nott
16 Sep 2010
History / Should David Irving, Holocaust denier, be allowed to run tours to Poland? [246]
Well, then you are right, of course, I didn't know this definition.
For me it looks like censorship of science, though, staunch defence of a dogmatic canon. Consequently, Irving looks like Giordano Bruno.
Anyway, even if he claimed that no single Jew was killed during the WW2, then stupidity is not considered a crime, in general. Only in this very case - and the law is applied to people who actually have something to back up their claims.
edit: the discussion has livened up... as usual
Holocaust denial consists of claims that the genocide of Jews during World War II—usually referred to as the Holocaust[1]—did not occur at all, or that it did not happen in the manner or to the extent historically recognized. "
Well, then you are right, of course, I didn't know this definition.
For me it looks like censorship of science, though, staunch defence of a dogmatic canon. Consequently, Irving looks like Giordano Bruno.
Anyway, even if he claimed that no single Jew was killed during the WW2, then stupidity is not considered a crime, in general. Only in this very case - and the law is applied to people who actually have something to back up their claims.
edit: the discussion has livened up... as usual