History / 'Defamation': The Anti-Semism Industry & Poland [188]

What is it about? About the numbers of $$$$$ ? Then, check out top 100 richest people of USA, as I said above. They are not more than 10-15 people.

History / 'Defamation': The Anti-Semism Industry & Poland [188]

@Legend, I am not in USA, so I don't know who is who there, details of everybody, don't know even who is who here in Turkey. Having said this,

Stein, by saying Jews are everywhere in the media, probably made fun of people who repeat the same thing over and over "Jews are big powers, own whole media, etc etc."

Fox is a big company, so, of course, Jewish intellectuals too will work there. (for ex., there are several Armenian columnists in a newspaper here known with their islaimst views of newspaper owner. It is business, money, work. Same for Fox.)

So, counting a few Jews working at Fox media doesn't make Fox as a Jewish media. Fox owner is R. Murdoch, an immigrant from Australia, a son of Irish protestant parents. And, main politics of this media is drawn by the owner of company, Murdoch.

How many newspapers, tvs, radio, etc local and country-wise are there in USA with a population of 300 million? 10,000? How many of them can be belong to Jewish Americans who are 6 million people only, 2% of total population.? Lets say, they all are intellectuals, high level educated people and with some money.. So, my rough assumption is that they can't have more than 10% of all medias in USA.. So, 90% of media are belong to non-Jewish Americans. Maybe, you Americans see them such a small minority so successful that they may look like they are everywhere, and this illusion can be even done by some anti-Jewish media to hide their own huge media by fingering at the media of a minority. But, those Jews are very rich? Check out top 100 richest people in USA then and you will see they are not more than 10%.

Anyway.. It seems that their business rivals of Jewish Americans are playing Jewish card to make a trade/profit advantages for themselves as well. Since they are playing your belief feelings as well, it is probably effective on people who are religion oriented. If you mean power? Jews are not gun-men, not military-men and they are not sitting in front of money printing machines in the central banks..

History / 'Defamation': The Anti-Semism Industry & Poland [188]

Not to go off-topic further, I'll answer this only.


That's true, but, rather than protection, it was due to multi-cult, multi-religion character of Roman Empire. Problem was not about religions then, but, was about a weakening, a sliding down empire where many rebels were happening everywhere in Roman Empire borders. Roman Empire seeing its collapse slowly from inside attacked outside, Jerusalem, to be able to save itself, also due to rebels in Jerusalem as well as they were not really independent.. During such a period, Jesus appeared as a rebel men leader and people of Jerusalem (Jews) gave him to Roman Empire due to their fear of the empire and Roman Empire killed him.. But, he became a phenomenan in other regions from Spain to Anatolia and we see St Paul as another rebel man in 30-40 AD who mentioned about Christ at meetings wherever he went..

So, returning to the topic by connecting these past things to near past and today, there must be no-base for the hate between Jews and Christians. If there is any base for any hate, it can be only between Christians and Roman Empire as they were the ones who had fought each others for 2 centuries and more. But, again, they were nothing else than economy fights, fight against an empire.. After that invasion of Jerusalem, Jews were, have been always a small minority and they have been shown as targets by empires of the days, even today, as they have been a weak community..

History / 'Defamation': The Anti-Semism Industry & Poland [188]

It is not correct. Roman Empire had many troubles inside its borders before Christ too. Its relationships between Roman Empire and Jerusalem were sometimes good, sometimes bad. All these show there were instabilities in the region of Roman Empire as well as in neighbouring region. Of course, it is not a new thing that rebellion leaders against Empires in the history were called as gods, prophets, etc (I am looking into the past from history science, not from religion point of view.) Muhammad wasn't different actually, he was another kind of rebellion against somethings else in that period, 600-650 AD, at least, at the beginning.

(Allah or Eloah is a pagan god name before Abraham religions. Same for God, which comes from Gad, Gawd, another pagan god name pre-Abraham era.)

History / 'Defamation': The Anti-Semism Industry & Poland [188]

I should have said "almost clear."
It is based on my analysis of those days between 50 BC and 50-100 AD.

There were revolts everywhere during this period in Roman Empire region (in Spain today as autonomous, in Anatolia, etc) as well as neighbour regions like Jerusalem region. For example, St Paul who was a tent maker in Antiochia (Antakya, Turkey today) joined a revolt in Pisidian Antiochia (West Turkey) where poor folks were breaking water ducts in the city at the hill (Christianity term first time appeared there in this Pisidian Antiochia city. Around 50 AD.) St Paul was giving reference to Christ then as he probably also visited Jerusalem years ago as Antiochia is close to Jerusalem and St Paul's first referencing to Christ was most likely about revolt things in P. Antiochia, which was later considered as preach when Christianity were spreading into the Roman Empire as religion.


