European News and Poland Thread - part 4

And, Renata/Ryszard, charity is irrelevant here. It's hard to know why you mentioned it at all, except to pointlessly argue. Your two posts are in that respect entirely contrarian.

Now toddle off, change your skirt and reapply your makeup.

That's why:



This pile of money was given VOLUNTARILY by the WEALTHY. Duh!

So what. Charity is as irrelevant here as it is tax deductible.

Go away and comb your wig.

The relevant part is that after charitable, tax deductible giving, the giver has less money. Duh!

Changing subjects...From Daily Mail:

Kate Middleton stuns as she makes a return to duties with blonde post-holiday hair as she joins William at the Natural History Museum

Hey, Brits, please tell me about those "duties". Is putting on underwear and shoes one of her royal duties?

Is this comment correct?

"return to duties" ?? so every other month an event with a 5 minute appearance - a smile - a wave - some goofy staged moment where everyone gets a laugh - then it's right back to slacking & sponging ..

BTW, I am still waiting for any royal to say something about Muslim migrants. Or are they afraid of the Thought Police, too?

So what.

It's still irrelevant, and your Wii ble about 'charity' has nothing to do with a less exploitative society.

Now Renata. You do look a little dowdy in that skirt.

You've been rumbled. Ypu'r a closet transvestite, hence your obsession...

• 
  IMG_1497.jpeg
  

Hey, Jon, you are a disappointment...I expected better from you...Am I talking to a 7-year-old?

Stuff like that simply doesn't work...

You've been busted, Renata 😂

About those "royal duties"...

Is there a list?

Who wrote it?

Is there a written contract?

What would happen if any of the royals said, fvck it...I am going to Florida to lay out on the sand?

Are the royals supervised to make sure if they carry out their "royal duties" faithfully and according to the contract?

Anyone here? The suspense ...

Who knows?

They do get to wear some very pretty frocks and nice nylon stockings, just as you do secretly at home.

Canada is not in Europe, but these motherfvckers act like they are so I am posting this here...

"In Quebec," Plott Calabro notes in The Atlantic, "more than 7 percent of all deaths are by euthanasia - the highest rate of any jurisdiction in the world." Cumulatively, more than 60,000 Canadians have been euthanized since the law took effect.

Canadians choose to die not because they are sick...They choose to die because they are sick and tired of living in a leftist hell...

They could have moved to the US...or maybe that's why they submitted to euthanasia. 🤔

UK to move illegals into military barracks after fury over migrant hotels

British stupidy never matched that of Biden's but it sure is up there on the stupid scale. Quoting:

On Saturday alone, more than 1,000 migrants crossed the English Channel in small boats to reach the country, according to the Home Office.

Strangely, these morons still believe that they live in a democracy.

In "communist" Poland nobody claimed it and nobody would believe it. To their credit, our "communists" were honest. Western scum lies all the time. About everything...

Their country is in shambles. Nigel Farage is gaining in the polls. The problem is.... you just cant fix stupid!

• 
  the-high-crime-rate..jpg
  

...and for a very simple reason...when "stupidity" is part of your core values...

How do you stand up and say: We, the British government, lied to you all these years and you, morons, believed us when we were telling you that migrants are good for the country.

Fvcking impossible....That's exactly why Kamala couldn't say what she would do differently about migrant invasion. It would be a "king is naked" moment...

Brits, with their piramid of royal azzholes, House of Lords and other pompous idiots are in a Kamala situation, with nobody like Trump to tell these morons that they have been had.

As you can see, I tried to be extra nice ... I had a very good day. How was yours...

Moderate Islam is the Long Grass: Radical Islam is the Snake!

One-in-12 people living in London is an illegal immigrant, shock data reveals: Almost 600,000 of the capital's residents have NO right to be in the UK, previously secret report says (h)ttps://trib.al/YfHvYxt

How do you, guys, enjoy the silence from PF Brits regarding these "far-right" demonstrations in London?

