News /
Poland's Future Includes Fewer Poles, More Foreigners [324]
Classic post, Foreigner4. You have performed just about THE most thorough, rational, and formal dissection-of-argument I have ever seen on this site!
Kind words Mr. Busey, thank you and I'm glad you appreciated it (at least someone did). If you notice, he hasn't answered the original questions and I feel he really has nothing to contribute until he does so.
That's what I think anyway.
That's a fair observation based on personal experience and I appreciate your diplomacy. I will make this observation: You are not a 3rd world immigrant and I feel you are able to approach being an immigrant with far more leverage than one who has no real alternatives, keep in mind you can work for a fair wage (presumably) than someone from eg Sudan.
What i saw in London was a lot of people living in squalid conditions and reaping absolute minimul pay before having a large share of it shystered out of them by various "organizations" providing "services and facilities."
These people were without leverage or representation because (my observations) business owners or company policy dictated a "you are very replaceable" attitude to them. Yes it was better than what they could reap financially at home but that is precisely the problem. Businesses know this and this gives them leverage.
The side effect of that is that indigenous workers then have to compete with that, (businesses know this too) so they too have become more replaceable. Not everyone in a given society is going to have specialized skills, that's a reality.
Another problem is accountabilty. What percentage of eg.UK is even able to vote federally, regionally or municipally? What percentage can't vote due to language barriers (like it or not many do not learn the language because it's easy not to and still get by) or legal status?
Bureacrates are becoming less accountable to a growing number of people within countries which have higher amounts of 3rd and developing world immigrants- that is not a healthy democratic situation.
you cannot profit from globalisation on the one hand, and close your country doors on the other hand.
false dichotomy.
I feel the exploitation of poorer countries' work force, labour laws and general lack of leverage would do more to alleviate inequalities than massive westward immigration.
I do not marginalize people's concerns over increasing immigration
You obviously did and i'm not sure why you're denying as much when the opposite is plain to see.
Really? Tell that to the Japanese, who are the world's #1 net-exporter. They have the most successful trade-economy in the world, and yet they let in the fewest immigrants of practically ANY nation on earth.
Poland never colonized anyone. We don't owe non-Europeans a cent; not a job, a passport, an apartment, or a wife. Sorry.
Excellent points!
So Gary Busey you are Polish? Do you live in England? And what about you foreigner4?
Ahh nice attempt at a deflection and parry but to no avail:
I venture that neither of us are 3rd world or developing world immigrants i.e. we are anomallies, not the norm. I'd also say that, personally speaking, there are fewer immigrants coming from Canada to Poland than vice versa so I am not in anyway contributing to an imbalanced economy here. See how I answered your question. Yours will go unanswered until you do me the courtesy of answering mine.