The BEST Guide to POLAND
Unanswered  |  Archives [3] 
  
Account: Guest

Posts by Olaf  

Joined: 29 Oct 2009 / Male ♂
Last Post: 31 May 2013
Threads: Total: 6 / Live: 1 / Archived: 5
Posts: Total: 955 / Live: 199 / Archived: 756
From: Kraków
Interests: Heating up some controversial topics?

Displayed posts: 200 / page 3 of 7
sort: Latest first   Oldest first   |
Olaf   
11 Jan 2011
Law / Starting a private kindergarten in Poland [44]

The after school clubs could be a good option, but location is the key here: you have to have this club close to some business centre where they have shift work. Find the centres located in the cities you are interested in. By the way, where do you plan to do it, which city?
Olaf   
10 Jan 2011
Food / Is brain-damaging vegan fad growing in Poland? [176]

I think you're right Barney. I'd only liket to expand this:

Animals were not meant to be grown in near factory conditions requiring a cocktail of medicines and applications to keep them outwardly healthy.

to the fact that so is with the veggie food. Fruit & vegetables can (and are in the US and outside) be genetically modified, grown on pesticides, some harmful artificial fertilizers, like some nitrites etc. So non-meat diet can - and often is artificial too.
Olaf   
10 Jan 2011
Food / Is brain-damaging vegan fad growing in Poland? [176]

You can easily get enough protein and iron (if that's whatt you're saying) from a vegetarian diet. More care is needed but it can be done - no room for fussy eaters in vegetarianism either.

I agree to this, but not entirely - it is not that easy to have a balanced diet without meat, as meat was originally in our diet and should be there. Not too much though.

Well maybe he was a vegetarian with a poor diet? They exist, just as meat eaters with poor diets exist. How many regular consumers of animal fat have premature heart attacks? A good deal more than vegetarians anyway I'll warrant.

True. But what is a "premature" heart attack;)? If I'm 66 years old (no matter the diet) - is it the right time to have a heart attack? ;)
Olaf   
10 Jan 2011
Law / Starting a private kindergarten in Poland [44]

POKL book

I got it from one of the local advice centres on EU funds. But most of the details are on their website too: efs.gov.pl/english/Strony/default.aspx

It took me really long to get deep enough into selecting any of those programmes and actually get to know anything, butonce you do - it'll be much easier and also there is free consultancy service at regional info offices (on appointment) and I'd advise you to get an appointment there but be prepared for the meeting or it'll be a waste of time. They can help a lot but you must know what in details you want to do, so do your homework before, make a business plan and this will be the best start for you getting those funds.

About what I dug out: let me know what you need exactly, I may have information on requirements, different childcare facilities statuses and funding. I guess it's too much to post everything here at random.

3.Possibilities of funding

- to add to what I wrote there are 3 formal statuses of a childcare facility that can be sponsored. Fourth kind is something like a private "children club" - not much requirements, no restrictions and no subsidy either. It would just be a company providing service of childcare. The methods of external financing of the three I mentioned are below. Note that the numbers in PLN apply to Krakow and they are different in each gmina.


  • Here's someething from my old files.
Olaf   
9 Jan 2011
Law / Starting a private kindergarten in Poland [44]

Indeed:). Apart from spending loads of time on the official internet websites on funding childcare facilities, I have a thick book about this POKL [EU fund] and I roughly know how it goes - but never I have seen 90% funding. I know for example that the project can be within the rang of 200.000 - 2.000.000 PLN but it's never returned that major part as 90%...
Olaf   
9 Jan 2011
Law / Starting a private kindergarten in Poland [44]

Me too, I havent heard of such a programme from POKL, and as far as I remember POKL is the only source of money from the EU that can be used for this purpose? Then you have to choose the right programme and detailed point under which you would try to get the money for the business. Only three of them were close to things such as childcare...
Olaf   
7 Jan 2011
Law / Starting a private kindergarten in Poland [44]

Wouldn't this mean meeting all the requirements, such as disabled access, etc?

- of course, once you meet all the requirements - only then it is accepted and you can register, I took it fofr granted it was obvious, otherwise if you don't meke it for the non-public status you can have a different form of chldcare for different (lower) funding - 45% for a kindergarten group for example.

I know what you mean with those existing kindergartens/nurseries in spare classrooms, but here it's the details that matter and if you open new ones, it may depend greatly on the SanEpid people, they are the biggest "threat" to opening this business - them and the fire dept.

