News /
Grumpy diplomacy hurts Poland [43]
Question in general:
Anyone have an idea about how to make the allocation more fair....while also ensuring that smaller nations don't go unrepresented?
Maybe there is a better way of bridging the disparity.
If I were from, say Estonia, I would have a concern...because what is the point of being in a union, if you have no voice in the affairs of the union.
Its easy to criticise, but who has a better idea?
Foremost.....what should the criteria be
based upon (land mass, population, output)?
Should the country who contributes the most to the union, have the most votes? Should it fluctuate year to year as each country's statistics change?
It sounds like the "qualified majority" means that you vote on issues when they apply to you. How would this figure into things? It should make it more balanced....but of course there may be situations that arise where the opposite is true?