Okay, you say DNA studies show Askenazis are not descendant of Khazars and many Askenazi scholars say otherwise, also by giving DNA studies.

Not only Askenazi scholars, but also many other scholars from many other countries say the same, Askenazis are Khazar people. Sure, there are many who are anti-Israel and who try to make people convince in that Askenazis are Khazars so that they can claim Israeli people need to move away, out of Israel land today. But, they tell the truth like Askenazi scholars do..

(If you are an Israeli official, never mind, we here are ordinary folks and we all know official histories of all countries are partial, not exact and sometimes political. Israel being a country of Khazar people won't make, for ex, Arap kingdoms right as their roots too were somewhere else.)

History / 'Defamation': The Anti-Semism Industry & Poland [188]


About who Askenazis are, there is no any theory yet, that is universally accepted.. The oldest written source where you see Askenazi word is in old bible (Genesis 10:3 and I dont remember the other) and it is the name of one of three sons of Gomer grandson of Noah and his country is somewhere in the north, around Khazar sea. Based on this, religious scholars prefer to take reference to the bible only and political religionism cut it short by using its double meaning which means German Jews.

Cultural, linguistic and history studies show Askenazis moved from Khazar state after its collapse in 10th century. Sure, not universally accepted, but, there is no better theory than this theory yet..

(I can show two different DNA studies which tell different stories.)

History / 'Defamation': The Anti-Semism Industry & Poland [188]

DNA itself, relating to cultural identities, is a racism itself, scientific racism. Cultural identities such as Turkic, Pole, etc can not be traced by DNA studies. Anyway, this is another issue we can debate.


Proved untrue? Not at all. For example, the word Askenazi appears in written history sources first time in old bible and it's not known more than this though Hellens/Greeks claimed a lake name, an Iran/Persian historian ,n 11th c. claimed Khazar region people, etc etc. If you didn't like web site I gave, belong to an Askenazi historian, check out Wiki, you will see all theories of which none of them has been proved.

How you are talking is like talks of Israel officials. Official histories of countries may not tell a lot, or may cut short (as they do in translation/rooting of word, Askenazi as German Jewish, not to go long back in the history and to cut it short by telling their last locations.) - We here are not officials, so, our talks are purely talks of ordinary folks.


Wrong. Jews own 10% of media, but, since there are a small minority like 6 million in 300 million, you see them as if they are everywhere..

It is not so really important if Jesus himself was a Jew or not. He was in a tribe who are named Jews even today. What is clear to me is that Jesus was a leader in a revolt against Roman Empire of the day.

History / 'Defamation': The Anti-Semism Industry & Poland [188]

DNA doesn't mean much for two reasons: Mixtures have happened everywhere and gene domination may change from persons to persons and calibration references of such measurements like any measurement are not clear enough. It is like taking white as pure white as reference while it is actually pink.. Furthermore, nations such as Turkic etc are not racial, but, cultural identities.

10 million of 13 million Jews today are the descendents of the Khazars and they are known as Askenazi.

History / 'Defamation': The Anti-Semism Industry & Poland [188]


Lets look at the biggest medias; CNN, FOX, BBC, yahoo, etc
None of them are Jewish media.
No need to count tens of tousands of local medias belonging to non-Jew media comparing with tens of medis belonging to Jews.

You know all these.. but, you interpreate bias-ly.


Whether elit or not, they were known as Jewish anyway. And, Jesus was from such parents. But, what's important is not whether Jesus was Jew or not , what's important is he was killed by Roman empire forces who were neither Jews nor there was Christianity that time as Jesus was revolting against Roman Empire. So, there is no hate actually between Jews and Christians. Neither with Muslims as they appeared 6 century later.


You are reading their dream of Israel about their invasion of big lands, but, when it comes to Americans or Russians, theirs are good dreams, securing those huge lands against 15 million people only while themselves are 500,000 millions and even more.


Khazar State (6-11 th century) was a Jewish state (though other religions too existed.) Ok, they were Turkic people and their name Askenazi comes from a Turkic myth (which also appears in old Bible.) So what? Turkic people were not converted to Islam only, to Judaism as well, to Christianity as well. Europe were not Christians either till 200-300 AD.. Sure, Israel land was granted by UN, but, not for free, paid by the gold, i.e. by money. It is not different than your buying a land for your house today. Expression such as "Granted by God" is a religious term, not different than saying Church or Mosque or houses or lands in general are granted by God..

