The BEST Guide to POLAND
Unanswered  |  Archives 
 
 
User: Guest

Posts by nott  

Joined: 2 Jun 2010 / Male ♂
Last Post: 26 Jul 2011
Threads: 3
Posts: 592

Displayed posts: 595 / page 5 of 20
sort: Oldest first   Latest first   |
nott   
31 Aug 2010
History / When will you Poles give back German land and the cities which you robbed? [557]

I always wondered how many Germans where still left even after the purges of millions after the war...hmmm....

Really few. I remember meeting an old granny in the 70ies, speaking with broken Polish, but mostly with hardly intelligible German. She just stayed there, in Gliwice, she wouldn't have gone this was her place. Her family left, she stayed alone. She remembered the '3 days of freedom'...

edit:

nott:
He was from Jastrzębie,

Sosnowiec.

He was the 1st Secretary in Sosnowiec. Origins from Jastrzębie.

nott: which is Czerwone Zagłębie, which is Aldrajch, not Silesia.

Yes. I am sorry, these areas are so close to each other...... Neighbours! :):):):)

Don't you fcking remind me...
:)
nott   
31 Aug 2010
History / When will you Poles give back German land and the cities which you robbed? [557]

Born in Porąbka, today a district of Sosnowiec, was secretary in Katowice.

But it doesn`t matter, really. What matters is he was from Czerwone Zagłebie which isn`t Silesia.

I might've mixed up something, but for me he was always strongly associated with Jastrzębie for some personal (his) reason.

But, later on, he ruled Silesia and developed it.

Hm, Silesia under Gomulka was already quite developed. The Soviets needed steel. After Gierek went to Warsaw, he introduced more miner's privileges, but people preferred the memory of Ziętek.

Is there some joke I'm missing? :)

Just some of our intra-Polish bickering, nothing to you, dojcze... :)

Geez, midnight. Good night.
nott   
1 Sep 2010
Life / Polish pride. PL stickers, flags and the white eagle! Where does our obsession come from? [79]

I guess it has sth to do with their history. PL has been abused many times throughout her history, enjoyed only 20-odd years of independence after having disappeared from the map, before embarking on 50 years of foreign occupation by first the Nazis, then the Commies. Now that they are finally independent

Etc. I would agree with you in theory, seems plausible. But I can't see 'the problem' in the UK. Hardly any Polish accent, except sometimes on shops with Polish food. And there's a series of Polish sausages with the Polish Eagle, but this is made in the UK clearly by somebody without a clue about Poland. And that's it. With hundreds of thousands of Poles in London itself...
nott   
1 Sep 2010
News / Weekend of carnage as 41 people lose their lives on Poland's roads [44]

if you do have a licence, then you lose the licence as it's the same as drink-driving.

same in Poland.

In the situation, enforcing is the answer, for me. No amount of propaganda will change it.

But this needs a purge in the traffic police, first thing.

Drinking and driving should be regarded as a crime and if you kill sb in an accident when drunk behind the wheel, you're nothing less than a premeditated murderer and should go to jail for at least 10 to 20 years.

Exactly the law in Poland. Which, actually, is a bit over the top. The law should punish the actual offender, and not the one who 'was more likely to'.

To illustrate it: I was a witness of an accident. A drunk was waiting for the bus, and strolling impatiently around all over the road. Rainy November night, no street lights. Suddenly I heard a thud, turned around, and the drunk was down before a guilty looking maluch. Had he been killed, and the driver after two pint of beer, the sentence is like for murder. Hardly just, in fact.
nott   
2 Sep 2010
History / Today is the 1st of September (WWII start in Poland) [138]

The GWOTTC would just have been delayed. The machinery was in place and it was good while still in the 19th century,

I'd agree with you on that. Regardless of what we might think about the undeniable influence of prominent individuals, there are 'powers of masses' that push history this or that way. Similarly, we might 'beat foam' for ages what would be the result of 1919 Treaty, were there not one half-sane Austrian handy. The pressure which BB emphasizes was there, but it takes real people to actually direct it in a particular way.

