The BEST Guide to POLAND
Unanswered  |  Archives [3] 
  
Account: Guest

Home / News  % width   posts: 390

Was Charlie Kirk popular in Poland?


Novichok  8 | 11078
1 day ago   #331
Not in Poland - here we can say what we like about the 13th disciple

...an old Soviet joke...

If the consequence of free speech is that you lose your job, well then that is not really free speech is it?

Free speech is that you don't end up in prison, not in an unemployment office.

A job is a privilege and a contract, not a right.

As always, stupid like a brick...
PolAmKrakow  4 | 1115
1 day ago   #332
@Ironside
As you describe the truth of free speech, most dont understand consequences.

@cms neuf
Fantastic you work for yourself. Now, name your company and address of it and we will secure a boycott for you. Simple example of words spoken getting a reaction possibly not intended by your free speech. There is a cost to free speech, and it should never be someones life.
cms neuf  1 | 2265
1 day ago   #333
A job is a privilege and a contract, not a right.

Maybe if you are Junior Vice President for Street Drainage Maintenance at the Illinois Dept of Works. yes Mr Smith, Thank you Mr Smith

we will secure a boycott for you.

Right, because in my incredibly obscure branch of work the few customers have enough choice that they can take offense on behalf of a little known podcaster from a different country
Novichok  8 | 11078
1 day ago   #334
Maybe if you are Junior Vice President for Street Drainage Maintenance at the Illinois Dept of Works. yes Mr Smith, Thank you Mr Smith

Sober up.
mafketis  43 | 11827
1 day ago   #335
If the consequence of free speech is that you lose your job,

If you work in medicine and publicly announce your intention to not treat (or to harm) potential patients based on their politics... then you should be fired.
cms neuf  1 | 2265
1 day ago   #336
If you work in medicine and publicly announce your intention to not treat (or to harm) potential patients based on their politics... then you should be fired.

Absolutely no idea what you are on about.

This is Poland, as well as having free speech we also have socialized medicine. Turn up injured at the hospital and you will be treated like everybody else, doesn't matter if you are a Nazi or a Hari Krishna.
Lazarus  4 | 682
1 day ago   #337
Now, name your company and address of it and we will secure a boycott for you.

Care to post your name? You seem very interested in suppressing any free speech about your past on any of the platforms where you fish for new clients, even when every statement made is 100% true and verifiable.
Novichok  8 | 11078
1 day ago   #338
Turn up injured at the hospital and you will be treated like everybody else

In 2019, I did just that and was told I had to pay up front, in zloty, no credit cards or travel insurance. I had two, with 800 numbers. Still a no...

Fvck Poland. I was on the way home to Chicago the next day ...after a three-day stay and a $500 fee for rescheduling my departure...

Never again...
Feniks  1 | 1058
1 day ago   #339
an example (in the form of a quote, in context) of anything he said that was unreasonable....

I found this to be unreasonable and I would argue that it is divisive but I guess that depends on your view of abortion.

x.com/snopes/status/1968465095828160630

The people who rejoice or celebrate the death of a father and husband have no place in society.

You keep banging on about this but not a single person on this forum has rejoiced or celebrated his death. You, however, have no problem in wishing ill will towards PF members:

@cms neuf
I personally wish you a slow and painful death from the worst of cancers

I think you need anger management classes to be honest.
OP Lyzko  46 | 10210
1 day ago   #340
@jon,
As Bertolt Brecht, best known virulently anti-Nazi playwright,
said (roughly translated):

A country in need of heroes
Is indeed a country in need
mafketis  43 | 11827
22 hrs ago   #341
I found this to be unreasonable and I would argue that it is divisive

We've had posters here say basically the same thing....

It's a position that I wildly disagree with but it's in line with a lot of paleo-conservatives.

Try again.
Paulina  19 | 4810
22 hrs ago   #342
but it's in line with a lot of paleo-conservatives.

And that makes it "reasonable" how?? Try again. 🤨

That statement alone would make me wish him to drop dead. No, I wouldn't kill him and wouldn't call for killing him, but forgive me if I'm not shedding any tears. 🥲 The less messed up people like him on this planet the better - that's my honest opinion and I won't change it.

The people who rejoice or celebrate the death of a father

First and foremost that creep didn't deserve to be a father. 🤮

but I guess that depends on your view of abortion.

No, that depends on whether you're a normal human being with empathy or not.
jon357  76 | 25273
21 hrs ago   #343
A country in need of heroes
Is indeed a country in need

And of course, over there, they're following Brecht's other recommendation. Since the people don't like their govrnment, their government is changing the people.