Dangelo, I'll look for some more information just give me a couple of days maybe and I'll dig it out. It's been some time since I delved these issues.
Olaf   
7 Jan 2011
Law / Starting a private kindergarten in Poland [44]

Funding depends on a few things, such as the status of the facility. If you meet all the requirements and acquire the non-public status, you can then get 80 % of monthly cost of maintaining a child in a public kindergarten. That cost of one child in a public one is calculated in each gmina and is usually around 500-650 zł. So you could get 80% of similar amount per one child per month from the local gov't.
Olaf   
31 Dec 2010
News / A devestating verdict on the Polish church [279]

Well, lets have a vote on this one !

A vote on changing constitution? Hah! There is a Trybunał Konstytucyjny - are you a member of it?

Evangelical atheists/agnostics

- What in the name of Dark Lord is an Evangelical atheist?

On the other hand clergy doesn't pretend to be pure, where that silly idea coming from?

- No? They reserve the monopoly for saying what is right and pure and true. They are like modern fashion designers: you won't wear those clothes because they are unwearable, not practical and look like from outer space, only look interesting on a catwalk and not in everyday live. But still they determine the trends! Look down at the pic.

priests, knowing the Bible, have a duty to serve those that they take money from.

You are confusing internal Catholic Church matter and external CC matter. Church's members may ask about finances, non-members may not.

Not confusing anything. And not only members can ask since every tax payer's money goes to RCC. I wrote this before - you don't have a choice. So one CAN ask why and not like it.

Secular country means that states is no interfering into religious matters - thats all!

- ...and this secular country sets and keeps the boundaries for any Church from interferring in matters not being religion's agenda.

anti-religious aggression

WHERE is thie agression exactly?

a single priest I interact with

apocalypsecartoons.com/fathertucker/fathertucker.html

but also members of other Christian churches, like Orthodox or Protestant. So your argument is just ridiculous.

Not all of them, they celebrate the ones common, The onec not supported by RCC are not holidays.

Removing from public spaces everything religious is not as you try to persuade fair

- YOh, because one needs to be reminded about their duties to their faith at each step? Does the faith need to be promoted this way and be reminded of? Is it that effervescent that if you don't put a cross or mount giant screaming loudspeakers OUTSIDE a church to wake up all neighbourhood, people will forget that they are supposed to follow?


  • Ain't that practical?
Olaf   
30 Dec 2010
News / A devestating verdict on the Polish church [279]

However, criticism against them has been mounting for quite a long time now and they need this transparency drive to restore some shreds of credibility.

Restore some shreds of credibility? Szonuś, nobody gives a damn to gain credibility in the eyes of secular non-believers like you.

- Well, if they want to have respect and credibility they should take care of this, shouldn't they.
Besides, Bzibzioh (always wanted to know if that's your name or what?) If I understood you correctly, you are not being fair here: if you say that nobody gives a damn what secular non-believers think, then why the secular non-believers should take any interest in what the believers think? If so, then all religious symbols and national holidays and everything religious should be removed form public spaces etc. just to be fair and not promote any one religion, and keep to the constitution of Poland which says it is a secular country, not religious one. See, I'm not saying it should be done to such a major extent, but would be fair if we "didn't give a damn"...
Olaf   
30 Dec 2010
Food / Is brain-damaging vegan fad growing in Poland? [176]

Hunting? If it's wrong to eat animals it's wrong to eat plants. A guy's gotta eat.

Hah, good one! :)
What's that argument that killing animals is inhumane and that's why we should not eat them? Animals are animals, humans are humans - treating animals as humans (humane treating?) is... weird at least. I treat my dog as a dog, and that is how he knows where his place is in his "herd", which does not mean that I don't take care about the dog or any other animal. I like all animals, snails, frogs, dogs (well cats - not really), cows, pigs and mice. If I see animal in need - I take it to a vet or feed. But I also eat some of them, simple as that [but never the ones I helped out;)]. Vegetarians/vegans and other food "sects" live in a world of fantasy I guess, but that's completly up to them as long as they don't call regular people animal killers or something.

My food eats their food:)

I've read somewhere that the human body and teeth are more suitable towards vegetables and fruits.

This is really simple: by biology humans are OMNIVOROUS and our teeth are both for chewing and biting, we have both fangs and incisors.

Moderation is the key.

