The BEST Guide to POLAND
Unanswered  |  Archives 
 
 
User: Guest

Posts by szczeciniak  

Joined: 8 Sep 2009 / Male ♂
Last Post: 6 Dec 2010
Threads: Total: 4 / Live: 1 / Archived: 3
Posts: Total: 92 / Live: 38 / Archived: 54

Speaks Polish?: YES

Displayed posts: 39 / page 2 of 2
sort: Latest first   Oldest first   |
szczeciniak   
8 Oct 2009
Life / 3 reasons why you hate Poland. [1049]

go there , put up some kg! and than cama back and try to loss it!

i hate poland for that!!!

ps
beer, kieubasa on fire, szaszlik and beer again
szczeciniak   
6 Oct 2009
News / Do Poles in Poland really feel betrayed because there won't be any US Shield? [288]

do they have anything to substitute? Maybe polish made rockets? from bumar

euranet.eu/eng/Today/News/English-News/Poland-ponders-own-anti-missile-shield

So instead, the Obama administration is planning to deploy in Europe the existing ship-based Aegis defense system, which is designed to intercept short- and intermediate-range missiles with a range of up to 2,000 kilometers. According to the plan, the United States will develop and field interceptors against longer-range missiles in the future.

where in Europe would it be deploy?
is this the substitute KaczyƄski is calling for?
szczeciniak   
29 Sep 2009
News / Do Poles in Poland really feel betrayed because there won't be any US Shield? [288]

Obama Administration has made big fanfare about a so-called “reset” of US-Russian relations, it is clear the reset intended is back to the disastrous (for Russia) Yeltsin era of chaos and collapse of Russian state power in the early 1990’s. What is ignored are the clear strategic-based reasons for the dramatic deterioration in US-Russian relations—Washington and Washington-led NATO have posed an existential challenge to the very survival of Russia as a nation by Washington’s series of power coups or “color revolutions,” most clearly the 2003-2004 revolutions in Ukraine and in Georgia

Adding to the appearance as seen from Moscow that US intent is to ultimately destroy Russia was the US insistence, until now endorsed by Obama, to place highly offensive missile and radar installations into Poland and the Czech Republic, the mis-named US “ballistic missile defense.” As former US military experts have put it, missile defense is the key to nuclear first strike. Whether or not Obama definitively cancels the missile defense plans will be a decisive indication if serious US rethinking is possible or not.

Rather than continuing the confrontation with Russia in its own security sphere of Georgia or Ukraine, it would have to consider making concessions to Russian security concerns by negotiating an end to the US missile defense as Obama suggested in the campaign debates. The fact that the Czech press suggests that has just been decided, indicates a desperate internal attempt within the US power establishment to rethink fundamentals of America’s global strength. Cancelling missile defense and easing of NATO support in Ukraine and Georgia would open the door to urgently needed Russian cooperation for a US policy with Iran and Afghanistan.

Ironically, the US Government has just released its latest threat review. The US 2009 National Intelligence Strategy (NIS), a four-year blueprint for the intelligence services, cites Russia, China, Iran and North Korea as countries that "have the ability to challenge US interests," not only in traditional ways, such as military force and espionage, but also in "emerging" ways, in particular cyber operations. It noted, "Russia…may continue to seek avenues for reasserting power and influence in ways that complicate US interests."

no matter how weak Russia might appear economically, it would certainly make that challenge to US influence a self-fulfilling prophesy.
Russian newsmedia reported that Iran would receive an advanced Russian-made S-300 anti-aircraft system by the year's end that could help fend off any pre-emptive strikes against its nuclear facilities. The first deliveries are to begin this month and be completed within 12 months.

so it would be nice to have something like S-300 anti-aircraft system in poland and ukraine!!
or i may be wrong , and its all too late?
szczeciniak   
21 Sep 2009
News / Do Poles in Poland really feel betrayed because there won't be any US Shield? [288]

The military power with the best tanks, aircraft and ships doesn't always win a battle. Wars may be decided by many factors, including non-military factors.

The United States has been a great and stable power for many decades. One should never, on that account, assume the invincibility of the U.S. The American superpower has been strategically mismanaged for half a century. During the Cold War the U.S. suffered outright defeats in Cuba, Laos, Vietnam, and Cambodia. With the end of the Cold War came major Communist advances in South Africa (1994), Congo (1997), Angola (2002), Venezuela (1999), Brazil (2002), Bolivia (2006), and Nicaragua (2006).

Very simply, when one side in a global contest appears to give up, the psychological impact is enormous. Organize the collapse of Communism from the Kremlin itself and nobody in the West will question it. If the Communists are giving up power, it is all good. But look at Russia and Eastern Europe today. By giving up untenable positions in Germany and the Baltic States, the remainder is yet dominated by agent networks and mafias aligned with Moscow. In Ukraine, for example, there is a pro-NATO president whose power has been undermined by a prime minister who works for Moscow. In Georgia, the Russian troops press in while operations continue to unseat the pro-American president. In Poland, the Czech Republic, Hungary, Bulgaria and Romania old Communist structures dominate business and government. Despite their entry into NATO, some of these countries may be described as nests of spies and infiltrators whose mission has been to sabotage NATO from within. This is not simply conjecture, but the conclusion drawn by the best-informed political activists and researchers in Eastern Europe.

so the fact is poland needs defense system,
the question is whether poland will be allow to have one or any.
on its own will not have chance in case of confrontation with russia, but united with ukraine , lithuania and anther easter European states!!
yes, i think they can stand and keep big ugly bear in control.
US Shield is important, but not the only option of weapons on US disposal, but fastest to deploy and cheapest(in relative point)
only 5 countries have advance weapons(tesla weapans,or electro magnetic weapons)
it would of being nice for poland to became 6.
most likely not passable??
ps.
bears do not like electromagnetic pollution:-))))))
szczeciniak   
12 Sep 2009
News / Prediction: Poland to be World Superpower in XXI century [147]

starship commonwealth would be the flagship
than Uss ukraina and Lithuanian
next follow uss hungry and chech and slovacia
others as well and all this within next 40 years??

waw i wish i could see it.