that people there also were descendants from South America and not only Asia as previously thought. He also built a raft and sailed between the old South America and Africa and the Middle East to show how trade and interaction between these areas could be possible as far back as 3 000 years ago. He tried and failed, then tried again, and succeeded on rafts built from materials used back then. Before that, nobody thought it was possible. And so the historybooks had to be changed/altered, to show that indeed was possible.

One of the few points worth mentioned is that he was ridiculed, his theories were seen as "adventure-tales" and many "real" professors and historians did not take him seriously. They had to swallow their pride considerably when his rafts hit the shores of his destination intact with everyone onboard alive.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thor_Heyerdahl

Anyone visiting Norway must visit this exhibition, it's in Oslo. They have the raft and everything on display.

One of the last things he worked on before his death was the fact that a people living close to the Black sea by the river Don, were the Scandinavians forefathers as mentioned in the chronicles of Snorre Sturlasson famous Folk Saga writings, who people mostly have believed were a mix of folk tales and imagination. Heyerdahl though had other ideas, his theory, combined with excavations and relics found in a city named Azov, was that these people in the old folktales were real and migrated up north as the Roman Empire grew bigger, and settled in todays Norway, Sweden and Denmark. "The hunt for Odin":

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jakten_p%C3%A5_Odin

These are quite fascinating theories, and if one has an open mind, some are logical. But again, most professors and historians are sceptical, but also mocking him openly again. Maybe they will stop one day.

So, if Christopher Colombus really had a Polish father, then let the people following this do their work, and see what they come up with.

DariuszTelka
DariuszTelka   
7 Dec 2010
History / Christopher Colombowicz: America's discoverer Polish not Portuguese, claim historians [60]

The remains of a viking-type settlement were found by archaeologists in Canada (1963). These remains are believed to be around 1000 years old."

Does this mean Norwegians get to take over the Indian casinoes? Instead of Tipi's and Totem poles with ornaments, we'll have "Valhalla Casino and Gambling" and "Valkyrian Roulette"...with humongous statues of Thor and Odin at the entrance...hmm...

I read about the Kennewick man....9300 years ago....maybe he was Andrzej Kennewicki?

Ah, history is funny nowadays with the whole DNA and carbon dating thing going into overdrive....in the end we probably didn't come out of Africa, but Siberia.

DariuszTelka
DariuszTelka   
6 Dec 2010
History / Prophesy - Poland from sea to sea. [57]

Yes, Ireland4ever, according to some Americans, Europe is a country, and we apparently all speak French...or something.

youtube.com/watch?v=ANTDkfkoBaI

DariuszTelka
DariuszTelka   
6 Dec 2010
History / Prophesy - Poland from sea to sea. [57]

A video I found, that shows graphically how Europe and her borders changed in the past thousand years..cool to see how Poland was such a big part of it.

It's called "A thousand years of European history in 5 minutes"...(not completely correct, according to some comments, maybe someone here knows more).

snotr.com/video/6046

DariuszTelka
DariuszTelka   
27 Nov 2010
History / Roman Dmowski-Patriot, Nationalist, Anti-Semite? [237]

Gumishu: Of course! I'm not denying that the jews were not persecuted. I've stated this in many previous posts. They were among all the millions that perished in the concentration camps, internement camps, prisons, work programs and relocation that the Germans forced on the people they did see a future with. With Poles, Norwegians, Swedes, Dutch, British, Gypsies, homosexuals...

But my question is how they can just change the numbers like this and there is no revision of any sort. If the official number of deaths at Auschwitz were set to be 6 million, and they now say it's 1 million, it has to have some kind of reaction. For gods sake...it's 5 million people who are not accounted for! And the fact that so many stories were found out to be fabrications, like the lamp-shades made of jewish skin, the soap made of jewish fat, the forgery in paintings made after the war and displayed as "real" in museums and galleries, pictures that were cropped, altered and remade with false objects inserted, false stories by survivors, tortured Germans who falsely admitted to atrocities they did not commit, the fact that the gas chamber in Auschwitz was built up after the war, that they have not found any pits of bodies, no cremation site, no evidence of mass graves, no photos of anything, not even Hitlers signature on any paper. Churchill didn't mention the holocaust in his memoirs, the red cross did not mention it in their reports during the war, the British bombers did not see anything when they flew over the camps taking detailed pictures. Even Simon Wiesenthal has been caught lying on many occations about the camps, the murders and how he could see what nationality the jews who were burned in the ovens had, by the colour of the smoke that came out of the chimneys! But still the 6 million number stands.

But again, for jonni, or anyone else. I DON'T DENY THE HOLOCAUST, as a organized process of pushing the jews out of Germany's sphere of power. With brutal force. But the numbers just don't add up, and as long as the lies just keep on coming up and the facts don't support the claims...then I feel there should be a revison of the whole story.

The reason I care is because our countries still pay money to victims, survivors, upkeep of museums, trips, movies, theatre plays, books, school tours etc. Especially Poland is always connected to this insanity. This morbid tale of lies. It has to stop. It's an industry. Just read Normal Finkelsteins book on the subject. The Holocaust Industry.