- Exactly. Too much meat isn't good, but eating just plants is plain stupid if you have acces to meet. You can't have a BALANCED diet without it, but you can eat meat products rarely and be fine.
Olaf   
30 Dec 2010
News / A devestating verdict on the Polish church [279]

And you know who falls for the trick withcarrot on the stick? An ass! :D

I will keep that in mind! BTW, I once made bimber alkohol and it was haluva good:)

When a majority fo people follow or try to follow the essence of Christiniaty -- the 10 Commandments and 8 Beatitudes

The rules in commandaments etc. are just adopted from much older religions and/or social and ethical rules and schools. Religion may help some people (a lot of them actually) to keep within "the good" boundaries, but it is not invented by religion. Also, I think we all can admit that religion does not prevent any better from wrongdoing.
Olaf   
29 Dec 2010
Life / Best place to buy cigarettes in Warsaw? [23]

Best way is to swiftly exchange cash with your one hand and take the box of fags with the other;) I know not any better way. Ask for PAPIEROSY.
Olaf   
28 Dec 2010
News / A devestating verdict on the Polish church [279]

Well that scares some people as well. But as Torq said, it's about living eternally outside of ones mortal coil and where matters such as time, simply don't exist. Goes back to the Einstein-ian question of what really makes up time, and if there truly is a "forever".

Babinich said that actually.

it's about living eternally outside of ones mortal coil and where matters such as time, simply don't exist.

- So... what is the point for ths anyway? Is this the ultimate goal for some? It seems rather pointless.

"forever".

- yep, very scary notion;)

Since when does biology prove all there is to know and beyond? Not even quantum physics can do that. Biology concentrates on what it partially knows of the mortal life here on earth.

So far biology & science, could prove all it found/discovered/invented - and it's been progressing like that since it started, while religion did not manage to prove a thing of what it claims. Howwever, biology, evolution and generally science did prove religion to say bollocks from time to time.

In a simple match: point to science ;)
I don't want to look at it as a simple match though, but you have to admit that science, i.e. what you know as facts, is something that you can rely on whereas the rest - ...

God lives!

Satan

yeah riiiight...

Batman, Superman, Snowwhite, Bambi and Hercules and Xena as well!
All in our heads.
Remember this one thing: when you talk to god, it is a prayer, but when go talks to you - you are insane. Why is that?
Olaf   
28 Dec 2010
News / A devestating verdict on the Polish church [279]

I would be most happy not to be included

I can stop writing your nicks in one line, for a very competetive price!

I was educated and brought up with the principle that your belief is your own business.

Ok, I am also for it. But here, under this thread we discuss different views right? No one forcing us at any point.

If you think that Torquemada and the Inquisition were the right way to go, how does this make you different from let us say Al-Quaeda? They also divide the world in infidels and believers, whereas the infidels have to ged rid off.

Who are you asking actually? Inquisition the right way to go? Who thinks that? Not me certainly. And the divisions you mentioned - each side is creating them. If you choose a religion to follow you start dividing (most of cases).

When you really get into Christianity

- I already did. I was raised in it. Also later I read much more on religions and Christianity (I guess much more than average Catholic). Thanks for the book, I might read soon it actually.
Olaf   
28 Dec 2010
News / A devestating verdict on the Polish church [279]

You surely have a strange attitude for someone who would just "like to know"

- Ok, apologies for that, I didn't mean to sound like that.

Imagine aaaaaall the peeeeeeople, liiiiiiiiving foooooooor toda-a-a-a-y... aa... aaa

- Now look what you've done! The song is now in my head for the rest of the day, you bad, bad man. And I don't even like this one. Arrrghhhh....

gone long time ago, or too busy

- Yup, funny as it may seem, I am far from those hippie views. But it is true I am having too much time now:) but what you expect at this time of year - I'm not selling fireworks:D

No judgement? No punishment for your sins? You just die and that's it? Your conscience
is gone and you don't even know that you're dead? No standing in front of the living God
to face His judgement on you?

- Pretty much. It is biology, that's all. But the rules you mentioned are good and they keep life in order. That's why it's good to follow them. And ethics is not to get the prize in afterlife (or avoid punishment) but because it is just and humane. It does not cost and it is not to get some profits later.

I mean, I BELIEVE it doesn't work that way

- I must say you seem one of the few people who can write about religion logically and interrestingly. I will not be teasing you anymore;)

Peace :)

Who's the hippie now? :D

Imagine Yellow Submarine with Olaf on board :D

- Better not! The vessel would sink with me on board.
Olaf   
28 Dec 2010
News / A devestating verdict on the Polish church [279]

Who is destined to feed the flames of hell, as you put it, is a part of knowledge possesed only
by God.