So much drama over the passing of someone who after all was only a youth youtuber.
mafketis  43 | 11827
21 hrs ago   #344
And that makes it "reasonable" how??

Context.... helpfully left out by Feniks

"If cesarean section is not going to save the mother's life, and the mother's life is actually at risk, which is debated amongst growing numbers of OB-GYNs, that is the only case where abortion should be allowed. But, it is a growing consensus in the pro-life world that abortion is never medically necessary."

So the assumption is that the baby could be delivered without harming the mother.

Again, a common view among anti-abortion rights people.
Paulina  19 | 4810
21 hrs ago   #345
@mafketis, what "context" did Feniks leave out? What you quoted was said by Kirk or what?

which is debated amongst growing numbers of OB-GYNs

Are we still talking here about a 10-year-old???

So the assumption is that the baby could be delivered without harming the mother.

First and foremost a 10-year-old child shouldn't be forced to be a "mother" and be subjected to pregnancy and delivering a child (cesarean section is a serious surgery) and ANY risk connected to pregnancy and giving birth, especially that there is no other way for a 10-year-old to get pregnant than due to rape.

🤮

a common view among anti-abortion rights people.

Then a lot of "anti-abortion rights people" are sick f*cks. What's your point again?
Paulina  19 | 4810
21 hrs ago   #346
it is a growing consensus in the pro-life world that abortion is never medically necessary."

The pro-life world is dangerously retarded then. It's scary that people who are this stupid (or ignorant?) are allowed to vote. 😳
mafketis  43 | 11827
20 hrs ago   #347
what "context" did Feniks leave out? What you quoted was said by Kirk or what?

Yes, I stupidly forgot to put in the quotation marks... oh no! Actually I did include the quotation marks which you ignored.

whole thing is here:

snopes.com/fact-check/charlie-kirk-10-year-old-rape/

a hypothetical in which the pregnancy could be delivered with no harm to the mother.

It's a position I disagree with but 'divisive' only to those unable to tolerate different points of view.

I won't answer anything until you've had a chance to see the broader context.
Paulina  19 | 4810
20 hrs ago   #348
Actually I did include the quotation marks which you ignored.

I didn't ignore the quotation marks, I asked you if that quote was by Kirk.

It's a position I disagree with but 'divisive' only to those unable to tolerate different points of view.

Nazis had "different" views too. I'm afraid I'm not able to "tolerate" or stomach their views either. They can kindly go f*ck themselves.

I won't answer anything until you've had a chance to see the broader context.

I've read the whole thing from your link and I don't understand why you think the context helps Kirk in any way. I stand by my previous opinion that empathy-deprived sociopaths like this who don't love their kids don't deserve to have daughters (and I'd rather they didn't procreate at all). My guess is also that his daughter will be better off without him in the long run.
mafketis  43 | 11827
20 hrs ago   #349
I asked you if that quote was by Kirk.

Cause you're too lazy to do the work...

Nazis had "different" views too.

First person to bring up nazis in an argument loses. So.... you lose.

his daughter will be better off without him in the long run

That's cold... you might wanna walk that one back.... would you tell her that to her face? If not, then don't write it here.
Lenka  6 | 3581
20 hrs ago   #350
hypothetical in which the pregnancy could be delivered with no harm to the mother.

Sorry but I don't believe there is a chance of a pregnancy in 10yo not carrying a risk.

That view is scary. I think a lot of men how big a thing pregnancy and birth is. No 10yo should be forced to do it.

I didn't hear about the man before he was killed . I didn't do any research on him after either so I can't discuss his general views but the 10 yo situation puts me firmly on the opposite side.

While I would not wish what happened on him my companion did go down after I saw interview with him where he said he accepts certain deaths as a price for gun possession.
Paulina  19 | 4810
20 hrs ago   #351
Cause you're too lazy to do the work...

Why are you attacking me, maf? Because I don't like what Kirk said? I did google the whole fragment, but it didn't come up in my google search. I always google first.

First person to bring up nazis in an argument loses. So.... you lose.

Don't be childish. The fact that views are "different" doesn't mean they aren't evil, inhumane or sick and that they should be tolerated. There are people holding views that it should be legal for adults to f*ck 5-year-olds. There are men supporting marrying 9-year-olds, because a "holy book" says it's OK.

would you tell her that to her face?

No, of course I wouldn't tell a kid who just lost her father that she will be better off without her father. That's because I have... you know... empathy. I am saying it to you on an internet forum - that this is my guess.

That's cold...