Added note: And the fact that if you even QUESTION any of these inaccuracies, you will BE JAILED FOR YEARS for "Denying the Holocaust" in many European countries. Dozens of scholars, professors, historians and just normal people who stood up are sitting behind bars....which goes against all our rights of freedom of speech and the right to question our history. Imagine if we couldn't question the "fact" that the Katyn murders were done by the Russian and not the Germans? If people would go to jail for questioning this...how unfair wouldn't that be? If noone could question any "dogma" or what is written in our history books?

DariuszTelka
DariuszTelka   
27 Nov 2010
History / Roman Dmowski-Patriot, Nationalist, Anti-Semite? [237]

Was Roman Dmowski Poland's "Otto - The Nazirene"? It's the story about the movie "Life of Brian" and scenes that were deleted/cut out by jews themselves, about Eric Idles charachter "Otto - The Nazirene", who was "determined to promote Jewish racial purity, carve a Lebensraum from the "traditional Jewish areas of Samaria," displace the Samaritans into internment camps, and plan an Anschluss of Jordan to "create a great Jewish state that will last a thousand years."

notmytribe.com/2009/zionists-censor-life-of-brian-final-cut-812015.html

DariuszTelka

p.s. Harry, I see you suddenly got very interested in numbers again. When we discuss the holocaust, and I pointed out to you the fact that the official Auschwitz numbers were taken down from 6 million to 4 million to 2 and half million, and now down to 1 million, you didn't really care too much about that. But to find some "6 488" doctors and defining percentage is suddenly important and you get to tell people that they lie. But those 5 million that suddenly came to life or never lost it, whichever way you look at it in Auschwitz...now, what about that "percentage"? Important? Who is lying now? The museum? The Russians? The Poles? The Simon Wiesenthal Center? You?
DariuszTelka   
15 Nov 2010
History / POLES NOT KEEN ON REPRODUCING? WHY ARE THERE SO MANY GERMANS AND RUSSIANS? [67]

What about the Dutch and the Norwegians? Should we feel special too? (As endangered species I mean!)

Yes, actually. In Oslo the most popular name in the maternity wards is now Mohammed. Oslo, as a city, will have a minority ethnic Norwegian population in less than 20 years. There are already dozens of school with less than 1% Norewegian children attending in Oslo and the surrounding areas.

All this has happened in just over 30 years. The next 30 will be disasterous if nothing changes or stops.

DariuszTelka
DariuszTelka   
15 Nov 2010
Life / I saw Polish nationalism today [249]

Ender, I found som links to the marches around in Poland. I read in article that they had slogans like: "There is no shame in being Polish", "Poland, big and independent" and "Patriots march again".

March from Warszawa:

youtube.com/watch?v=oih9rEVWyZk&feature=player_embedded

March from Wroclaw:

youtube.com/watch?v=I_xL4dKdlbs&feature=player_embedded

A guy not happy with the police. He complains about how they, the Poles can't even move freely around. I also read the the "left" side didn't have the right to demonstrate that day, but did so anyway. Some of the anti-fascists attacked people going to the march on a train with hammers and tear-gas.

youtube.com/watch?v=bB2Bzf3zpE4&feature=related

"The nationalist march commemorating Poland's Independence Day finished by the monument to 1930s nationalist leader Roman Dmowski".

thenews.pl/national/?id=143298

Is this really "nazi"? Or is it ultra-nationalism/patriotism? I can argue that nationalism/patriotism is very good for a nation. As well as I can argue that nazis have nothing to do in Poland.

How are people ever going to get the difference?

DariuszTelka
DariuszTelka   
12 Nov 2010
Life / I saw Polish nationalism today [249]

Skinheads and neo-nazis in countries previously occupied by nazis are not uncommon. Now if someone want's to write a "Freudian" university paper on the subject...go ahead. I'm just gonna link a couple of newsarticles that can make people go.."huh?".

"A neo-Nazi gang in Israel sounds, at first, like a nasty mistake. But experts say that eight young immigrants from the former Soviet Union may have stumbled over a mundane obstacle: integration."

"Police said the cell's leader was Eli Buanitov, a Jewish-descended Russian immigrant who swore in an e-mail never to have children. "I won't have kids," he wrote, according to detectives. "My grandfather is half Yid, so that this piece of trash won't have ancestors with even the smallest percent of Jewish blood."

spiegel.de/international/world/0,1518,504803,00.html

"English skinheads wave.... Israeli flag!!!!"

dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1211414/Anti-fascists-clash-right-wing-protesters-Birmingham.html

"German Islamists convicted over bomb plot"

"Four Islamists have been convicted by a court in Germany of plotting to attack US facilities in the country.

The men, two of whom were German-born converts to Islam, were given prison sentences of between five and 12 years.
"

news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/8549044.stm

And now for the "raisin in the sausage", like we say in Norway:

"Norwegian police are investigating new claims that a Russian neo-Nazi arrested in Oslo last month was planning attacks on personnel at the Russian Embassy and on Norwegian muslims".

newsinenglish.no/2010/10/07/russian-neo-nazi-planned-attacks/

Now, does this make the polish "nazis" look any less crazy? Maybe not, but there sure is a lot of strange things going on in Israel/Europe right now. I could just as easily have found the same "crazy" people on the left, stalinists, animal liberation groups, anarchists, muslim fundementalists, feminists etc. They're all out there for those who want to see.