Guys, seriously, hell? Hell is a notion used to scare and control people. Heaven is to give hope. These are main and best-selling products of Christian churches and other religions. I don't intend to convince you to anything, but imagine for a minute, what if there is no hell, and no heaven, no purgatory either (what the heck is that invention - beats me), and after death you are dead and put to ground and decompose (or cremated and put on a mantelpiece in a coffee can). You are gone. End of story, and no problems! Eternal life? Don't bul**it me, I wouldn't want to live forever - would you? Really? That would be so boring and repeatable and... scary. Hopeless. How does this view present to you, Torq, Bimber and Sobieski? I'd like to know [I am not teasing anyone here].
Olaf   
27 Dec 2010
News / A devestating verdict on the Polish church [279]

If you can prove it - it’s science, not faith.

- Yes, facts or myths. Everyones personal choice...

Faith without credibility or validity is blind-faith/superstition

Very true.

That's what faith is all about: it should be blind by definition.

Some people prefer to keep their eys open.

They're all Semites.

Exactly. It's like Poles and Czechs also brothers.
Olaf   
24 Dec 2010
News / A devestating verdict on the Polish church [279]

Belief is not truth,

- Very true! I'm glad you wrote that. Either you KNOW or you BELIEVE. This is fundamental difference between believers [in anything, even spaghetti monster]

Aramic (primitive version of Arabic

Aramaic. Not primitive version of Arabic, different language, precedessor of Hebrew and Arabic. But apart from this linguistic bit - I really liked what you wrote. Thanks.

A place where people visit for nothing more than very materialistic and selfish purposes.

- as one said: They gather once a week to compare clothing. :)

Yet, they call themselves Catholic. They make me sick.

- Maybe this is today's version of a Catholic? I know decent ones, really but vast majority is not even close to the ideals they supposedly cherish.
Olaf   
23 Dec 2010
News / A devestating verdict on the Polish church [279]

however monies for the Chruch are given on voluntary basis

- Not true. If you pay taxes in Poland, you contribute to the RCC too inevitably, whether you like it or not.

divisions are there regardless !

- So creating more instead of diminishing is ok? Congrats.
Olaf   
23 Dec 2010
News / A devestating verdict on the Polish church [279]

I just don't like you outsiders

- Outsiders, insiders - soon there is better people, worse people, black, white, brown, etc. - As I said, this creates divisions! Where's the "love thy brethren" attitude, huh?

if you are not part of the church and you live in Poland it still does affect you

- Yes, totally. It affects everyone in Poland politically, financially, socially and legally. That's not secular Poland as in constitution (I think there is written Poland is a secular country).
Olaf   
23 Dec 2010
News / A devestating verdict on the Polish church [279]

I wonder how many of the "churchists" have actually read it?

From what I see and read around - not many. Also few actually read the Bible, and other sources they should know well. But instead some people here [not all, some;) ] don't even follow the more well known Christian guidelines to love thy brother and spill loads of hate when other people ask questions and reflect on the questionable deeds of the Church.
Olaf   
23 Dec 2010
News / A devestating verdict on the Polish church [279]

go on jerk off some more for all to see what you really are ....sickos !

Somebody is loosing nerves here. As always.

I see that so called atheist love to talk about the Church 1

Are you then a "so called churchist"?? ;)

Ironside, why wouldn't someone want to discuss such major social and political matters? Since the Church is visible and is acting in these arenas speaking for the rest of the people (e.g. lobbying on enforcing laws that would concern everyone) - why deprive some people the right to speak about the Church? Is it taboo for you?
Olaf   
23 Dec 2010
News / A devestating verdict on the Polish church [279]

That would definitely

gain huge respect from all

I guess. The Church would take away at least one major point from their opponents and show that their attitude is appropriate.
Olaf   
23 Dec 2010
News / A devestating verdict on the Polish church [279]

Seeing and molesting are 2 very different things.

In other parts of the same Bible, seeing in this context was used as having sex, so it is very likely Ham had abused his father.
Olaf   
22 Dec 2010
News / A devestating verdict on the Polish church [279]

Ohhhh please;) Aliens? Anyway, this actually can be more probable than visit of arch-potent, mighty angels, black-ops specialist in mission from God to destroy two cities (one angel wasn't enough? was there one for each city, or one was responsible for sulphur and the other was good with matches?).

And the sex-urge driven crowd wanted to screw... two aliens?? How did they even know that aliens were well... effable:D? Wow, that would be their life achievement! :D
Olaf   
22 Dec 2010
Life / Stubborn Polaks, anyone knows? [77]

Polak

is not the same as Pollack, the first one is a Polish word, the latter being derogative English.
Objectively, it doesn't look good when Poles call themselves Polacks. It shows some problem with either integrity or lack of bit of pride out of being a Pole.