The BEST Guide to POLAND
Unanswered  |  Archives [3] 
  
Account: Guest

Posts by Ironside  

Joined: 26 Feb 2009 / Male ♂
Warnings: 1 - A
Last Post: 14 hrs ago
Threads: Total: 53 / Live: 27 / Archived: 26
Posts: Total: 13641 / Live: 7030 / Archived: 6611
From: The Royal Palace of Warsaw
Speaks Polish?: Better than most

Displayed posts: 7057 / page 195 of 236
sort: Latest first   Oldest first   |
Ironside   
19 Jun 2013
Life / Professional feminists' of Poland meet-up [631]

But to answer it, the very foundation of the church is SUPPOSED TO BE based on the love, selflessness, compassion, sharing and forgiveness, NOT luxury.

Gee what luxury? The only thing that can be pointed out are cars - good cars but by no means lavish or luxurious. So, priests have good cars which are need for them to make their work efficient.

So what? should they all ride on donkeys to satisfy your fancy?
Anyway Are you Catholic that you are presuming on the role of the RCC? Did you write a latter to your bishop?
Ever heard about policy - no pay no say? Do you support financially your local parish?
If not keep your worthless opinion to yourself Sir.

after he said that the Church should be for the poor,

the Church is for all delph.
Ironside   
19 Jun 2013
Life / Professional feminists' of Poland meet-up [631]

Those people earn their money, rather than begging it from the gullible.

Are you telling us that politician is Poland (or elsewhere) are really earning their keep? Living form the taxpayers and it is been worse they force them to pay taxes. Strangely enough I haven't heard you ***** at them nor the EU bureaucrat who doing nothing but making the life difficult for an average Joe.

Each of them makes a lot more than any priest would ever make.
Also saying that priest do not work for their keep is the biggest and vilest ideologically biased lie I even heard bar Soviets lies. You Harry are like ideologically blinded mad dog.

Two reasons

Save that rubbish for gullible.

No, you can't justify this with that. Except politicians, all the other 'professions' you mentioned 'produce' a lot of money.

Polson - son ?politicians produce money like print them? what? that the joke of the day mate!
Not to mention all politically related perks and jobs for few who do not do much just enjoy a good life.
Ironside   
17 Jun 2013
Life / Professional feminists' of Poland meet-up [631]

Most just want to not be discriminated against on the grounds of gender, and to have the same chances as men.

What that mean? In details.
Cause it doesn't make sense to me.

raising awareness for issues concerning women

what issues are women issues only?
Ironside   
16 Jun 2013
Life / Professional feminists' of Poland meet-up [631]

The OP thinks the Women's Congress is to representative of all Polish women.

The OP think it isn't not representative and so do I. That event is already highly politicized and ideologically biased. It is not as it claims the Women Congress but Ideological Congress of Some Women. In that light your advice seems somewhat amiss.

When you speak about marginalizing women issues you are showing yourself to be talking rubbish. What is that animal women issues?
Such Congress will not solve any woman issues, they will talk about few lesbian and few outlandish Seuss which do not affect majority of women at all.
Ironside   
15 Jun 2013
Life / Professional feminists' of Poland meet-up [631]

Yeah the point is that you can't have it both ways can you name a more dangerous job than prostitute?

The point is that is not really an honest job. That is either calling or a perfect example of falsehood of a modern secular society.

Otherwise, they should not call it the Polish Women's Congress but Polish Feminist Forum or something along those lines.

Bolsheviks have been always know for making outlandish, untrue claims just to gain upper hand in a propaganda war. They are following well traveled track of their fathers.

Why does this bother you so much?

Probably because it is all BS and propaganda set to fool people and one which doesn't have women interest at heart.
Ironside   
31 May 2013
Life / What do Poles really think about cats? [470]

well some people are nasty to animals and their nastiness is easier displayed towards cats than dogs but one cannot say that cats are in anyway discriminated against on a larger scale.
Ironside   
28 May 2013
Genealogy / All Future Polish Genealogy Researchers: Please Read before you start a thread [45]

I would like to add that probably it is not fair to count Russia an Prussia as European countries. They both were oddities in Europe.

As for Austria that Germanic mountain kinglet can be regarded as a vulture among countries. Set on its Alpine perch and watching for the right time to snatch a carcass from stronger predators.
Ironside   
28 May 2013
Genealogy / All Future Polish Genealogy Researchers: Please Read before you start a thread [45]

Ancient history do not apply here. We are talking about established major Christan country in Europe. I think that after middle ages the partition of Poland has been an event without precedence. I don't even think that countries concerned planned that this way but once they started there were certain dynamics involved that made that happened. \It was beginning of imperial era and of building and maintaining colonies, of the world without Christan values prevailing and without Papacy as a moral and political arbiter.