Thus I equally do not agree with the Great Revolution theory, presented by you. There were reasons for the fall of Louis the Sun, and we can trace them down to the very first moment when one ape used a heavy stick to earn a dinner at the expense of the currently less human ape. And whence this focus on the murderous side of the human nature, in the first place?
nott   
2 Sep 2010
History / Today is the 1st of September (WWII start in Poland) [138]

On the topic I''d agree with you. It's a commemoration of the deceased, but it's a bit over the top. Due to the commie propaganda about murderous Nazi/Germans and benevolent Communist/Russians.

However, if you wanted to commemorate the victims, which date would you choose?
nott   
2 Sep 2010
History / Today is the 1st of September (WWII start in Poland) [138]

It wasn't a Great Revolution that happened in 1914, but the logical consequence of over a hundred years of inadequacy,

Now that's a bit of stretch? It was a century of peace, unparalleled in history. Development of arts and sciences etc. I can see the Clausewitz's professional point of view, but not everybody is supposed to think military, huh?

Incapability to adapt to changing circumstances: A-H, Germany and Russia with their ancient form of administration, ignoring the changing position of classes within society that came with modernisation and industrialisation and ill-equipped to tackle "modern" problems unlike Great Britain and a couple of others had successfully done.

Well... Russia was changing, fast. GB got a shock treatment by the Boers, and Victoria died as well in the meantime, and I don't really see any class movements there anyway. Why do you say it was only the Axis that was so stiff? And thus responsible for the war, presumably?

It's not my theory by the way, but was coined by multiple Historians who, imo, rightfully concluded that the period between 1914 and 1945 was nothing more than a conglomerate of events that were deeply related to one and another. Virtually nothing happened in that period of time which could not be linked in one way or another to other events that happened to an earlier point in that period.

Then you say it was a result of the whole previous century. Of course it was, so it seems that creating 1914 caesura between the Great Revolution and the Great War is just as artificial as stating that Middle Ages ended with the 15 century sharp (exaggeration alert). It's not you and your periodization that I oppose to, actually. This tool is obviously useful. It' that BB's infatuation with Versailles and somehow lame attempt to blame the whole Europe for Hitler. BTW, the 1871 event took place at Versailles too... :)

Btw, Louis Quatorze didn't fall, he just died in his bed in 1715 :) I think you mean Louis 16, his grandson, as this was the one who died under the guillotine.

Oh, never mind. Too many of them, and who cares about the French anyway... :)

Murderous nature of Homo Sapiens? Of course, most, nearly all can be traced back to that, but there are ever changing circumstances in which Homo Sapiens shows his murderous nature :)

And that's the fun of it, right :)

What about the promiscuous nature then? Face (let's say it was) that launches 1000 ships? Didn't it start from food and women? Or maybe the vision of a happier smile of My Kids? Isn't it always about that?

Edit: the discussion is on topic, as the invasion of Poland was part of the GWOTTC. And besides, my question whether there was a commemoration or not has been answered.

Shouldn't we shut up, then. Out of the the respect for principles.

M-G (Louis 14 never washed himself and was the inventor of perfume)

After Kazimir the Great died, Polish nobility sent a delegation to France, to bring a newly elected king. They were appalled with the French barbarism. Dirt, lice, nobody speaking Latin.

-----------------------

What's wrong with 1st of September?

some of those anniversaries, or an overexposure of them, are remnants from commie times.

I thought it was you who didn't really like the date.
nott   
2 Sep 2010
History / Today is the 1st of September (WWII start in Poland) [138]

That wouldn't be Zygmunt August by any chance?

Jesus Christ, will anybody kick the sh1t out of me today for slightly mixing up some long dead egomaniacs?

People have no consideration these days.

edit:
'everybody'

Nott, this is not your day...
nott   
3 Sep 2010
History / Today is the 1st of September (WWII start in Poland) [138]

The French aspirations were mostly manifested by Napoleon, though, and it was him, whose spectre haunted Europe, not Robespierre. 1830 should've pacified those fears, according to your suggestion that more democracy means more peace...

But in all, I agree that it was a relatively peaceful century - in which perhaps the reason also lie for the huge outburst with which the century finally came to an end in 1914. And in 1914 it was shown that the system maintained for such a long time was rotten to the core.

I'd say full of tensions, rather. No tensions in rot. And were it not for the inter-state tensions, each country would've coped with inner tensions in their own backyard. I just can;t see how social development made the war inevitable.