The nazi/skinhead movement is basically dead. What we see here are remnants of the past, trying to find a new form. The only reason nazi stuff is/was used was to get attention and to scare people. 99% of the people in these groups did not know anything about national socialism, Hitler, the war or anything. But to tattoo a swastika just meant to be a rebel, to stand out. It could just as easy be replaced with another symbol which would represent the fight against communism or muslim immigration/violence towards ethnic europeans. But the swastika or any other nazi symbol works best. The media and the leftist governments that have had control over our countries the last decades made sure of this. The communists in Oslo and other european countries could have their own house, concerts, marches, flags with communist symbols..they were free to voice their political view. The right wing had none such freedoms. This naturally created tension and animosity among the "frustrated" nationalistic elements of the population. Poland is not vaccinated against this, so there will be people who are attracted to these views and political fringe groups. How many are they in Poland? 0.000001% of the population?

DariuszTelka
DariuszTelka   
18 Oct 2010
UK, Ireland / Why Manchester rules over Warsaw :) [65]

Northmancpolak:

I have som good memories from Manchester. Especially staying at the Castlefield hotel next to the museum you posted a picture from above, the hotel is brilliant with a football hall, running track, swimming pool, squash halls, weight rooms, snooker rooms and a bar next to the football hall. More hotels like this, please! But the weather, man..the weather, how do you cope? Waking up and seeing the whole year pass by in one hour outside your window. I'm not kidding, it had all four seasons in just one morning. Sunny, cloudy, rainy and in the end..snow, before the sun came back again. Finding out what to wear was a b*itch. English weather at it's best...

I went to Manchester about ten years in a row up until 2005 or so, to watch Manchester United play at OT and a fair amount of away games. I do NOT remember Manchester from the pictures you posted here...something serious has happened to the skyline...I remember they took away our favourite pub at the intersection where Sir Matt Busby road starts..but this is crazy.

My biggest experience there, apart from watching Manchester United, was when they bombed the Arndale center...(I believe it was the IRA). And being told NOT to go to Moss side after eight o'clock at night. Otherwise we had a great time in Manchester, nightclubs were good, restaurants also, although I got a bit sick of the lack of trees and grass in the city centre after two weeks...

On the other hand, the same gang of friends stopped by Warszawa for one evening this summer, and we were very impressed with the old town. After a night out, we walked for quite a stretch along the old city centre and the buildings were magnificent. To think that all of that was rebuilt after the war is mindboggling. Now, why couldn't they have made ALL of Warszawa like that? What we saw outside of the old town is better not spoken of.

DariuszTelka
DariuszTelka   
13 Oct 2010
UK, Ireland / The more subtle differences: Ireland/Britain v Poland [310]

That is not what we are talking about: we are talking about the inability generally displayed by Polish people to accept any comment, no matter how it comes up, that anything about Poland or Poles is in any way less than ideal.

I just said English, but could just as well said, Swiss, Finnish, Maori or Vanuatuan for that matter. It's about the big picture, about how people react when you critizise them in their own living room or talk about their country. Like the way you simply cannot write a sentence without either "stating a fact", calling somebody a liar or insulting someone. How about it Harry, why don't you try and be a little more people friendly, huh? Being so confrontational has to wear you down?

Englishmen are a one-of-a-kind breed, I'll give them that, but that's why people love them so much too. Unfortunately for them, they are emigrating en masse every year to the States and Australia because of the political insanity that currently runs their country. Over 100 000 brits leave the Island every year:

I can't remember ever saying anything of the kind. But I suppose it is a bit much to expect you to actually address what I say, much easier for you to rail against what I do not say.

I don't really have the time or energy to sit and read through all your posts, but I remember that you haven't exatctly been the promotor of diplomacy and level-headedness here on PF. If someone could sit down and count how many times you wrote something derogatory or personally insulting, it would take them an entire evening. Or two. And I remember people gave you back as good as they got. You don't find this kind of debate tiring? (It takes two to tango...).

I have no respect for people who have proven that they do not deserve it. Holocaust deniers are one group of such people.

I don't deny the holocaust. I question certain aspects of it. Don't worry Harry, I have enought respect for the both of us.

DariuszTelka
DariuszTelka   
13 Oct 2010
UK, Ireland / The more subtle differences: Ireland/Britain v Poland [310]

You must have noticed that criticising Poland is a game that only Poles can play! If any foreigner says anything which could in any way be interpreted as negative about Poland, it is the duty of all Poles to criticise that foreigner and to 'defend' Poland (even if they themselves have in the past made precisely the same observation about Poland as the foreigner made).

This is basic human psychology 101...

This is not really a "Polish" thing! I really think you would experience this in any other country in the world.

Just try walking into an pub in England and start complaining to people there about their food, their culture, their history. And then travel to Germany or Denmark and do the same thing. They would ask you pretty quickly to go to hell! They themselves can of course critizise themselves, their culture and their history, but you can't! Not like some of you do on this forum. This is basic social intelligence, and applies to all aspects of human life, wether it's work, family or your country. This also works even on the highest of levels. Just read international political news, and you will find dozens of articles about prime ministers and presidents of different countries arguing to clean up their own sh*t before they critizise others'. Sweden vs Denmark in the recent elections are fine examples of this.

