lol frank your funny and i do agree the arguement is cyclical as we will never aggree but i had already pointed out WE are going in circles in an earlier post
the matter still remains, that evolution is not cyclical, it is slow and steady and progressive.
politics, is a more skewed beast due to the complexity of its nature...us! :)
but you deny that progress has been made when clearly it has!
the UN was created after the league of nations as it collapsed (the UN being an improvment)
WW1 was the war to end all wars in its day and so was WW2 in its, in fact - i wouldnt be surprised if all wars in certain times were described as such so neiter of us will ;win; that point but it s not about succeding and failing...or is it :)
a famous baker was asked about how he prefected makeing the souflet.
he also said, its too early to tell! :P
youve JUST PROVED ME point! NON CYCLICAL BABY!!
you would seem to hold a negative (i hope im wrong)
cool, so your not negative on the view for the future (it cert seems an odd view)
what is it then|?