Yes, I know, the UK is a "democracy" where even the king has to keep his mouth shut if the subject is Muslim invasion.

Asylum is a fraud. Why Brits still fall for this is proof that they are either insane or women.

British elites are globalists and liberal to the core. They are doing very well, and they don't seem to care about the British. I mean, they care as much as is needed to gaslight enough of the population not to be kicked out of the country. Whereas so-called common folk suffer because of illegal immigration or muslim crime, that is not their concern.

They care a lot, but negatively. They care about them the way you care about homeless drunks getting into your klatka, sh)tting, puking and passing out....

The only way to explain this situation is pure incompetence or pure malice (by both leading parties)

x.com/jonatanpallesen/status/1967537142432715057

And of course Starmer's phony one in one out is stillborn as the first flight taking some illegals back to France was challenged on legal grounds and so the current policy is "as many as possible in, and none out" because the UK has infinite space.... apparently.

Would you prefer a world without the rule of law?


Don't be silly.

What laws were the challenge based on?


Wake me up after the first ten flights have landed with deportees in France.

How can this be explaned without incompetence, indifference or malice? (not just one party, it's systemtic across parties)

youtube.com/watch?v=LNPccXBp5I0

That, Maf, is something for lawyers and the courts. It is literally why they exist. Perhaps you prefer a world without the rule of law.


Given that you're making up fantasy government policies, perhaps that wold eb a good idea this morning.

Yes, one in one out was pure fantasy.....

Same in Germany, they can't deport convicted criminals because NGOs file legal challenges.... (and activist judges look for any reason to keep criminals in Europe rather than send them home).

A broken, dysfunctional and unsustainable system... but rule of law! Yeay!

It's a deal signed with the French. I knew from day 1 that there would be problems.

Nevertheless, the current government have deported more than the last one ever did and less than 1% of asylum appeals are upheld.


Fortunately we don't have 'activist judges' (dunno about Germany however although the legal system is often frustrating, we do need the rule of law.

A non-citizen enters a country illegally, the country decides they have no right to stay..... what more 'rule of law' is needed?

Apparently the one (or more) in from France is going ahead with no problems anticipated?

So... net gain (net loss in societal and economic terms, but who cares? rule of law! infinite numbers in! no one out!

The right of appeal. When that is exhausted, bye bye, as ISAs been happening for a year now.


No idea, however the deal is one in, one out.

And don't believe the crap about people not being deported because their kids don't like Iranian food. All that is fake news from racists.

A person arrives at Heathrow or whatever airport..... border control decides they have no right to enter the country. Do they have access to a 'right of appeal'?

Why should arriving on a boat be different?

Of course not.

Though that rarely happens since passengers are pre-screened at their airport of departure.


What would you do when a dinghy hits shore?

Take them into custody (jail, closed centers) and keep them there until their case is resolved. In the long run that would be cheaper. Let them know that their case is closed (against them) at the first infraction.

Give them the burden of proof for why they should be allowed to stay rather than assume the state has the burden of proof as to why they should not.

The only reason no British government can come up with workable plans to stop the flow is that they don't want to stop the flow (no matter what they say).

The purpose of a system is what it does.

The current British system is about abolishing the middle class and turning the country in Brasil (tiny rich elite amid masses of the poor).

That's been discussed endlessly, however it's cheaper and easier to put people in nasty-ass hostels and former hotels.


This is how it works.


That sounds a bit like a rightwing conspiracy theory.


That really is a particularly nutty conspiracy theory, especially as we have a Labour government.

In the short term.... in the long term it's far, far more expensive.


Do you have any counter evidence?


How much counter evidence is there?

We all know that. One reason it's being addressed.


Do you have any evidence for your conspiracy theory? Who is behind it? Who are the conspirators? How many thousands must be taking part? How did they get radically different political parties to get on board? Who are the principal opponents? Where are the documents outlining your plan and its timeline?