In short a new bold world without self restraint and without morality to guide its policies.
Slavery become attractive again and tyranny became an attractive option.
The world heralding progress regressed to a deep well of immorality dressed as the rule of reason. Fact the world progressed materially but became a moral pigsty to even the ground for Soviets and Nazi's.
Ironside   
28 May 2013
Language / Slavic languages words similarities with Polish [240]

It's imortant to know for a people where their roots stem from.And not to be ignorant.

Roots and a language could be two different things. Also even if tribes 2000 years were close knitted they went their own ways and developed for the most part their own distinctive culture.

Those who failed to do so and have developed partial not complete culture are seeking for some mythical roots in their language.
Ironside   
28 May 2013
Language / Slavic languages words similarities with Polish [240]

ould we tell on basis of this words comparison that Slovak is definitely closer to Polish than Russian?

What a difference does it make in the general order of things?
Ironside   
25 May 2013
History / How different would WW2 turned out if Poland accepted Hitler's offer [219]

What sounds better is a question of taste and your taste is very original, to say the least.

Well, in my opinion "Arrow" is more suitable as a pseudonym of a commanding general. Also I wouldn't use "Grot" in this contexts because that word in the English langude means number of things and all of them unpleasant or gross.
Ironside   
24 May 2013
History / How different would WW2 turned out if Poland accepted Hitler's offer [219]

OK - arrow-head is better?

It is better but it doesn't sound that good in English as an "Arrow" as a pseudonym. "Arrow-head" bring to mind "Butt-head" and being shafted.

"Arrow" sounds much better and is also meronym of the world "arrow-head".
Is that good enough for you Dear Madam?
Ironside   
24 May 2013
History / How different would WW2 turned out if Poland accepted Hitler's offer [219]

Towards the end of the war they were looking for anybody to fight the Soviets (1943-1944). Fact is that the Nazis have been trying to approach Polish Underground and convince them to fight against Soviets. Details are little hazy but that proposition has been rejected, yet until the Warsaw Rising Germans kept that option open.

They captured general "Arrow" Rowecki the first commander of the Home Army and over a year were holding him and were trying to convince him to German option. when the rising started he was executed.
Ironside   
23 May 2013
UK, Ireland / London is Poland's 24th largest city [85]

However you want to phrase it, I'm sure you know the point I was trying to make.

Sure I do the old "bloody foreigners" complex. I just wonder what is has to do with reality? I mean people of London are for the most part immigrants or born to immigrant parents, grandparents and so on. Then there are people who migrated to London from other parts of the country. So ingenious residents of London are in minority if they exist at all as London has been for centuries melting pot for people from all walks of life and gene-pool.

Also you are laboring here under misconception that the UK government and the UK elite somehow give a flying copulation what commoners and plebeians think. Sure they are fast enough when there is a need to apse them and to keep them in line and contend to some extend but in reality they don't really care. I mean who has been affected by the influx of foreigners and who gained ? You can answer that one yourself I'm sure.

Also, do you think that an average Pole (and one able to read English) would think twice about what some Anglik in some borough think about him/her commencing to work in the UK?For him/her the clear indication would be availability of work, whether or not that work is legal and that about it.

The only way to stop further influx of people form the EU would be voting the UKIP into power. Which I think unlikely.
There is out there are people like you harping on about foreigners and immigrants and this or that. In fact they are powerless and impotent and they know that.

Instead they chose to vent their frustration on this or other internet forum to no avail.
I mean if you want implement some changes you need to change your country policy. I would think that one would be obvious cause ******* on immigrants do not help and there are always a chance they will **** back.

By the way feel free to come back here any time to say the same but I would like to listen to something new for a change. :)
Ironside   
18 May 2013
History / How different would WW2 turned out if Poland accepted Hitler's offer [219]

Hitler was an Austrian that joined the German army, rather than the Austrian army, in WW1 because he didn't want to serve in an army containing such a high percentage of Slavs.

Rather because he admired Prussic Empire.

Indeed, threads like this one, that proport to give "answers" to questions involving massive counter-factuals, may be interesting to read but these answers have absolutely no historical value. History is about what actually happened and no one can claim to know the truth about how WW2 would've turned out if the titular counter-factual had actually happened.

That is obviously what if qestion and none is pretending otherwise.
Although that could be interesting as a means to find out rationale behind Poland decision to refute German offer of alliance. So far it seems like a mistake.

It is even more pressing that you know as Poland at the moment is in fact German close "partner" not to say "younger partner". Question:

Was all those sacrifices and looses including lost of half of Polish territory and then 46 years of Soviet occupation were all for nought as Poland is back in the square one and in close relationship with Germany.

True but we can only wonder how it would look like if he won the war.

well would he won or would he just destroyed Soviets? that is the qestion for which there is no answer.
Only suggestion that given more time the western powers and the USA would have to really put their back into it and win the war in fact.
Ironside   
18 May 2013
History / How different would WW2 turned out if Poland accepted Hitler's offer [219]

Don't give me this quote crap... read between the lines, Hitler insinuates that the Germanic people are Aryan and not the "lower peoples" ...