I meant socially, rather. The regime was releasing the screw, thus enabling the 1905 revolution. Typical story. Were it not for the war, Russia might've turned into a modern state with relatively little pain.

nott: Why do you say it was only the Axis that was so stiff?

They were autocratic régimes. Power mainly revolved around the Kaiser or Czar. Parliaments were mainly mere tools to act on his will. And when you have an incompetent individual on tht position, you probably can imagine that the decisions made were not always in pace with the times. In GB parliament had much more power.

But it didn't prevent it from joining the brawl...

nott: And thus responsible for the war, presumably?

Oh, I pertinent disagree with the statement made that the Central Powers were responsible for the war. Each and every belligerent of WW1 carries responsibility. They all had the opportunity to stop the whole thing and yet they did nothing to that effect.

You lost me in this. But if they were more democratic, like GB et consortes, then there would be no war, you said? Or the democratization doesn't prevent war, so the existence of the British Parliament and absence of similar bodies in the Axis was irrelevant. I mean, the axis being behind the times had no relevance to the outbreak of the war. Hm?

nott: creating 1914 caesura

Of course, a caesura is always arteficial. According to Eckstein the breaking point in the heads of the population was the realisation that all the new technology wasn't infallible as they had been thinking in the two decades previous.

Could be. But these deep interpretations are always risky. I mean, take this case. People have just got their brand new new technology, it fails once after 20 years, so they go mad and shoot at each other en masse? Imagine the mayhem created by every Windows crash :)

"The Rites of Spring - the First World War and the Birth of the Modern Age" by Eckstein. It's a good read.

I might, thanks. But after I finish my current reads this thread will be prehistory...

nott: What about the promiscuous nature then? Face (let's say it was) that launches 1000 ships? Didn't it start from food and women? Or maybe the vision of a happier smile of My Kids? Isn't it always about that?

The blanket of civilisation always keeps us from killing our neighbour because he has a bigger car than we have and it would make us and our kids feel better if we had such a car :)

I was being serious. Wars are not just for the fun of it.

nott:
Shouldn't we shut up, then. Out of the the respect for principles.

It's my thread :) But besides, this discussion does imo have some relevance.

Yeah. like that ape stick to Zeppelin.

nott: After Kazimir the Great died, Polish nobility sent a delegation to France, to bring a newly elected king. They were appalled with the French barbarism. Dirt, lice, nobody speaking Latin.

Yeah, the French always spoke French and refused to speak Latin and the main achievements of their efforts to retrieve hegemony was that from the 18th century on, the diplomatic language in all countries was French.

They didn't 'refuse'. They lacked education. Latin was, so to speak, lingua latina. Heh :)

Some ppl say they would like to travel in time back to those days to see what it was like, but if they would, they probably would be vomiting from the smell as soon as they entered a pub or a house or a city: ppl didn't wash themselves until Victoria introduced it in the 1850's,

Well... I don't know about you Westerners, but 'bath' was not unknown in the East before Queen V. Ok, in the UK they invented tourism, went to the seashore, dipped in, hence Bath. We are different, though, no need to build a city to celebrate contact with water...

feces and other nasty stuff were thrown just out of the window into the street (if you were unlucky to pass at that moment...well...:)

They dug out that city in the Indus Valley... even further to the East...
:)

On the other hand, the approach to getting laid was also somewhat different back then; let's say, it was a bit more direct :)

So much for the sexual revolution. I don't believe in revolutions, as you know already :)
nott   
9 Sep 2010
News / Poland hosts lowest proportion of foreigners in the EU [115]

Besides, what all these hate-vids fail to tell you, is that Muslims are not robots as they are presented to be, they do have a choice which passages of the Koran to follow

The second vid doesn't fail to point out that Muslim have no choice. Quran is the Word of God, but the Word changed with time, and the later revelations cancel the earlier ones, if contradictory. Regardless of the source, this is a fact.

The problem with Muslims is not that they have a different religion, nor that they have a religion at all. The problem is that this religion defines their point of view on everything, and this point of view is definitely what most people in Europe wouldn't want to live.

I am not sure about copyright, so just a link:

link
nott   
9 Sep 2010
News / Poland hosts lowest proportion of foreigners in the EU [115]

But isn't (or wasn't) our way of life until relatively recently also dictated by either the Catholic or the Prostestant Churches?

