The BEST Guide to POLAND
Unanswered  |  Archives [3] 
  
Account: Guest

Posts by AntV  

Joined: 25 Feb 2011 / Male ♂
Warnings: 1 - O
Last Post: 25 Jun 2025
Threads: Total: 3 / Live: 2 / Archived: 1
Posts: Total: 727 / Live: 710 / Archived: 17
From: USA

Displayed posts: 712 / page 22 of 24
sort: Latest first   Oldest first   |
AntV   
29 Sep 2020
News / Poland rejects international criticism over LGBT rights [28]

Trump doesn't appear to want to fight against the LGBT agenda-I think he's a libertarian when it comes to sexual relations. The US needs to stop promoting it, though. It's one of my few complaints about the Trump admin.
AntV   
6 Sep 2020
News / What should Poland do with the problem of Belarus? [1800]

Why do you put all protesters in Solidarity basket?

Because i haven't, but without the unity under Solidarity it was highly unlikely the government would have made the concessions it made.

In 80 or 81 the gov was trying to put a wedge between the different industry workers and negotiate relatively meaningless wage increases, e.g. separately negotiating with the strikers in the shipyard and truck factory, etc., correct? It wasn't until all (or, at least, most) of the strikers at different industries demanded the 21 demands as a unified voice did you see the gov willingly, although not in total good faith, start to consider more meaningful demands, correct?

If there wasn't the solidarity under Solidarity, the opposition to the gov would've been markedly weaker and impotent.

Again, I don't refute there was violence on the part of protesters, but it wasn't widespread and sustained and not significant enough to bring the commies to the table. If there's proof that the Solidarity leadership called for or condoned it, I'm unaware of it.
AntV   
6 Sep 2020
News / What should Poland do with the problem of Belarus? [1800]

talking with the opposition or deal with people`s annoynance in streets again.

But annoyance doesn't mean violence. It overwhelmingly meant strikes and protests, yes? I'm not trying to refute there wasn't any violence, but it was typically, if not always, started by the authorities (what were the security police called back then?), which matters because it shows that demonstrations were peaceful --demonstrators only reacted violently when provoked. And, that's been my point all along, the Solidarity movement was a peaceful movement and its demands were met because of non-violent pressures, not violent ones.

How did they care about people`s opinions then?

Apparently they did, as they kept propagandizing that evil foreign forces were trying to expand their activities against the state and stuff like that.

future of a communist country depends on how strong and loyal is the army and other forces

That certainly helps, but there still needs to be some legitimacy (granted this legitimacy is typically gained by brainwashing through the education systems and cultural institutions).

That book you recommended is it in English, also. My feeble mind struggles mightily with learning the Polish language.
AntV   
6 Sep 2020
News / What should Poland do with the problem of Belarus? [1800]

The importance of it all would be to highlight that violence was or was not an effective and important tactic or response to drive the communists to negotiate. If violence against communist authorities was not widespread and sustained (as I understand, it wasn't widespread and sustained, but rare and unsustained), it would not have much if any effect. If it was more common and sustained, it would give the government a reason to negotiate, if for no other reason than keep the Soviets from intervening--something they were prepared to do in 80/81.

You're right, I don't have the experience of living under the regime. My wife and in-laws did, though. So, I know of their experiences. Although, those experiences don't tell me anything about whether or not violent action against the communist regime played a part in the government negotiating with Solidarity.

Didn't you say the Belarussians were being too soft with peaceful demonstrations? Or was that Crow? I get you two confused sometimes; my apologies if you didn't say it.

We agree that communists didn't have patriotic feelings for Poland or cared for the plight of common Polish people, but only cared about power. But, their power depended on what the future of Poland would be--economics plays a central role in that future and a failing economy has a way of putting a regimes power in a precarious position (the uprisings in the 70's and 80 began over food price increases, right?). And, of course they cared what the opinions of the people were, why do you think they had a propaganda division within the government and a tight grip on media?

It would be better to have a war with soviet establishment in Poland provided that Polish side would have been victorious.

Well, yeah, but you seem like a guy who has a punch two guys in the face per day quota. :):) What do you think the chances of a Polish victory would've been? And, wouldn't it have been the Polish commies fighting the Soviet commies? However you slice it, you're left with commies.

F they wouldn't be so damn peaceful and timid then it be much better situation.

How? Besides, Pawian says they weren't that damned peaceful anyhow.
AntV   
5 Sep 2020
News / What should Poland do with the problem of Belarus? [1800]

coz you aren`t Polish, didn`t live in Poland at the time

You just obliterated the study of history. Hahahahaha!!!!!

Communists knew that after peaceful strikes the next step would be violent protests which had already occured in 1981-84

But how much of the violence was begun by protesters? How often did the protesters react violently to government crackdowns? And, how long was the violent reaction of the protesters sustained?

