Was Charlie Kirk popular in Poland?

Imperfect as JFK was, the peace corps and nuclear test bans weren't the absolute worst things in the world.

However J. Edgar had other ideas which is why he had the president snuffed out!

The murder is solved now, good reading and analysis: rense.com/general98/Most_Photographed/

Are you referring here to JFK or Charlie Kirk?

Just open the link - it is fascinating research about Kirk's assassination (done by his own "bodyguards").

@Ron2
That report is very interesting. Maybe its presentation, maybe its cumulative evidence, but it is very interesting.

They were shooting at another influencer's place of work lately. Seems loony people on the left have finally lost it.

I totally understand it...Out ot arguments? Shoot.

Here, dig into a poster's private life...or call him "a surrender boy" ...That was before 2 million deaths and before the US said the very same thing...

Novi, you are a true genius and Nostradamus' best impersonator...

They have a patsy: cnn.com/2025/12/11/us/tyler-robinson-hearing-charlie-kirk-shooting
Foolish Americans will buy it.

Buy what? Two shooters theory?

Memo to conspiracy lovers: Not every act of stupity has Mossad agents lurking behind it.

How about this:

Oh, look, a guy on the roof over there...with what looks like a rifle...

No...Maybe he is just repairing it ... relax...

How about this one:

Mr. President, riding in a convertible in Dallas may not be safe...

It will be OK...they love me here...

Boom...

If that's the case then what you're saying is that the whole thing was a set-up.

Prosecutors are seeking the death penalty. No-one's stupid enough to take the fall and gamble with their life.

I base my point on the evidence posted here: rense.com/general98/Most_Photographed/, which clearly contradicts the official narrative. Also, Kirk's security guards were from Israel, aka Mossad agents, confirmed by Kirk himself.

The death penalty means the case will likely continue for another five years, by which time the American public may have forgotten what it was all about. The patsy could then be free and living in Israel, and no one would notice.

Please, do yourself a favor and watch this clip. Does he look like a murderer to you?

He looks like a relieved and happy student who passed a difficult exam and awaits his reward. Read the conversation - it's clearly pre-arranged. He's an actor, yet the American public still eats up this garbage.

He says to his attorney, "So he had a wife?" Really? You're referencing his wife after weeks? The conversation is obviously staged for the gullible public, but the acting is really bad.

The last piece of evidence to manipulate the masses: look at the screenshot from the clip above - it is NOT from the video itself!

In the screenshot, the attorney wears a light-blue uniform, but in the actual video, she wears a dark blue (completely different) uniform. They have probably realized taking a screenshot from the actual clip would make some people think, so they tried to correct it there so that the patsy doesn't look so suspiciously happy.

If it was staged for sympathy, it failed terribly.

For that smirky smile, I would execute him three times.

overkill...

To conspiracy nuts:

Were Mossad or the CIA behind every school shootout? Of course, not...Trying to logically explain why some attention-craving pimply azzhole decided to murder kids he never met is supremely pointless. Why do teen girls murder their parents? Mossad?

Let's assume for a moment that Dirk was saying things Israel didn't like. So Mossad gets the task of shutting Dirk up. If that's the objective, one phone call would do it. Why do it so publicly?

Also, there are a billion people out there saying things Israel doesn't like...Now what?

As a sidebar...Hey, Mossad, I always liked you and your extra-judicial methods...like after Munich '72...one at a time...I hope you told them who you were just before they saw Allah...

To deter others? There are no others. If there are, it's a dozen, not 1200, so the same method of silencing them without violence could be used twelve more times. Again... one phone call in the dead of night, and the problem is gone...

There is nothing easier than killing an individual target who leads a normal life. From a dart that kills in seconds to a bullet from a car...There are hundreds of unresolved murders in Chicago alone...

Bottom line: On that day, extreme stupidity met a moron with a gun ...

@Novichok
Research the referenced link - all the answers are there. Read about the gun type involved, examine the pictures, and coordination between the shooter and the other security members. I see the only person who gets it is "PolAmKrakow."

This is probably my last post in this thread - if you don't get it, I did my best.

1. From the official / FBI story and Wikipedia: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assassination_of_Charlie_Kirk, quote:

"Shot in the neck from the roof of a building approximately 142 yards (130 m) away."

2. Now watch the first 12 seconds of this referenced video: rense.com/general98/video-2.mp4

IF the shot was made from 130 meters away, you would NOT hear the gun shot initiated from the nearby crowd. But it clearly was, unless you don't trust your ears.

What's your bottom line?

Throwing noodles at the wall gets old very quickly...

I watched it. Now what?

Nearby crowd ... that did nothing...just let the shooter walk away? With a riffle...Sure...

His own mother wouldn't be able to identify the POS when the crowd was done with him...

Take your daughter to a long shooting range. Have her fire a shot from 142 yards away from you and from 10 yards away from you. Use your brains to compare the experiment to the shooting sound and timing from the video and decide if the 10 yard-distance sound and timing could have matched the 140 yards one. Voila.


You have CLEARLY not read the article that have pictures of the gun. It was not a riffle, but a clever mini hand gun.