Why are some Polish people dark complected, and others very light

You still don't understand what I wrote to you so you decided to insult me, how unusual.

There you go again, misunderstanding English. As i say, Poland's variations in skin tones are just a minor detail, as they are in general. The only difference is in the perception of those individuals who are so psychologically limited and feeble that they hold racist views.

Yes, that's right, you can call it that way. I already told you (Nobel Prize) and you still talk about the skin color, why are you so slow?

Well, the thread is about skin colour after all. And skin colour makes no difference to anything inside the person.

I have already told you that but you still repeated it 5 times after, why?

Worth repeating a thousand times. Skin tone has nothing to do with anything else except the amount of melatonin in skin, and the perceptions (plus their ramifications) by racists.

Ok, have fun doing so, if you have problems memorizing things it's always some way to get over this problem.

As I mentioned before, do you have any evidence that Polish people's IQ varies according to whether they are lighter or darker skinned?

No, I don't, do you have?

Well, after all, in a manner of speaking, when all's said and done and at the end of the day, you did actually write, earlier today:

I was referring to racial differences not skin color differences, I said that before and I will say it again: reading comprehension is something you have SERIOUS issues with. After all those books read... sigh

Same, same. Any diversity between physical features (and this includes skin tone) whether among people in Poland or the wider population are purely superficial and just infinitesimally small variations in DNA. No more significant than eye colour or shoe size.

I am half Lithuanian and half Belarusian, all my family have blonde hair and blue eyes, but my mother and her father from Belarus both have dark brown eyes and hair. I carry their gene but when my skin tans i barely look like im Lithuanian haha. My sister happens to have brown eyes but blonde hair

Certain Poles are descended from Lipka Tatars, this being the case with myself.

those who mixing with western Europeans are dark complected

And how is that Crow?

Because wonderful beautiful Black Mother African blood runs through your veins! Embrace it!

Very interesting thread, it is still unexplained but Poland being the gate way to East and West and constant wars, take overs, invasions made it a country of constant mixing of genotypes to produce contrasting phenotypes.

Wonderful beautiful Black Mother African blood runs through their veins, that's why Polish people have dark complexion! You may not want to believe and accept this fact because of your racist ideologies and beliefs, but it is true! Accept it!

Who is racist? We all have African ancestors, Polish are fully aware of that, so what are talking about? Dark complexion is not an evidence of African ancestor either. Polish have many ancestors from all over the world.

Ktos, so if they were fully aware of this why is it not mentioned here, they mention others? Yeah," Polish have many ancestors," but Wonderful beautiful Black Mother African blood runs through their veins as well! Don't run from this, embrace it Ktos!

This is because it is pointless to run back tens of millions of years that far, I have been more general, others here so far have better information in regards to that, I once had that info too but I forgot the details now, all I remember is that Polish come from the neo-Danube origin and then we mixed with few other types; I forgot which ones. Others have provided some good information here, more specific.

Oh, comon Ktos, what are you on! I'm not running back back "tens of millions of years," Listen up, black people were in Europe long after the Romans! Man, even the 16th Century playwright - William Shakespeare wrote about the respected black General Othello in one of his plays!

atlantablackstar.com/2013/10/07/when-black-men-ruled-the-world-moors/

"Black soldiers, specifically identified as Moors, were actively recruited by Rome, and served in Britain, France, Switzerland, Austria, Hungary, Poland, and Romania."

Because there is no point, we all know that modern humen came from Africa about 40000 years ago but that has nothing to do with these days skin complexion, even the palest Europeans have African roots just like any other people.

utter rubish.if anything,modern human developed in middle east,not deep in africa.cradle of civilizations.and even all those are just theories.some claim it developed in caucas mountains area.not to mention,Europeans share around 10% of its genes with Neanderthal. cro magnons were never found in africa..and those are first european early modern humans.and they were not of black completion for sure

its certain and safe to say Homo heidelbergensis or some other arhaic one come out of africa but definitely not modern one
all we know for sure,leftists and libtards love to spawn politically correct BS over and over.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cro-Magnon

Middle East was the next step, they moved from the area that is now Kenya. The hard working, intelligent and curious ones moved to explore, lazy and not productive ones stayed.

ethiopia but as i said its just theory and based on very controversial remains of 2 skeletons. omo 1 and omo 2.both subject of manipulations and fiddling.

modern humans didnt envolved in africa 40k years ago since remains of early modern humans were found in asia as well..they were dated 200 k years old.

most likely is that modern human developed in many places from Homo heidelbergensis or even earlier ones,in other words..ape come out of africa and developed into humans not humans come out of africa.

its for simple reason.for spiece to envolved it must be subjected to rapid and extreme weather and habitat condition changes . otherwise it will not envolve. example crocodiles never envolved much since dinosaur times.

The oldest ancient human fossils were found in Africa and were dated around 600.000 old. We can't be sure if the humans that appeared in other continents got there from Africa or not until someone invents the time machine I guess.

nope.its Omo 1 around 200k old:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Omo_remains
"Parts of the fossils are the earliest to have been classified by Leakey as Homo sapiens"
or the one found in asia cave of monkeys,also dated around 200k:
livescience.com/22529-oldest-bones-modern-humans-asia.html
news.discovery.com/human/evolution/120000-yr-old-human-found-in-china-15101.htm
all this "human come out of afria" is bg pile of bs


this is certain..it didnt.

How can you prove that Homo heidelbergensis went extinct and we are not their direct descendants?