I read a book by Jerzy Urban,

Urban's "admission" is something to consider and may lead to revising my understanding, but, as a general rule, it's best to heavily scrutinize a professional propagandist. Even if it played a part in the Communists decision the violence was a product of economic and political pressures.

Even though there were some elements within Solidarity (including Church clergy) who wanted to employ violent tactics to confront the government, they didn't gain much influence. Solidarity was a non-violent movement.

My position still remains that the Communists were driven to The Round Table because they knew the fragile Polish economy could not sustain more strikes and lack of production and that the unified voice of the Polish people was an undeniable sign that the political legitimacy of the regime was severely compromised. I wouldn't be surprised that the fear of a violent reprisal was present within the regime, but it wasn't violent protests that drove them to negotiations.

The civil war is a disaster in any country.

Hold the phone! But, isn't that what you're calling for in Belarus?
AntV   
5 Sep 2020
News / What should Poland do with the problem of Belarus? [1800]

When angry protesters threw stones which injured the riot police and set fire to their vehicles, was it violent or not?

Yes, it is. But, again, it's not what brought the regime to the negotiation table. If there is evidence that the communist regime wanted to make some concessions with Solidarity because of the violent protests, I'm unaware of it and would be happy to see it.

the communist regime in Poland did not fall because of violent protests, but through more peaceful means (strikes,

economic pressures, and political pressures from the multiplying voices of Polish citizens demanding change). You left the remainder of sentence out.

I appreciate and respect the civil suggestion of an compromise, but it wouldn't be accurate. :)
AntV   
4 Sep 2020
News / What should Poland do with the problem of Belarus? [1800]

how me a source which claims that only strikes contributed to the fall of communism.

I never said it was the only thing that contributed to the fall of communism; I also never said there were never violent confrontations--only that it was the violent confrontations that drove the communists to the negotiating table. Again, was the violence perpetuated by the protesters or the police?
AntV   
4 Sep 2020
News / What should Poland do with the problem of Belarus? [1800]

Tell me, you think that EU seek to offer higher truth to Belarus?

EU is not the Church, it pretty much acknowledged it doesn't care to officially recognize its Christian heritage. It's a thoroughgoing secular construct. So, it can't offer a higher truth, only things like policies, laws, and enforcement.
AntV   
4 Sep 2020
News / What should Poland do with the problem of Belarus? [1800]

Churches are trade guilds.

Hahahaha...maybe where you live; which I imagine is a place of colorful adventure--mostly psychedelic. :)

why upset locals with universal truth?

Because it's truth and universal, it's for all of us, even the locals.
AntV   
3 Sep 2020
News / What should Poland do with the problem of Belarus? [1800]

But today I know more. I mean, I don`t know.

I think you're on to something. :)

Supranational constructs are also Christian Churches. Islam also function that way.

No, they are not. Churches are not concerned with controlling governments, but primarily with spreading the Gospel. Churches do want to inform governments of the dignity of the human person and morality, but its by proposition--not legal mandates. Churches, in general, are part of local cultures--they respect and add to the development of local cultures--they don't promote a global unitarian politic, but a universal truth that informs local cultures. They are constructs where the natural world weaves into the supernatural.
AntV   
3 Sep 2020
News / What should Poland do with the problem of Belarus? [1800]

@ Crow

Poland, freely choose to enter the EU, did it not?

If you could ask them they would tell its not the EU but the other.

Wasn't there a recent Pew survey that showed something like 75% of Poles had a favorable opinion of the EU? I don't know whether that's accurate or not, but I'm willing to bet neither do you. I strongly dislike supranational government constructs and all that, but Poland wasn't bribed or put under any type of duress to enter the EU. It did it under its own free volition.

Besides, what would a Visegrad union give Poland that would match or be better than what the EU gives it? I mean, other than a slavic boner.

The Kremlin spokeswoman accused Poland of meddling into Belarus` affairs

Hahahaha!!!! Isn't that rich?! Maybe the Kremlin has been following PF and has seen your call to a violent uprising.
AntV   
2 Sep 2020
News / What should Poland do with the problem of Belarus? [1800]

The mainstream 30 years back was IMHO (at least in the West) also a lot more conservative/rightist.

*nods

The West was more confident in its heritage, institutions, and values back then, but there were some signs of erosion.

No, Poland isn`t free. For so many reasons more that is more then clear.

How do you define free? Seems like you define free as something that must fit into your personal beliefs...seems kind of tyrannical.
AntV   
1 Sep 2020
News / What should Poland do with the problem of Belarus? [1800]

@ Pawian

Let me clarify: back in 1980, who would've dreamed Poland would be free by 1989? Not too many.

Those pictures of violence in the street in Poland, was the violence perpetuated by the demonstrators or the police?

