Oathbreaker
19 Jul 2021
History / Did Poland bring on its own destruction in 1939? [71]
@Bratwurst Boy
True, they are known to be animalistic. I can't imagine anyone wanting to live the life of animals. The animals I like the most are the ones who changed due to interactions with humans, I would choose a cute Corgi over any wild wolf out there.
It's part of being a human being to fight ones own ego and beastly inclinations, to be a good parent and an upstanding citizen in society at large.
Which is paradoxical since many of the sexual drives are quite primordial so when it comes to such desires it clashes. Especially when they are extreme, I have met few people who seem to understand that.
Many think it's either one or the other, while I see it as a mix of both. Used in varying degree in different circumstances for a myriad of reasons. Through my own historical studies of human societies compared to animalistic ones and the human ones who tend to be the most savage seem to progress at an extremely slow pace.
Which only rebukes science as being opposed to religion, unless one tries to make it so
@Bratwurst Boy
True, they are known to be animalistic. I can't imagine anyone wanting to live the life of animals. The animals I like the most are the ones who changed due to interactions with humans, I would choose a cute Corgi over any wild wolf out there.
It's part of being a human being to fight ones own ego and beastly inclinations, to be a good parent and an upstanding citizen in society at large.
Which is paradoxical since many of the sexual drives are quite primordial so when it comes to such desires it clashes. Especially when they are extreme, I have met few people who seem to understand that.
Many think it's either one or the other, while I see it as a mix of both. Used in varying degree in different circumstances for a myriad of reasons. Through my own historical studies of human societies compared to animalistic ones and the human ones who tend to be the most savage seem to progress at an extremely slow pace.
Which only rebukes science as being opposed to religion, unless one tries to make it so