The point is that there is no need to produce artist's impressions: there are real images that show this already!
Let me quote myself:
It is hard to imagine the whole picture when you are watching just a few of pictures..
No. It uses 3D rendering. It is not in 3D. If it was, you'd need special glasses to view it and you clearly don't.
This is 3D - Three-Dimensional Graphics - which is part of computer graphic used to show Three-Dimensional objects on the screen of your PC. You are talking about 3D effect in cinema.
Sorry for links in polish, but the images there are enough to understand that I'm correct... and you too. But this cartoon is in 3D as NFS, Gothic, Counter Strike is.
There's not a vast amount of point trying to discuss the twentieth century history of Warsaw with somebody who doesn't even know what MDM is.
Too stupid sentence to be discussed.
As for cost, which would have cost more: repairing the surviving structures or building PKiN?
You said that you won't discus with person who don't know what MDM is and then you are putting such funny question? Are you really don't know why and on what occasion PKiN was build? If Papa Stalin wanted, PKiN would stand on the place of Royal Castle and can't imagine veto about this.
No, the area of the former ghetto was raised to the ground
You were exact so I will be even more: it wasn't. The level of ground wasn't at "the bottom of the ground floor windows" but about 1m lower. By this logic ghetto wasn't razed to the ground. It silly but it's you who wanted to be exact.
Of course ghetto was razed to the ground using "poetry" meaning.
The rest of Warsaw suffered far more from Verbrennungskommando than from Vernichtungskommando (the latter focused their post-uprising efforts on buildings of historical or cultural significance.
Does it change something?
Not as clearly as real images do.
It will show far more clear. Compare quality of aerial photos which I prepared for PKiN using Google Eart with the movie.