Most importantly, the communist regime in Poland did not fall because of violent protests, but through more peaceful means (strikes, economic pressures, and political pressures from the multiplying voices of Polish citizens demanding change). Belarus may finally be gathering the multitude of voices to apply the political pressure it needs to get rid of it tyrant--but, it ain't gonna be easy, and I doubt it'll be successful if it becomes violent.
AntV   
1 Sep 2020
News / What should Poland do with the problem of Belarus? [1800]

But, they may very well abolish themselves with violent demos. Regime change can come through peaceful demos--just look at your country. Who would've thought Poland would be free in 1980?

I'd also think Poland would not want 2 hot civil wars going at its border.
AntV   
1 Sep 2020
News / What should Poland do with the problem of Belarus? [1800]

The mainstream was different 30 years back!

That's kind of the point,. 30 years ago, the mainstream media had a lot less competition in what information was being fed to the mainstream population. Ergo, a lot less reason for the mainstream population to distrust the mainstream media. Nowadays, mainstream media has a wide-range of alternative outlets questioning what they report or reporting something different from what's found in mainstream outlets.
AntV   
31 Aug 2020
News / What should Poland do with the problem of Belarus? [1800]

That creation of information oftentimes fills in the holes or provides an opposing angle of the mainstream media. A great thing, IMO.

A survey found out that a majority of Germans still watch and believe the "mainstream" news,

I wonder if that majority is as big as it was 20-30 years ago.
AntV   
22 Aug 2020
News / What should Poland do with the problem of Belarus? [1800]

The sanctions imposed on them in 2014 for invading Ukraine have been quite painful.

But, that's what makes them so dangerous. A rat is most aggressive when cornered. History has plenty examples of cornered rats causing a dustup that wasn't in their best interests. Best to keep reminding the rat of the danger its in and how it could get worse. Worse thing you can do is ignore the rat, IMO.
AntV   
21 Aug 2020
News / What should Poland do with the problem of Belarus? [1800]

so when Lukashenka...calls for Russian troops to deal with too much unrest...society will not oppose it. They will be unhappy but won`t fight...

And, that's the point of concern. If Russia did intervene, they wouldn't do it for free. They'd make demands that would help further their desire for regional supremacy. Belarus would (if Russia desired) become the launching pad to attempt to invoke some kind of turmoil in Poland, Estonia, Lithuania, and/or Latvia. So, it'd seem that it is something Poland should be concerned about and prepare some kind of deterrent or response. I wouldn't over-react but I sure as hell wouldn't be cavalier about it either.
AntV   
20 Aug 2020
News / What should Poland do with the problem of Belarus? [1800]

Would Russia really send troops if pushes come to shove?

That's a good question. If they do, then we got two Russian military actions going on at the doorstep of Poland and the EU, and this one would be at the invitation of the Belrussian gov. One would think such friendliness would allow Russian operatives to roam anywhere in Belarus, even, say ,at the Polish border--might even take a day trip across the border.

The EU (Poland too) is not recognizing the outcome of the latest Belarus election...meaning Lukashenko.

Canada also has officially refused to recognize and the US has said it wasn't a free and fair election, so pressure is mounting. I don't see Lukashenko ceding power, so that Russian support looms even larger day by day.

Today, the EU has to solve other problems than worry about Belarus and their European aspirations.

But, what about Russian inetrvention within Belarus? Wouldn't that change the equation for Poland? If so, then Belarus is worthy of a solution now so as to blunt any such intervention from happening in the (near) future wouldn't you say?
AntV   
5 Jun 2020
Study / School meals in Poland [145]

And then the idiot wanted to give the kids sugar so they could do it themselves!

You ever think it might be because the idiot was traumatized by teachers when she was a kid and its her way of getting back at those bastard teachers?

What's more harrowing for a teacher than a room full of sugared up little brats? Sweet revenge is what she's thinking.
AntV   
13 Mar 2020
News / Presidential elections 2020 - your opinions about campaign, candidates [2222]

It is obvious we don`t understand each other and will never do

I wouldn't say that. I understand you, I just think you're wrong.

Rejecting the bill, PiS sentenced thousands of people to death.

And, that's the opposition's goal. They succeeded with you.

Can we end this futile discussion coz I have said what I needed to and now want to deal with sth else.

Absolutely! Good luck in your ventures.

I'm just throwing this out there, but if you're interested in reading some political philosophy that touches on this thread of thinking, you might give Friedrich Hayek's "The Constitution of Liberty" a look-see. Churchill had a good amount to say about it, too.
AntV   
12 Mar 2020
News / Presidential elections 2020 - your opinions about campaign, candidates [2222]

Do you seriously believe politicians put forward bills for a vote on the floor of parliament without knowing if they have the votes or not?

Unfortunately, it never worked in history

Well, a glaring example of how it worked in history is the defeat of communism. It wasn't simply economic pressures that made it unravel, but, also, the movement of the people (especially in Poland) demanding fundamental human rights that shaked loose the tyranny of communist oppression.

You seem to think putting forward honest proposals is a sign of weakness, but there's nothing more powerful and lethal, and most importantly, enduring. Fighting back with truth isn't slapping PiS with velvet gloves, but a bare knuckle right cross.