If one thinks that critizing and pointing out other peoples' or countries' shortcomings is normal and should be accepted on any level, one would find oneself really alone, really fast. Or in worst case in the emergency room with a tooth or two in your hand. This is NOT exclusive for Europe, just try it Nigeria or Japan for that sake. I think you will find that all people's of the world don't like it when foreigners start complaining or pointing out their weaknesses to them. Especially IN their own country. These weaknesses might be true, they might be obvious, and most people are aware of them, but it's a difference of acknowledging them and being told about them in a rude/forward way from some stranger who visits/lives your country.

Do not mistake this for legitimate and contstructive critizism, which I have seen very little of on this forum. From what I've read here it's mostly unpolished, blunt and not really well thought through opinions. With a few honourable exceptions. (Seanus and BB for instance).

If a foreigner living in Australia went on to a "Australian forum" and started threads like "Are all Australians dirty?", or "Why do Australians drink so much?". And then keeps this up, day after day, week after week, month after month, just constantly slagging every aspect of Australian life, wether it's everyday things or the country's history....would you expect the Australians on that forum to go, "Yeah, it's true, we suck", or would you expect them to tell you to go f*ck yourself? Also try this on a personal level with your friends, and see how far that will get you. On the other hand, if there were some meat to this theory, some facts, some statistics, and then use this with a civilized tone and not a suggestive or derogatory tone, I would think the level of debate on this forum would be where it should be! (On these kind of topics).

If you used some of the threads here that have shown a poor choice of words and switched the words "Poland", "Polish" and "Poles", with let's say, "African", "Homosexual" or "physically challenged", people would call it for what it really is, bigoted and unfair. But since it's "Poland" we talk about, well then, the gloves are off.

EVERY country has something that is bad, either it's the red tape in government, bad roads, religious intolerance etc. Most people in here are not Polish by birth, and I would think if I asked them to point by point write down what they would like to improve in their birth-country, this list would be rather long, well into double digits. No?

I know some of the debates here have been about historical events, and both Polish, German, Ukrianian, Dutch, American, Serbian and even people with the possiblity to hold 7 different passports (Harry) have slugged it out. But to say that "all Poles" or "Poles" share the views of half a dozen of posters here on this forum is a bit disrespectful and untrue. Now, if a professor of history from a Polish university started to lie openly on this forum about an established fact, one could broaden the terminology a bit.

And Harry, you have the diplomatic skills of a 10 year old boy, maybe tone it down a bit when you critizise people? It's amazing how far one comes with a bit of humility and respect! (Two way street).

DariuszTelka
DariuszTelka   
12 Oct 2010
UK, Ireland / The more subtle differences: Ireland/Britain v Poland [310]

It saves electricity and the environment. In short, you're a bit of a nob if you leave the lights on everywhere - they don't need to be on if you're not in the room!

Well, my thoughs were that Polish and German housing areas look a little bit darker than i Norway, not so many lights on in the windows or outside. Almost like nobody's home. But you can see the lights from the TV flickering in the living room...

About the enviroment, I don't think either poles or germans use that as an excuse not to light up their homes. Maybe in the last 5 years, but in the 80's and 90's?

Besides, I buy those new long lasting bulbs...which saves electricity AND the enviroment...so no nobbing of me, please!

Another thing I just remembered was the usage of water. My wife always turns off the faucet when brushing her teeth, while I keep it running...she does it because her family were very particular of not showering too long or leaving the water running for longer than necessary. I know, I know, enviroment. But I also have water-saving shower heads.

My thought is, is there a line here between the old west and east? Westeners more likely to keep lights on and letting the water run, and old easternes preserving and turning off every light as they leave the room?

DariuszTelka
DariuszTelka   
12 Oct 2010
UK, Ireland / The more subtle differences: Ireland/Britain v Poland [310]

I just have to put in a thing, that I don't think yet has been adressed. Lights in the house/apartments, both inside and outside.

In Norway, most houses are lit up outside with lamps in the driveway and on the actual house..and almost all the windows in the house, especially the main rooms are lit too.

In Poland and Germany, from what I remember, there are almost no lights outside, and inside one only lights up the room someone actually uses, and turns it off when one leaves. (Doesn't that make the bulb burn out faster?) In my opinion it makes the home look sad and abandoned.

And watching TV with no lights in the living room ruins my eyes!

My wife kills me with this. I come home and immidiately turn on almost all the lights in the house, excluding the bathrooms. She walks behind me and turns them off...if I haven't been in my office for about 20 minutes, somehow she manages to turn it off....arrrgh. Stop it!

I personally hate dark rooms and dark house areas. And if someone comes visiting, it would be nice if they could actually see the path up to the house and not have to look like blind people entering a room for the first time, before they locate your front door.

Sometimes if I come home after my wife in the wintertime, and find her on the computer, while there are no lights on...I always ask her if Osama Bin Laden is around somewhere in this cave, or if she forgot to pay the electricity bill.. But for her this is natural, and something her Polish family did her whole life.