Erol (aka Nomad.)

History / 'Defamation': The Anti-Semism Industry & Poland [188]


You are repeating same bla bla that has been repeated everywhere. There is no logic in that 6 millions will be more powerful than 294 millions. Media power of non-Jews is 10 times more than Jewish media. Non-Jew rich people there in US are just hiding themselves against evil eyes of 300 million by putting Jews upfront so you all can blame them as you see them rich people while you don't see much more richer people behind the scenes.


Sure, every religious scholars talk good about their own religions, so do Jewish religious scholars, so do Christians and so on. But, history is history. Till 200-300 AD, the main hate was between Roman Empire and folks revolting against the empire. When Christianity spreaded among folks, those folks blamed Jews as they claimed Jews sold Jesus to Roman Empire forces. Jesus was a Jew anyway and he was revolting against Roman Empire. Later, when Rome became Christ-ian, they kept blaming Jews while their ancestors Romans did kill Jesus.


Ah dreams.. Russia want to own whole Asia, USA want to own whole America, Britain want to own whole Europe and the world, etc. Did you see Jews were owning those places in your dream? It was a nightmare for you then.

Erol (aka Nomad.)

History / 'Defamation': The Anti-Semism Industry & Poland [188]


Yes, so. There are about 15 millions Jews in the world, about 70% of them are Askenazis and 30% are Sephardis.

Khazar was empire if the empire means big, powerful state - if it means large (with states, autonomous regions, with different nations, etc inside), no, Khazar wasn't an empire.

History / 'Defamation': The Anti-Semism Industry & Poland [188]

And, people who say 50+ million of us died, but, from Jews, 3-5 millions only.

Non-Jews at war were about 1 billion. So, 50+ million is 5% only.
while 3-5 millions of Jews were 50% of Jews.
And, Jews were not even at war, the war wasn't even their war.

(actually, the war wasn't the war of all 1 billion of ordinary people either, but, of oil-war-lords.. who are richly living in monarchies even today.)

History / 'Defamation': The Anti-Semism Industry & Poland [188]


Are Jews responsible of death of 50 more million people too?

You miss the point. Jews were a civil community someones like gypsies who are not involved in the war. You will support the war and when 50+ million people die, you expect Jews to cry for them too. What about you? What you saying is something like that "... hey, Jews, you have been killed many many less than us non-Jews... so, don't complain and die more like us, fools.."


English is your first language? I said Askenazis are folks of Israel today. Ashkenazis are descendents of Khazar State (not an empire, but, a big state), a Turkic state with different religions from Tengrism, to Judaism, to Christianity to Islam. All Turkic people.

Friendship of Turkey and Israel is not due to that. It is due to strategic reasons, but, more important than this, due to civil way of economic relations.

History / 'Defamation': The Anti-Semism Industry & Poland [188]


Maybe, the better question is "whose victim is that girl" rather than why Jew didn't film her. (what if she is a victim of an anti-Jew forces? Quite often, such things happening in Palestine, victimizing people there and throwing guilt to Jews.)

History / 'Defamation': The Anti-Semism Industry & Poland [188]


So, are there no another film maker who can film that girl if she isn't Jew?
I guess there are many. Jews are 15 million people only in the world while non-Jews (should we say Christians and Muslims?) are 2-3 billion people. So, there are tousands of film makers who are non-Jews. If film makers are not making films about a victim non-Jew girl, then, no one believes all those morons..

History / 'Defamation': The Anti-Semism Industry & Poland [188]

As a reply to my post above (re to Murdoch), someone sent me a link privately that implies Murdoch is a Jew:

jewwatch.com/jew-entertainment-news-monopoly-murdoch-jew-part1.html

There are web pages claiming opposite. From my analysis and observations, Robert Murdoch is not a Jew at all. He was born in a CommonWealth country, Australia, a country where criminals were deported by Britain in the past and he was a son of protestant Irish parents. Showing him as Jew can be only a propagand of Britain (perhaps, due to some old fights between monarchy and him.)

History / 'Defamation': The Anti-Semism Industry & Poland [188]


If you didn't believe he wasn't a Jew, you wouldn't post your this post, would you?

Sorry, but, parents of Robert Murdoch were protestant Christian Irish people. So, he is not a Jew.

History / 'Defamation': The Anti-Semism Industry & Poland [188]

You said it. This is why them (monarchies) don't contribute any development.
They don't take tax only, they also sit in front of money printing machines.


Those 50+ millions who died during WWII too were their faults of Jews? Eh..
Jewish intellectuals (Marx, etc) had introduced such a good system called socialist economy and they initiated Soviets.. But, Russians' nationalism arised quickly again and Russian nationalists controlled Soviets starting in 1930s..

