Will PiS be happy if AfD wins elections in Germany?

I would agree with your father...but the US profited and still profits from all the ambitious and brave spirits, not only Jews.

The european mass exodus of brain over the centuries to the US is barely ever spoken of....

This is what has pissed off people about Jews since before Julius Caesar.

A fundamental uncharitability towards those not like them. A lack of interest or curiosity, in the people on whose good will they depend on.

Russians and Poles are absolute retards in this sense. Slavs generally. We'll help the oppressive foreign "pan", before helping ourselves.

..with the number one retard being that Polish king who invited 70% of them...What a moron...How about interviewing the tribes where they lived already...

It's symptomatic that it was Ivanka who switched, not her Jewish husband. When a goy visits a temple, he wears a yarmulka. When a Jew stops at the church...

Oops, they never do...If they do, they never hang a rosary on their necks...

This is already a thing of the past.

...but stil a teaching moment applicable to all Western woke idiots right now...


No shlt...I didn't know that...

... and what they did in the Commonwealth and within the Tsardom - is exactly what they are good at now.

1) Running establishments that serve alcohol

2) Having a son or daughter, that lives above the pub, and that plays the piano or violin for patrons.

3) A brother that lends to stupids goys, behind on their bar tab.

4) An uncle that collects taxes from stupid Polish and Russian serfs, and then delivers that to his Sarmatian Pan.

5) A relative in Frankfurt or London, that writes about what articles of clothing or home goods are popular now in the West, and an offer to deliver these items for sale.

Here you see:

1) Entertainment
2) Music
3) Finance
4) International trade

I didn't come up with all this. It comes from Solzhenitsyn's book - "Two Hundred Years Together". It tells the story of how Russians shaped Jews, and how Jews shaped Russians.

...and how Jews took over KGB and UB...

It seems that every revolution had Jews at the top...

Hey, Lyzko, where the hell are you...

Kamienice są znowu nasze...

Say hello to Hitler...You don't have to hug the man ...Hello will be fine...

Except for the French, American, Irish and Italian National Revolution, Rich!

Neither Patrick Henry, Philip Nolan, Geo. Washington, Robespierre, Count Cavore, Mazzini, Garibaldi, Parnell or Eamon de Valera were Jews in
any way, shape or form.

You're merely fueling your ignorance further.

Quoting:

England expelled Jews in 1290 primarily due to a combination of economic hardship for the crown and growing anti-Semitic sentiments, leading to the Edict of Expulsion. King Edward I, facing financial difficulties and needing to secure further taxation from Parliament, essentially "bargained" with them, using the expulsion of the Jewish population as a means to gain support for his war efforts.

That was 7 centuries ago! No Hitler. Those English Nazis...Shame...

In 1290, Edward I issued the Edict of Expulsion, mandating that all Jews leave England by October 1, 1290, or face the death penalty.

Bravo! That's what I call a sure-fire swift deportations.

The king, heavily indebted and reliant on Jewish moneylenders, struggled to repay them and was facing pressure from both the Jewish community and Parliament.

I am shocked...Jews lending money instead of going to work and making the country richer...

Money works for them.
But seriously, are there no bakers, bricklayers, plumbers, bus drivers or other working people in Israel?

for decades Israel relied on cheap arab labor for lots of physical stuff....(which attracted more arabs to the region who quickly became 'palestinians' who hated Israel).

they also import a lot of cheap Asian labor (ever wonder why there were Thai and Filipino hostages taken on Oct 7?)

....had they been jewish maybe?

There's the elephant in the room.

Gaza is slap bang next to the northern Egyptian conurbation, one of the largest and poorest in the world with a huge birth rate and little in the way of an economy.


Lots. It's not all cosmopolitan ex-Varsovians or people with one foot in Tel Aviv and another in Brooklyn or Glasgow. Millions of people there came from other parts of the MENA region after 1948 to escape pogroms. Most are generationally poor.