DariuszTelka
DariuszTelka   
28 Sep 2010
UK, Ireland / Ed Miliband, new Labour leader, talking about Polish immigrants yesterday [62]

There's no small Arabic/Moorish influence on these in European culture in the early Mediaeval period - and we've not yet mentioned the spice and silk trades.

Sorry, everything I mentioned came from the "white man", the Hindus, Egyptians, Persians, Mesopotamia and European culture. The Moors and arabic culture never had anything they didn't conquer, kill and overtake by brute force. What happened to the islamic "golden age" after islam conquered all these great places? It all stopped, rather quickly.

You can equate it a bit to how the Christians took over heathen Europe. Over all the religious places of worship, there were built churches, all the nice and accepted traditions like yule celebrations, traditions like santa claus, the christmas tree, summer and winter solstice, all these were stolen/taken/incorporated into Christianity so to not upset the locals too much.

The same happened with the muslims in Persia and other places mentioned above. They came in, took over what was there, like math, science, algebra, litterature, and made it "arabic", translated much of it and then passed it on as "theirs". Tody, sadly, there are few remnants of those great civilizations, and only islam in it's pure form remains. Oppressing, non-democratic, homophobic, sexist and religious intolerant to other faiths and their lands former history and knowledge.

But as all these sciences and technology slowly ventured up north, to free havens like Europe, and our continent started to blossom! Today one can clearly see the difference in our ways of life. This is not a coincidence.

Arab conquest of non-muslim lands after 600AD:

everything2.com/title/Chronology+of+the+Arab+Conquest

This one is a bit long, but very informative on how the muslim took over Persia and ruined it;

"The Arabs those days knew nothing about art, architecture, mathematics, astronomy and chronology. Arab conquerors were even surprised when they robbed their first coins. So after four centuries of Islamization in Persia the light of science and knowledge had slowly faded away".

historymedren.about.com/library/text/bltxtiraq4.htm

How Mesopotamia as it was called under Greek rule was conqured and today is called Iraq;

"Most of the Iraqi tribes were Christian at the time of the Islamic conquest. They decided to pay the jizya, the tax required of non-Muslims living in Muslim-ruled areas".

onlydemocracy4iran.com/2010/09/05/the-golden-age-of-islam-another-theft-of-persian-heritage-and-history/

And last, my favourite, "What arab civization?"

"You state, "its architects designed buildings that defied gravity." I am not sure what you are referring to, but if you are referring to domes and arches, the fundamental architectural breakthrough of using a parabolic shape instead of a spherical shape for these structures was made by the Assyrians more than 1300 years earlier, as evidenced by their archaeological record".

ninevehsoft.com/fiorina.htm

All the science, the numbers, the astronomy, astrology...it was already there, Alexw68. Just look at the nobel prize winners list...how many muslims do you find there in math and science? The ones with arab sounding names are mostly Christian arabs, educated in Europe or the US. So still today, the arab/muslim world cannot keep up with us...something to think about?

DariuszTelka

Mod: Sorry, off-topic again....last time, I promise.
DariuszTelka   
28 Sep 2010
UK, Ireland / Ed Miliband, new Labour leader, talking about Polish immigrants yesterday [62]

Monoculture makes soil barren and impoverished, you cannot say this about multicultural societies.

Well, it depends on what we put in "monocultural" and "multicultural".

In this aspect I meant monocultural as "European", and multicultural as mixing christanity with islam.

The first one works, and has given us the western world as we know it through art, science, technology, litterature, democracy, womens rights, workers rights and freedom of speech.

The second one has given us terror, hate, fear, religious intolerance, racism, homophobia, bigotry and reduction of womens/childrens rights.

One can of course interpret these differently, as Europe being multicultural, as mixing German, French, Spanish and Russian cultures too. But in today's political climate it's mostly "us" versus "them", as in christian secular world against the islamic world.

DariuszTelka
DariuszTelka   
27 Sep 2010
UK, Ireland / Ed Miliband, new Labour leader, talking about Polish immigrants yesterday [62]

Not really, but there ain't much point arguing with irrational racists. (Is that a tautology?)

See, now you go back to your happy life calling people medicated, irrational, racists, bigots, haters, nazis, rightwing...you know, the typical left wing, marxist, islamic debate techniques you learnt in the labour union class you took. Tautology is your stongest forte, jonni.

monocultural?? A term borrowed from farming and just as unnatural.

Then how natural is multicultural?

DariuszTelka
DariuszTelka   
27 Sep 2010
UK, Ireland / Ed Miliband, new Labour leader, talking about Polish immigrants yesterday [62]

Yes - it moved me to correct the deliberate untruths.

That's in the eye of the beholder....

Apart from tme "monocultural" thing (in a country of 60 million people??!?) I largely agree with that statement.

White brits will be a minority on their own land in the not-to-distant future if todays immigration policies continue. The US has gone from 90% white, to about 60-70% in just 50 years. Tick tock.

This is largely the point - you have accused the man of being a Marxist, you posted lies about his family, you impugned him on the grounds of his ethnic background - this seems par for the course, however some people reading your nonsense may actually believe it. This is how ugly rumours start.
You also claimed he held the political views of his ancestors (maybe transferred by some sort of osmosis), and when questioned, evaded the issue.