Later, Abraham religion believers (religious Jews, Christians and Muslims) allied and they all called those Jewish intellectuals as atheists although they were no more power in Soviets anymore. Those elite Jews never mentioned about their beliefs, they just didn't say they were believers of one of these Abraham religions..

(btw, I often read the term zionism as if it is a bugaboo.. The term Zion-ism goes back to 9th century (a written source in 10-11th century by a Persian historican mentions this term, zionism). This 9th century was an era of Khazar State where Khagan, leader of state and his tribe was converted to Judaism.. It is normal as they'd like to visit the hill Zion in Jerusalem as hajj.. It is like visiting St Mariam Church in Ephesus by Catholics, Mecca by Muslims, etc.. Zionism is nothing else than a religious hajj term..

History / 'Defamation': The Anti-Semism Industry & Poland [188]


I can imagine.. It can be like old Poland, or old Germany, etc - an ordinary country with no developed science, technology, industry, etc.

(it is the financial capital that drives these developments - not the monarchic nor the covboy capital.)

History / 'Defamation': The Anti-Semism Industry & Poland [188]


I viewed same and am provoked to say these.
This defamation film is filmed probably to divide the Israel into two different communities that actually already exist as Ashkenazis and Sephardics. Most of Sephardis had not lived catastrophe during those bad days in the history as Sephardis were mostly elsewheres, not in Europe. Time has changed, everybodys are trying to make money from everythings and ideologies, etc are nothing else than money making fields anymore. Not bad. But, this money movement also needs to enter the monarchic ideologies as well - or, I won't take such films etc as cordial.

News / CO2 emissions in Poland. Should Poland go nuclear or stick with clean coal technologies? [59]


There is a saying here "denize dusen, yilana sarilir" (writing it in turkish so that maybe google can translate better)

It means "a person who falls into the sea/marsh sticks to the snake."

This oil/petrolium (or, in other words, CO2 emission) is like that.
People who fell in the oil marsh are sticking to the nuclear energy as alternative to the oil.

This is a result when the monarchy exists as their scholars try to save their monarchy system at all costs.

Oil/petrolium is something, nuclear is somethings else.
They are not alternatives to each others.
Let me explain it simply, using medical field.

Oil/petrolium is used in plastic serum hoses, too, for ex.
while nuclear energy can be used in another field.
When you burn the oil, you are burning your own serum hoses you may need in emergency cases.

News / CO2 emissions in Poland. Should Poland go nuclear or stick with clean coal technologies? [59]

Before.. Sure. If not, if they build, they will be another one in nuclear plant marsh. (you with nuclear plants, you are pulling their legs of Poles too into nuclear marsh - to save yourselves out of marsh, you needed to follow Poland.. But, by pulling them too into nuclear marsh, you are not saving yourselves.. just this shows how your monarchy Europe are stupids..)

News / CO2 emissions in Poland. Should Poland go nuclear or stick with clean coal technologies? [59]

Ok - returning to the topic.

I see here civil organizations like greenpeace, etc who are joining protests against nuclear plant projects plans in Turkey. Yesterday, an important person of EU too critisized Turkey's planned nuclear plant projects badly.

I got their advices and agree with them fully.

Since nuclear issue is not a country based issue, but, a regional issue, even more, a global issue, I am saying the same thing to Poland here (I also emailed to Polish energy company about their nuclear energy project.)

Now, I will go further.. Following advices and critics of important person of EU rightly, I highly critisize EU countries about their already existing nuclear plants. They need to close all nuclear plants in Europe.. Hope, I also see that important person of EU who critisized Turkey's nuclear plant plan also critisizes Europe about their nuclear plants and force them, especially monarchies to close their nuclear plants IMMEDIATELY..

News / Parliament in Poland clears way for nuclear plant [78]


How? Even poor Armenia has nuclear plant.

Life / New Polish generation prefers black culture? [145]


I don't see that.. Black people in Poland are a minority with some differences of course. If you are in a forest of, say, apple trees, and if there are a few pear trees in this apple forest, you may think everywhere is a lot of pear trees..

Similar perceive can be seen in South Africa too where a minority are white people and majority are black people.. Maybe, people there in South Africa relate whites to being richness as the white are riches there and this might have been transferred to the north, Europe.. However, if you are in NBA basketball field, whites are poors.

(btw, naming darker skin people as black and lighter skin people as white are wrong - there is no white skin people and no black skin people. White people are pink skin people mostly.)