No, that's pretty realistic, unfortunately, and coming from my personal experience.
mafketis  43 | 11827
20 hrs ago   #352
there is a chance of a pregnancy in 10yo not carrying a risk.

there's not much chance of a 10 year old getting pregnant either unless it's a case of precocious puberty.... pregnancy is impossible before a girl starts ovulating.

that's why the whole thing was hypothetical and not a real case (and he did allow for pregnancy in cases when safe delivery is impossible).

So the quote was massaged out of context.... that's what's divisive.
Paulina  19 | 4810
20 hrs ago   #353
snopes.com/fact-check/charlie-kirk-10-year-old-rape/

And from this link - this is what Kirk said:

"What makes the West great is that we do good after evil, not evil after evil."

This is coming from a man who thought that executions should be public, televised and that kids should watch it as a form of "initiation."

So the quote was massaged out of context....

No, it wasn't. Kirk was asked about a scenario if this happened to his own daughter and he answered directly to that question.

there's not much chance of a 10 year old getting pregnant

But it does happen. And Kirk would force this upon her own daughter. That's enough for me to know anything I need to know about him as a human being.
Lenka  6 | 3581
20 hrs ago   #354
10 yo is not a precocious.
PolAmKrakow  4 | 1115
17 hrs ago   #355
@Paulina
And let us hope you are not a mother.

A child has its very own DNA, and while in the mothers body, it is its own being. At 10 weeks it is no longer an embryo. After that its murder. But of course, pro choice people never mention that these babies, as independent beings, have rights as well.

Charlie Kirk said the difference between the left and right is the difference between evil and good. Its only the left that condones violence and destruction of cities when they dont get their way. The left is simply the retardation of society. The left want mass migration, and who are they letting in? Murderers and rapists. Because they dont care about other people children when they are too busy killing their own as a form of birth control.
Lenka  6 | 3581
17 hrs ago   #356
A child has its very own DNA

Guess what- that 10yo has her own DNA too.

Its only the left that condones violence and destruction of cities when they dont get their way.

I guess it wasn't Trump supporters in the Capitol after he lost elections?
Lazarus  4 | 682
17 hrs ago   #357
You keep banging on about this but not a single person on this forum has rejoiced or celebrated his death.

That's because those of us who don't support Trump are good people. I mean, Horst Wessel was a fairly unpleasant creature but I wouldn't have rejoiced or celebrated his death.

That's cold... you might wanna walk that one back.... would you tell her that to her face? If not, then don't write it here.

I would, but she's two years old and doesn't even understand who her daddy is. Look at it this way: now she has a chance to grow up saying "daddy" to somebody who isn't a complete douchebag but she still gets the benefit of the money the douchebag made from humilitating teenagers.
Paulina  19 | 4810
17 hrs ago   #358
And let us hope you are not a mother.

And I feel for your daughter if you have one.

I care more about children who are already alive and sentient.

A child has its very own DNA, and while in the mothers body, it is its own being.

I don't care, because it's a rapist's DNA in the body of my 10-year-old daughter, you sick f*ck. My own 10-year-old daughter would be more important to me than a cluster of cells made by a rapist. Any normal parent would feel the same way the way I do - and the polls in my country reflect that.

Charlie Kirk said the difference between the left and right is the difference between evil and good.

I'm not "left" and we're not talking about destroying cities or mass immigration (which I don't support anyway), but about forcing your 10-year-old child to carry on with pregnancy and deliver a baby.
PolAmKrakow  4 | 1115
16 hrs ago   #359
@Paulina
Three daughters, all of them beautiful, happy and healthy. All of who want to spend time with me. Your 10 yr old daughter, and I hope its not actually true, is a different case all together. Abortion from rape or incest is completely different in my opinion. Now if your daughter is 18, and using it as a form of birth control, then she should have learned how to swallow, or simply not be having sex. And if you made up the ten year old daughter to make an example, you're the sick fvck.

You are a true lefty. The left destroy what the right builds. Cities, families, communities, churches, and traditions. The left would burn it all down.
Paulina  19 | 4810
16 hrs ago   #360
And if you made up the ten year old daughter to make an example, you're the sick fvck.

My God, are you dumb or something?
It's a hypothetical scenario that we're discussing because of what Charlie Kirk said. Are you paying any attention at all to what we've been writing here??

Abortion from rape or incest is completely different in my opinion.

Meaning? What are your views exactly?

You are a true lefty.

No, I am not. Not that I think there's anything wrong in having left-wing views, it's just those are not mine. And, btw, my impression is that in some aspects left-wingers are often actually more Christian than right-wingers.


Home / News / Was Charlie Kirk popular in Poland?

Please login to post here!