People forget that before WWII most Arab countries had Jewish minorities that did face discrimination but which mostly did okay. Then almost all of them decided to exile them and most went straight to Israel which made Israel much stronger than it had been...

As a rule, Arabs do not excel at long term planning....

Or taking responsibility for things. A fatalist society. That's how things have turned out though, nurture not nature, and we shouldn't beat in them too much for it.

you can't really have one without the other....

@mafketis
Remember people born and bred in, say, the U.K. or the U.S. and have a Polish granny aren't Poles and don't behave, act or think like Poles.

It's the same with any culture, Take a kid out of their environment and they'll be a very different adult to what they'd have been if they'd not left.

I disagree, Jon....

We have meanwhile alot of experiences with immigration and integration of different cultures (or their lack of).

Ethnical ghettoes are a fact in every big city (voluntarily that is)....people fall back especially hard onto their heritage in a foreign environment...becoming even hardcore nationalist far way from their nation, where they didn't care at all.

Most people do just NOT change their heritage like a pass! Even home-conflicts with other ethnics are alive and well in a for both foreign environment. To believe otherwise is the big multikulti illusion....

The big red mark IMHO is the number! To have only a few ethnic minorities is the best for all....once above a certain percentage this minority would want (and need) less and less to integrate, rather changing their environment to fit them "better"....and thats just bad for all!

A loaded word and best avoided, however it proves my point. Living within in a closely knit community, they still get the nurture.


Who said they did? And why would someone do that?


Do you mean "other people"?

Whats with "ethnics"? Is it wrong grammar or such?

Yes. The word is a neologism that's only used as a slur and as othering.

It's the constant othering by some voices in society that reinforce divisions that need not exist.

Hmm....I didn't use it as a slur...but its a fact!

There ARE different ethnies with different cultures and heritages, they exist!

There are so many different ethnicities; all of us have one, some have 100% one and 100% another, however saying or writing "ethnics" in English is to use a term which exists to offend.

Wow! For me its just a description....

In English?

Mentioning people as being from ethnic minority backgrounds or living in such a community is fine. The neologism "ethnics" as a noun to describe people was created as a slur and is only used as such.

Israelis are not a rich people, by and large. They have the second highest poverty rate in the OECD, behind only Costa Rica.

The main pockets of poverty are Arab and Orthodox communities, with the Orthodox actually doing worse.
The Orthodox in general, represent a ticking time bomb under Israel.

In 1948, Ultra Orthodox Jews (funny guys with hats) made up less than 1% of Israel's population. By the 1970s they were around 4%. Today they are at 20%+, and by the middle of the century their numbers are projected to rise to 40% of the population.

The average Ultra Orthodox woman has 6-7 children. At the same time, the average Ultra Orthodox man does not work. In fact, the Bank of Israel states that over 60% of Ultra Orthodox men "do not work".

What do they do instead of working? They read books all day. Who pays for this? The State of Israel, their hard working wives (who because they are uneducated usually work only the lowest level jobs), and bleeding heart American Jews.

On top of refusing to work, and sitting pretty on welfare - these guys refuse to serve in the military. There are efforts now to force them, but they're quite good at staging mass protests where they throw pieces of pavement at Israeli cops.

So... just technically speaking there are a million people in Israel capable of driving a truck or baking some bread - and which really need the money too. The problem is that they like to pretend they are still living in a 19th century Belarusian village, and feel other people should be grateful to be able to support their Talmudic studies.

If you have a country of 350 million people... then the welfare system can be robust enough to support a few million lazy weirdos. If you have only 9 million people like Israel, that's not a very workable proposition.

"ethnic" by itself is not polite

"ethnic" as an adjective is fine.

"ethnic German" or "ethnic Italian" or "ethnic neighborhood" or "ethnic restaurant" or "ethnic tensions".... all good

As a noun, it's basically taproom talk, not for here

Even "ethnic neighbourhood" or "ethnic restaurant" is iffy since all neighbourhoods and all restaurants are ethnic (or multiethnic".