News / Parliament in Poland clears way for nuclear plant [78]

I knew two of them; Mersin tender was won by Russia company and Sinop was won by Japan Toshiba. I don't see any news about Toshiba lately. I heard Russians (Duma) approved realization of Russia company's nuclear plant in Mersin. Since this second seems to be sooner, there have been big protests here by locals and by country people in Mersin. (Were they organized by some anti-nuclear-ists? who are maybe actually against Russian's win of the tender there? or by anti-Turkeys who are against nuclears in Turkey? Just because anti-Turkey centers who already have nuclears in their own countries said nuclears are bad, there is no need to oppose them,, they already know they did bad.. and I already knew it was bad before.) Their behaviours are like that; we fell in marsh, you too, fall in marsh - Stupids.. If I too fall in marsh, how will you save yourself? Like that.. Buying nuclear is somethings like that in today world. They should close their nuclears which already exist..

While you are in marsh, in a nuclear marsh, a very risky technology, your questioning about from where to get energy is meaningless.. I'll say this.. Even petrolium is not an energy source actually. Just because people use it so, by burning in engines, etc., it doesn't mean petrol is energy source really. For me, for ex., it is plastic source.. When you start to think in such different directions, you can see that petrolium is considered as power tool for some stupids who are politicians in general and especially monarchies in particular rather than energy source need.. If it were considered as energy source, they wouldn't have killed millions of people.. They are in marsh of nuclear now and they are pulling our legs into nuclear tech. If you buy it, you too find yourself in nuclear marsh. Then, we alltogether can start to pray once we too find ourselves in this marsh..

News / Parliament in Poland clears way for nuclear plant [78]

I know. Tender resulted and one of these projects was given to Japan Toshiba, one to Russia and one to ? (I dont know this third - two are known / fixed.) Japan Toshiba (one of biggest in this nuclear plant in this field, who also bought shares of Westinghouse some years ago if I am not wrong) gone into silence after Japan nuclear plants things. Russia already passed their law about constructing a plant in Turkey and they plan to build the nuclear.

And, people, I heard 160 km of people forming a chain against nuclear in Mersin city. What these people are doing is correct. I can think of political games of bigs of world, but, they are trying to sell their stupidity to everywhere. If you buy it, you will have to close sooner or later.. Bigs too will have to close their nuclear plants sooner or later.. Or, since this is political game rather than energy need, I can guarantee you there is a nuclear world war in the horizon soon.. Such a world war can not be done twice. If they are interested in world war, they don't need to wait.. They can press on the buttons and they can crash nuclear plants so that radiation can be released..

I can prove renewable energies are better, much cheaper and its source is infinite comparing to such energy sources like petrol, nuclear, etc - but, they won't understand.. What they can understand is the power only. Hence, the destiny is nuclear world war.. We don't need another nuclear weapon nor nuclear plant for that. There are many already in the world..

News / Achievements of the Tusk's Polish government [532]


Among these, nuclear plant is a need for Poland (project), Germany and France.
But, for UK and Russia? No... They have petrolium and/or gas sources enough.
So, UK and Russia have nukes only for power, as weapons..
If there happens an anti-nuclear agreement, who should close nuclear plants first? Not France, not Germany, etc - but, either UK or Russia.

Advicing Tusk about this is meaningless under these conditions.

News / Parliament in Poland clears way for nuclear plant [78]

I have seen civil organization activities much here including Greanpeace's - about nuclear...
It is not wrong to see them here (I too am anti-nuclear, am anti-petrolium-monopol-wilds as well), but, when I don't see them in Europe - it is suspectful organization, a biased organization..

Do you try to stop a nuclear plant project or do you try to close existing nuclear plants? Greenpeace-like organizations are trying to stop projects while they doing nothing about plants which already exist. They lost credit in my eyes. Anyway, their this bias didn't stop people here who are protesting a project plan.. When I read this news about Poland, I understood that Poland is forced to do the same mistake by countries who already done mistake by building nuclear plants..

News / Parliament in Poland clears way for nuclear plant [78]

I know the last anti-nuclear protests in Germany about a month ago.
But, I am not hearing any activity of Greenpeace like organizations in other bigs of Europe, such as UK, France, etc. These Greenpeace organizations show themselves only in smaller countries or only in countries where there is no nuclear plant? There is a very old nuclear plant in Armenia and it is threatening everywhere, from Russia to Turkey to Europe. But, there is no activity of Greenpeace there either.. Among all these countries, UK's position is nonunderstandable. They already keep control of petrol lands in Middle East. So, they don't need nuclear energy actually as France or Poland need.