You have described the political debate and climate in the EU perfectly! (Just take out "marxist" and exchange it with any other political label, especially right wing).

Can you back any of that up? No. It's obviously your "own words"!

If I had the time and energy, I would read through all your posts and sit here and copy/paste until my fingers were bleeding. You just have to trust me on this one.

To hate only hatred itself. Though I'll remind you of your comment
DariuszTelka:
you see, I don't just go after muslims but other third worlders too

I go after ANYONE who plan on ruining my ideal western world. Including white people. Actually I go after them MORE, because they willingly allow their culture and heritage to be destroyed and even advocate this!

This is clear - by the way, can you categorically state that you despise every point of Nazi ideology?

That was a very serious question, that I would like to answer yes to. Although I would like to keep the Beetle, the Autobahns etc, but I think you are specifically thinking about their race/extinction/warmongering/landgrab policies. But from their rise to power, and as a result of their policies until the brutal end, the CRAZY left that got into power in the western world with their open border policies as direct result, make our future look rather bleak. Since you found one of my posts about the third world commentary, you should also have found the one where I said I would shoot Hitler in 1933 if I had the chance. Good enough for you?

DariuszTelka
DariuszTelka   
27 Sep 2010
UK, Ireland / Ed Miliband, new Labour leader, talking about Polish immigrants yesterday [62]

Listen jonni, I don't have to show you anything. I posted my info, and it obviously made an impact on you. I don't really care about Miliband, but put in my 5 cents on the subject. From the superficial information I got in my 30 minute web-browsing on him, he fits nicely into the new mold of "leftists", who come from shady backgrounds and who are going to continue to ruin our western world with their seriously fekked up policies.

I'm for less govenrment, monocultural societies and restoring the old ways of honesty and integrity. It's what built up our great civilizations.

I don't see that in Miliband. I don't see that in any politicians in Norway either. I only see more regulations, draconian laws, CCTV, scanners, microchips and big brother. What has this political view done for our culture?

I kind of put everything out there from a personal aspect, while you just sit there and attack, without really contributing or putting any personal opinions out at all. Why should I care to sit and answer you sentence by sentence, when you write one-liners about things you didn't even read correctly and cry like a little baby, demanding answers from me? Get a fekking life and put your own words out there!

I have written hundreds of answers to people here before, mostly to get crap and wishwash back, like your posts. I'm sorry, I just don't care what you think. I put out my view, and you may like it or not. Hopefully someone else will indulge your insanity. As I remember, you inquired into me being banned from this forum once, without actually saying why or proving what could be used against me to back up that claim...that shows your true colours, jonni. (More regulations, less freedom, you know...leftist, marxist, islam politics that you seem to adore).

You're the real hater, and you know it.

Now bugger off.

DariuszTelka
DariuszTelka   
27 Sep 2010
UK, Ireland / Ed Miliband, new Labour leader, talking about Polish immigrants yesterday [62]

Any proof of that? Thought not! Nonsense from a diagnosed nutter as usual.

"From his Marxist-Jewish background, David Miliband has emerged as a passionate advocate for action against climate change. We meet the Environment Secretary, one of Labour's rising stars".

"he is far from being a Marxist, but he respects his parents' values"

/lifestyle/interviews/6090/david-miliband-red-green-a-generation

That is obligatory press-BS, he openly says his party is "Red", he acknowledged that "terrorism" is acceptable under special circumstances during an interview with the BBC, but nobody wants to explicit say they are marxist, for not to scare the voters..

"In 1965, the year David was born, Ralph Miliband bought a house in Edis Street in London's Primrose Hill, not far from Euston station. David Miliband still lives in the house today.

Edis Street became one of the great London meeting places for Marxists and socialists from around the world. The family's basement dining room was open house, and the scene of high-minded and often heated discussions between major figures on the Left.
"The key thing about the Miliband household was this belief in argument and debate as the way to arrive at the truth [...]

news.bbc

"In August 2009, Miliband was a guest on BBC Radio 4's Great Lives programme, choosing South African Communist Party leader and anti-apartheid activist Joe Slovo.[44]"

"In an interview with CNN in 2009, Miliband stated that he has a Jewish background, grew up in a secular setting, and describes himself as an atheist with a "huge respect" for people of faith".[1] Atheist Jew = Marxist

And as usual, they don't practice what they preach;

"DAVID MILIBAND is living in a £1.5million London townhouse at the centre of a complex inheritance-tax avoidance scheme Gordon Brown has pledged to ban.

highbeam.com/doc/1G1-162434630.html

AND he runs around telling countries that fight against militant islam terror-groups that they should relax and let them have what they want. As he did in India and Sri-Lanka....until they started burning effigies of him in the streets, and he went home to his tax-free mansion in England...

And considering his family history....

"The online biography of Adolphe "Ralph" Miliband says he was born in Brussels of Polish-Jewish emigré parents and that both his parents lived in the Jewish quarter of Warsaw, before his father, Samuel "Sam" Miliband, joined the Red Army in the Polish-Soviet or Bolshevik War (February 1919 ­ March 1921).