Well you can read between the lines or even between pages if you want but the fact remain that there isn't any such quote in Hitler's book. You have been caught.

The fact is that Hitler classified people as lower or not according to his whims with an exception of Jews and Bolsheviks.

Why would Poland accept Hitler's agreement, when there is so much hostility towards East Prussia?

What are you talking about?

ust because there is no exact sentence to reference that, does not mean that the entirety of the book could not insinuate that.

Hitler wanted Poland in his camp. He wanted to use them to fight Soviets whom he seen as communist in his mind it equalled the world Jewry.

His beef with Poland and Poles came to be about the fact that Poland resisted him and fought hard against him. For Hitler they action were irrational as he offered Poland alliance.

I read it and although he didn't say sub human he detested Slavs

Yet he worked with Slovakia and Croatia all right. Even Czechs were not that badly treated as Poles. In fact they were doing all right in comparison.
Ironside   
16 May 2013
History / How different would WW2 turned out if Poland accepted Hitler's offer [219]

And one clearly aimed at Delph and I.

If you say so. I don't see the connection but you know better I'm sure.

I see you're lying yet again: he was talking about the descendants of peasants?

nah he is harping about peasants this or that as if there was something wrong with being a one or having such ancestry, what wrong with peasants? Nothing, only bigot could even imply that.

Either way, just go to eastern Poland and you'll see more peasants than farmers. Peasants in Poland even have their own political party; the pre-war leader of that party had fairly firm views about Poland accepting Hitler's offer, which is one of the reasons the Nazis locked him up.

How are you distinguishing between peasants and farmers?Do you measure their sculls? Ask them? What?
PSL? It suppose to be party for farmers.Where from did you get this peasant thingy, that historical expression.
Ironside   
16 May 2013
History / How different would WW2 turned out if Poland accepted Hitler's offer [219]

Good to see that you still have no idea who Delph and I are

Never said a word about you or delph. That was just exercise in hyperbole.
I know what you are Harry.

Anybody who claims that there were Nazi-Polish invasions is clearly a liar: there was only one occasions that the Poles and the Nazis invaded the same country at the same time.

So what you are fretting about?

are unpleasant racist bigots;

like delph harping about peasants? very pleasant, not bigoted and not racist at all, especially if some Aberdeen gangsta keep saying that. In Poland there are no peasant anymore, there are farmers.
Ironside   
16 May 2013
History / How different would WW2 turned out if Poland accepted Hitler's offer [219]

we can't have facts getting in the way of an opportunity to jump on Polish shadows - indoctrination by Western propaganda,

What one can expect form a colonial of German extraction who is ashamed of his former country and some gutter swept from the outer fringes of the globe. Hypothetically speaking - off course.

Yes, they were the same Ukrainians, those loyal to the government headed by Symon Petlyura.

No, Poland have been fighting with one bunch of Ukrainians who had no communication with the other bunch headed by Petlura. so not quite the same Ukrainians. One were subjects of Hapsburg and other has been Tzar subjects.

Local councils which were absorbed by the relevant national governments with the national governments taking on the rights and responsibilities of the bodies which they had absorbed. If Poland had objected to the requirements of the interim agreement, Poland should have stated that at the time, rather than just ignoring the bits it didn't like.

Skip the nonsense. the fact is that said territory enjoyed Polish majority, the fact is that Czechoslovakia government agreed to divide that territory according to the ethnic borders, the fact is that they lied and chested and in effect used force to gain their objective.

Now, you are anti-Polish taken stance that somehow Poles were to blame.

has done quite a bit of work to help Poland and pays taxes here while you do none of those things?

delusion of grander kaffir?
Your financial arrangements and the place you sleep and shyte has nothing to do with the fact that you are taking anti-Polish stance on PF.
Ironside   
15 May 2013
History / How different would WW2 turned out if Poland accepted Hitler's offer [219]

First of all Polish central government constituted on and after 11th of November, so you are talking about action taken by some local organizations.
Polish and Czechoslovakian governments agreed on border based on ethnic boundaries.
Czechoslovakia claims were just a flimsy excuse for an armed aggression.

As usual, I will now challenge you to produce a quote in which I tell a lie and to explain what makes it a lie (as I have done with your lie about Poland taking Polish land in 1938). As usual you will either claim 'it is obvious' or 'I don't have time' or just throw out more insults.

you are a troll, i own you nothing. Given the fact that you are always taking anti-Polish makes it a pleasure.

9 was against the same Ukrainians with whom Poland later signed an alliance and then stabbed in the back by selling them and their country to the Soviets.

you seems not to be grasping a fact that they wasn't the same Ukrainians. (what is wrong with you?)What country? what backstabbing? what it has to do with the issue debated

No debate there. However, the Polish broke the treaty first and then rejected Czechoslovak requests that they stop breaking it. Simple as that.

no that was Polish ethnic territory and Czechoslovakia government under flimsy excuse used their armed forces to get it - simple like that.