Real genocide in Srebrenica happened on local Serbs. More then 3000 man, woman and children killed in various bestial ways. Then came Ratko Racow and liberated town of Muslim mujaheedine yoke. Ratko then saved all Muslim woman, elderly and children, around 25.000 of them, then things went wrong with Muslim captives that tried to run (well, I don`t blame them considering most of them was involved on genocide on local Serbs).
What isn`t clear here? Why representative of Poland didn`t demand that genocide on Serbs is mentioned in the resolution? Instead, ignoring suffering of Serbs, he voted for resolution that declared Muslim killed (without trial) captives as the victim of genocide. In situation when there was no genocide ideology among Serbs on Muslims in Bosnia, neither Serbs killed Muslim woman and children.
Are you high?
I would like to see what trial would Poles organize in Poland for eventual mujaheedine captives of Polish army, if without doubt is known that few weeks earlier those Muslim fighters mutilated 3000 Polish man, woman and children?
Tell me, dobri brate. How nice trial would that be? Especially if those mujaheedines don`t wait for trial but tries to run.
That is what happened in Srebrenica. See? You didn`t learn in mass media about mutilation on 3000 Serbian man, woman and children? By international genocide experts it was genocide. Muslims had even anti-Serbian and anti-Christian ideology to do that. By those same experts that what happened to captured Muslim fighters was murder out of revenge or during hunt when they tried to escape. It was crime. A war crime. But it was not genocide.
@Mr Grunwald@
Its not nice to BS when you aren`t familiar with facts but judge to others. Especially if you are Polish and spit on Racowie, only because official Poland say its nice.