Sam Miliband is said to have left Poland after the First World War, which ended in November 1918. He supposedly became a leather worker in Belgium and then returned to Poland to join the Red Army under the command of Leon Trotsky (born Lev Davidovich Bronstein) in 1920."
.

Dead corpse of Poland....what a nice grandfather.

And your point is?

That if Tony Blair said the same things Miliband said, just exchanges "Jewish" for "Anglo-Saxon", then he wouldn't have become the Prime-Minister of Britain.

As for the "regulations", the more regulations, the more CCTV society you will have, the more control the governement will have over you. What kind of evils tried to implement these kind of societies? Communism and National Socialism. And today, the left side, with the unions, the global warming brigades, the immigrant policies that they openly stated they set in effect, so to keep in power. These are all actions of madmen!

Less regulations, less governement equals freedom, jonni. But maybe it's hard for someone who admires more rules, more control and defends islam?

And I'm a diagnosed nutter huh?

Why don't you read the articles before you defend your marxist hero.

DariuszTelka
DariuszTelka   
27 Sep 2010
UK, Ireland / Ed Miliband, new Labour leader, talking about Polish immigrants yesterday [62]

"Being Jewish must have an influence on the way I think. I am the child of Jewish immigrants and that is a very important part of my identity. It would be wrong to pretend that I was brought up as part of the heart of Anglo-Jewry, but if you ask, do the community's values speak to me? Yes they do. My commitment to equality, social justice, freedom of expression and solidarity must in so many ways reflect my origins. If you try to analyse where I stand politically, it would be very hard to explain that without reference to my roots."

Now exchange Jewish with "White" or "Anglo-Saxon"....tomorrow's headline; "Miliband resigns after racist language".

thejc.com/lifestyle/interviews/6090/david-miliband-red-green-a-generation

Leftist, marxist, jewish, red, global warming, regulations = Speculations in the press of being future prime minister!

DariuszTelka
DariuszTelka   
25 Sep 2010
History / Should David Irving, Holocaust denier, be allowed to run tours to Poland? [246]

No fair, I meant from links to wiki not what I think hate speech is...

Sorry, I feel like Harry now...

If anyone thinks David Irving is being harrassed then think again...this newsstory worries me a bit more than a 72 year old man having alternative views on the holocaust;

"Three-year-olds being labelled bigots by teachers as 250,000 children accused of racism"

It goes on;

"Teachers are being forced to report children as young as three to the authorities for using alleged 'racist' language, it was claimed last night".

"Munira Mirza, a senior advisor to London Mayor Boris Johnson, said schools were being made to spy on nursery age youngsters by the Race Relations Act 2000".

"More than a quarter of a million children have been accused of racism since it became law, she said".


The WHAT act? The Race Relations Act 2000? The New World Order, coming to a kindergarden near you....

dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1314438/3-year-olds-labelled-bigots-teachers-250k-children-accused-racism.html

F*ck the holocaust deniers, let's get the kids!

DariuszTelka
DariuszTelka   
25 Sep 2010
History / Should David Irving, Holocaust denier, be allowed to run tours to Poland? [246]

All hate speech is illegal for a very good reason but you are a right wing nut, so you only have a problem with Muslims making hate speeches, go figure.

Ok, so we agree. Hatespeech is Verboten, this makes both Irving, AND islam illegal!

I can live with that!

Why didn't you just say this right away, we could have been spared all these posts.

Thanks for clearing this up for us!

DariuszTelka
DariuszTelka   
25 Sep 2010
History / Should David Irving, Holocaust denier, be allowed to run tours to Poland? [246]

You go on long off topic rants blaming 'lefties', PC, on not allowing freedom of speech.

A thread can go many ways. If I could connect the muslims to this thread, it is the fact that leftist want to stifle debate if it's people like Irving or political right-wing parties, but have no problem allowing muslims to say things that are much more hateful and anti-democratic. It's this double standard and hypocrisy that I'm out to understand. So, the consequenses of allowing muslims to come into majority power would be that the holocaust never happened, that the sale of Mein Kampf would again be legalized and other than that, there would be no free speech. And no PF for that matter to even debate free speech! How about them apples?

I have shown you have limits to freedom of speech, all you have illustrated is which hate speech you approve of.

Well, hats of to you for doing such a great job! I have argued about the fact that you can't debate free speech with people who don't see that as a basic right for every citizen. You on the other hand, seem not to have any problems with this logic.

Now we are talking about a Holocaust denier and all you seem to be doing is circumventing the topic of the thread and pointing fingers at Muslims.

David Irving is not even on the same planet as the muslims. He represents a branch of our western, free speech society. He does not want to overtake our countries and bring in draconian laws that we repelled with the blood of our heroes. Why would you stifle him, but allow islamic preaching on the same land?

So, how about you then, SeanBM, would you allow David Irving to have guided tours in Auschwitz, unsupervised? Would you allow him to hold speeches at hotels, conference halls and in public, in which he debates the holocaust?

DariuszTelka
DariuszTelka   
25 Sep 2010
History / Should David Irving, Holocaust denier, be allowed to run tours to Poland? [246]

I used to think that radical muslims were more inclined to use violence, but I am afraid I had to revise my opinion. The thing that makes it more scary is that "we" are the target, so it threatens our "comfort zone" more directly.

