A priest is a human born with sinful nature because of the original sin. A priest who rapes kids will face the consequences and you're right they lie they truly believe in God. Not all cops are good cops; maybe half of them are not. There are many pedophile teachers, but parents still send their kids to school.
When priests molest little boys, it's humans that prosecute these scumbags and send them to prison.
So the system works as intended. What has God to do with that? God gave priests and all of us the 10 commandments. Some people choose to follow them, but most don't.
See priests raping kids as proof.
Teachers raping kids are proof of what then - that education is useless? We need to keep the standards the same. If a priest rapes a kid, you assume that the church and God are evil; same should apply to a teacher raping kids. We can go further - if a father is a rapist, his child should go to jail too?
God didn't give a shlt while a kid was subjected to the horror of being raped.
A non-believer sets his own standards about what's right and wrong. That is the only logical conclusion because he doesn't believe in divine laws. If so, a rapist sets his own standards about what's ok to f*k or not. If by his standards it's ok to rape a kid, why judge them? They don't follow the 10 commandments so in their world it's ok to rape. Why would you set the Godly standards to atheists?
Did that 8-year-old boy have a free will to say NO? Why didn't God speak for him and send a lighting to stop it?
A true Christian (not all priests are true Christians) would not rape kids. But an atheist could as I wrote above. Due to the original sin, we live in an evil world. People and nature are corrupted.
You may restart it by providing the definition of "God" and proof that "God" exists.
My proof that God (or "Creator") exists is that humans and all living creatures combined would have been unable to build the Earth and the universe from scratch on their own. Even if we gave them 90000000 trillion years to do that. If you don't think that's proof enough, the conversation is over indeed as we won't be able to agree on this crucial point.