It is as reliable source as it gets. One I have heard it from had no reason to lie to me whatsoever. However, since you assume that the autopsy report will be publicly available, you are an even bigger idiot than I thought.
Of course Islam is a threat to Western society because it is a neanderthal mysogynistic faith.
Why do Arab nations not accept "Palestinian" refugees? Is it because they understand that Palestine has never existed as a state? Or is it because they know that they will bring nothing but trouble?
By the way, New York just elected a mayor, supported largely by liberal Jews, who has openly questioned Israel's right to exist!! Go figure, you people.
It takes only one Muslim and one box cutter to slash my throat only because I am an infidel or worse - an atheist!
Or is it because they know that they will bring nothing but trouble?
Arabs know that, once in a while, Pals do stupid things like 10/7. Then the IDF drops the hammer on them, wherever they are. They even did it to Iran so there are no limits.
That's why I don't have any Pals living with me.
Based on that video, America haters can claim that we can't be trusted...Trump said 2 weeks and, being a TACO, changed his mind again and did it in 2 days...Liar...
.....only the few big cities! They act like a beacon to all the foreigners and nutters....contrary to the wider land where the common folks with common sense rules!
(Hence the shock after elections, when the big cities learn again that their power isn't in real numbers)
A phenomen to observe in all western countries....
Islam of course, but Talmudism is the greatest threat to Western society. Only a fool or coward would think otherwise. Who has all the nuclear weapons and strongest military in the world? It's not the Muslims. Every western nation could easily defend its borders and continue colonizing the rest of the evil child sacrificing pagan world, but it stopped because of evil ideological forces. Who implanted those evil ideologies in the Western conscious? See the greatest threat above.
He was a hardcore modernist heretic antipope. He prayed with muslim, jews, and heretics. The man hated Catholicism. He taught that the jews still have a covenant with God!
If the 'validity' of the leader of a religious denomination somehow depends on them irrationally hating the same people that you irrationally hate, looks like you've missed the point of that religion.
@Novichok Yes, because liberalism says that everyone is "equal" and should be treated equally. So they believe we are equal to criminals, pagan death cults, and perverts and that they must be treated with compassion. However this is not even true anymore. Now good behavior is evil and evil behavior is good.
@jon35 7 Traditionalist.. I'm sorry to inform you, but you are incorrect. Please see the website and read the facts about BXVI. It shows all previous Catholic teachings he went against. It list many of his heresies against the Catholic Church. Francis and BXVI had the same masonic religion just like the other VII antipopes and all are most likely in the same hot place now. The Church is in eclipse and it has been for decades. Our Lady of La Salette forewarned of this very tragedy. The Catholic religion is no longer taught anymore except for a scattered remnant of traditional Churches with true valid priest and not doubtful priests and bishops found in the V2 church.
Why not pray with infidels?? Because Catholics are not in communion with them. It's a mortal sin to pray with those outside the Catholic faith.
Pope Pius XI in Mortalium Animos from 1928: "Venerable Brethren, it is clear why this Apostolic See has never allowed its subjects to take part in the assemblies of non-Catholics: for the union of Christians can only be promoted by promoting the return to the one true Church of Christ of those who are separated from it, for in the past they have unhappily left it."
Pope St. Leo the Great, Sermon 129: "Wherefore, since outside the Catholic Church there is nothing perfect, nothing undefiled... we are in no way likened with those who are divided from the unity of the Body of Christ; we are joined in no communion."
Pope Innocent III, Eius exemplo, Dec. 18, 1208: "By the heart we believe and by the mouth we confess the one Church, not of heretics, but the Holy Roman, Catholic, and Apostolic Church outside of which we believe that no one is saved."
Benedict XVI, God and the World, 2000, p. 209: "It is of course possible to read the Old Testament so that it is not directed toward Christ; it does not point quite unequivocally to Christ. And if Jews cannot see the promises as being fulfilled in him, this is not just ill will on their part, but genuinely because of the obscurity of the texts... There are perfectly good reasons, then, for denying that the Old Testament refers to Christ and for saying, No, that is not what he said. And there are also good reasons for referring it to him - that is what the dispute between Jews and Christians is about."[6]
Benedict XVI says that there are perfectly good reasons for not believing that the Old Testament refers to Christ as the prophesied Messiah. He says that the Old Testament doesn't point unequivocally to Our Lord as the Messiah. This is another total denial of the Christian Faith.
What makes this apostasy all the more outrageous is the fact that the New Testament is filled with passages which declare that Our Lord is the fulfillment of Old Testament prophecy. To quote just one passage of many, in John 5 Our Lord specifically tells the Jews that what is written in the Old Testament concerning Him will convict them.
John 5:39, 45-47 - "Search the scriptures, for you think in them to have life everlasting; and the same are they that give testimony of me... the one who will accuse you is Moses, in whom you have placed your hope. For if you had believed Moses, you would have believed me, because he wrote about me."
But, according to Benedict XVI, all of these Biblical declarations that Our Lord is the fulfillment of Old Testament prophecies, including Our Lord's own words, may be false. According to Benedict XVI, the Jewish reading that Our Lord is not the Messiah, not the Son of God, and not foretold in the Old Testament, is possible and valid. This is totally heretical, apostate and antichrist.
Benedict XVI also denies Jesus Christ in his book Milestones:
Benedict XVI, Milestones, 1998, pages 53-54: "I have ever more come to the realization that Judaism... and the Christian faith described in the New Testament are two ways of appropriating Israel's Scriptures, two ways that, in the end, are both determined by the position one assumes with regard to the figure of Jesus of Nazareth. The Scripture we today call Old Testament is in itself open to both ways..."[7]
Benedict XVI again declares that Scripture is open to holding the Jewish view of Jesus, that Jesus is not the Son of God. This is precisely why Benedict XVI repeatedly teaches the heresy that Jews don't need to believe in Christ for salvation.
1 John 2:22 - "... he who denieth that Jesus is the Christ? He is antichrist..."
No, the laity doesmt get to say who is Pope, however traditional Catholic have common Catholic sense to understand that a heretic is no longer Catholic and definitely not Pope since one cannot be head of the body he isn't a part of. All V2 "popes" with the Vatican II false religion are not Catholic. Nor is the hierarchy under them. That is just common Catholic sense if you read what the Catholic Church has taught for thousands of years before their robber council. 60 years of a fake religion by usurpers doesn't change Catholic truth.