Yes, Stu, I agree with you on many aspects! Crazy people among our own need to be dealt with accordingly! That's why we have developed a very extencive law system for our societies. It is specifically made to deal with our people, who have our culture and society as a foundation. The muslims come from klan-based societies, from societies that view the macho culture of honour and violence as the thing that solves problems, rather than a court and a judge. They laugh at our laws and sentences, and look upon our prisons as 4-star hotels and a notch in their "macho" belt.

So to import MORE crazy people is just that, crazy! If you have water in your basement, you don't put a hose on full pump and put it in the basement as well, do you?

If we are to open our borders, I want fully functional people, people that are mostly secular, at least in their every day life, people with degrees in engineering, science, medicine. People who will contribute and even elevate our societies. Many such people come from third world countries like India and parts of Asia. I'm sorry to say only a handful of the muslims qualify for this description. Note to SeanBM, jonni, Harry...I actually have a muslim doctor from Iran. He is great! But if he kept a woman in a burkha at his reception desk and demanded that my wife sit in the back when we go together to visit him, he would not see me again!

When it comes to the radical Christians, they live in a special world, and it's sad if they don't take part in the normal society, as the ones you described in Holland. We have a "bibel-belt" here in Norway too. Small churches every mile...."Holy fire of Jesus Christ chuch", or "The blessed church of the first saints", and so on....some weird names down there. A lot of homeschooling goes on there too. But as a counterpart to the muslims, they don't create "no-go zones" for non-christians in their areas, they don't sell drugs, they don't gang rape our young girls, they don't stab and kill people who critizise them, like happened to Pim Fortuyn and Theo van Gogh in Holland. The radical christians don't occupy an unproportionate percentage of jail cells for the things I just mentioned above. They don't demand governement funded churches being built with towers that dominate the skyline. They don't, like unfortunately many muslims do, honour-kill their daughters and mothers, or throw acid in their faces, scarring them for life. They don't claim financial support for children they don't have and scam the welfare system in every way possible. They don't fill up all the battered-women centres and mental health institutions. They don't like the muslims do, demand that we give them time off for their own holidays, the removal of Jesus and christmas carols from traditional christian celebrations, seperate swimming pools, muslim prayer rooms in every governmental workplace or at airports etc. They don't demand specially prepared foods, blessed by their religious leaders in schools, even in jail! They don't demand religiously seperated old peoples homes...the list is soooo long.

And if someone from the christian realm wants to quit, to enter the "atheist" society, they can do so without having to live under protected housing, using false names and being afraid their whole life. Because in christianity, denying your faith, is not punishable by death! Yes, there exists some christian cults who approach some very un-democratic ways of life, but they are so small in comparison with the general population, they are not the norm. As opposed to the muslims, in which their religion and holy book dictate their lives 24/7. They are obliged to follow it, or are punished by their society if they don't. It's the will of Allah....It's important to see and understand this difference!

There are many differences between radical christians and muslims, Stu...but as you said, we have our own bad apples! So, let's not import more, shall we? And IF WE DO, they have to swear an allegiance to our laws and our ways of life. They may not bring their whole klan mentality with them, and if they break any laws they will be returned! I personally would like to see the introduction of worker-programs on a time-litmited basis, as they have in Asia. You come for 3-5-7 years, you work, you send money back home, and then you leave...for home! For good!

SeanBM: About the introduction of islam to this thread, kind of sorry, Harry mentioned that I am a bigot and brush everyone with my brush of hate...so it kind of got off from there. But, I'll be more than happy to get back on the actual topic, although my comment was meant to illustrate that people who usually want to ban right wing opinion, usually have no problem letting violent and extreme muslims to have their say. But of course, it's easy for you to now use this an excuse not to actually have an opinion on this matter. And hey, who made you the dictator? I know how much you leftist like totalitarian systems, so go ahead, SeanBM.

DariuszTelka
DariuszTelka   
25 Sep 2010
History / Should David Irving, Holocaust denier, be allowed to run tours to Poland? [246]

Revisionists haven't, but "christians" have.

Yes, that's why I mentioned the medieavel times...we had our period of bloodshed and bigotry. We cleansed ourselves of it. How is it going to help us to reincarnate it through a different belief system today? If the catholic church did what islam does today, then I would oppose that too! I am not defending radical christians, if someone thinks that. Like that sect in the US that laughs and taunts dead soldiers at their funerals...wow, now there is real hate and bigotry if I ever saw it amongst our own.

We created the "New Testament", as opposed to the old one...I would hope that the muslims could make a "New Quran", that said, "Turn the other cheek" and "Love thy neigbour", and so on. Today we send spacecrafts to the outer limits of our galaxy, we have heart transplants, and universities full of academic freedom and knowledge. The muslim world has nothing that even comes close. This is because their religion controls their lives. Just like the catholic church controlled our lives back in their "glory" days. We learned from that, and evolved. How and when is the muslim world going to do this? They clearly state that they don't want to integrate or become like us. So why come here then? To make us like them...

Absolutely correct ... you know that it was the British who first used concentration camps. Hitler was just a "copy cat" (admittedly a very good one :S)

I even read Hitler copied his eugenics fascination from the americans that started in the early 1900's too...

DariuszTelka