It was like that, but it isn't any more, and we are talking current situation. And still people do follow Christian rules from the past, including some utterly ridiculous, but the Church is changing - and weakening as a result. Apostates had hard time, in the past. Nowadays the severe punishment is, funny thing, exclusion from the Church. In Islam, the punishment is death.

I mean, I agree that Islam runs a little behind on Christianity, but that's also because it's about 700 years younger than Christendom. If you go back in time 700 years we had our witch hunts too and killing of ppl who didn't fit the description the Church gave of how the ideal sheep in the flock had to live.

But you cant' apply the same time-scale to Christianity and Islam. Christianity was developing on it's own, Islam has ready to use hints to adopt. Besides, Christianity was actually always quite open to ideas, and discussion was never considered a crime as such. In Islam not so, that's why it is still in the Middle Ages.

But to put up some sort of hate campaign simply goes too far imo.

Well, if 12 cartoons in a small Allah-forgotten country sparks massive demonstrations and hate speeches from spiritual leaders, then it goes too far in my opinion too. If it is one priest with a bunch of followers, mostly ridiculed by fellow countrymen, then it's more like free speech, imo. I must say I never heard about that book-burning guy.

Still... In Saudi they do not burn Bibles. Reason being, that possession of this book is illegal. Well, to be frank, I do not know what they do with Bibles intercepted on the border... Anyway, that goes a bit further than a private action, doesn't it?
nott   
10 Sep 2010
Life / Polish ghost stories [38]

Catholic Church was trying to fight those pogan believes so tey implemented a Christian holliday - "dzień zaduszny" (the day of all souls).

Um it's not quite like that. All Saints Day is a Christian holiday, November 1st, with masses etc. Zaduszki is the next day.

In a way, quite a sinister holiday. That's when people visit family graves, often far from where they live, and plenty 'Sunday drivers' hit the roads. Combined with the short day and typically bad November weather, the holiday results in about 50 fatalities every year, far above average.

Hitman's story is the top one... I never had anything like direct encounter with ghosts, only heard some. Quite a lot of them in Poland, I'd say.
nott   
10 Sep 2010
News / Poland hosts lowest proportion of foreigners in the EU [115]

minorities - they are in less numbers than we are, why are they considered a threat in that case?

Future threat, and that's what the vids were about. Even if the trends presented in the video are not accurate, there's little doubt that the natives have far smaller reproduction rate than the Muslims. If it stays like that, then in, say, two generations at most, Muslims can strongly influence politics in France, UK, Germany. Personally, I wouldn't be happy about that.
nott   
10 Sep 2010
News / Poland hosts lowest proportion of foreigners in the EU [115]

Open society confronted with an expansionist totalitarian system, straight from the book. Sikhs are quite strict in their faith, yet they don't spill it on others, no problem with them. They have a few privileges, but they don't abuse them. Orthodox Jews - same thing. Both religions have their True and Only God, yet they don't care about those miserables who can't see the truth. None of them would demand 'religious hours' on the public swimming pool, with specific dress code. Muslims did, and got what they wanted.

nott: Future threat

That very well may be, as nobody can see in the future. There is a chance that they will start to influence govts of respective countries, but this doesn't necessary mean a bad influence. Say that they want more mosks as the number is low. I wouldn't have a particular problem with that.

I would. Not with the mosques as such, but with the influence. One of Muslim duties is Jihad, struggle, which boils down to promoting Islam by any workable ways. And they treat their religion seriously, not like Europeans.

I'm not a big fan of sharia law and all that jazz as I am not a fan of religion as such, but maybe it's just a way of profiling themselves. The more Europe is bashing on them, the more fanatic they will get. It's a natural response, you should know that as Poles under the Communist yoke turned massively to the Catholic Church.

Europe didn't bash them into Khomeini regime, nor into Saudi et al. Expansionism is the very core of Islam, and every Muslim will tell you that, if approached carefully. Allah is the only God, The Word is The Truth, and the Truth is to be followed by everybody.

Poland is a different story altogether.

What I think will happen, and neither I can look in the future, so it will all remain a guess, is that the numbers will level eventually and the Muslims will become so Westernized that they kinda automatically will adhere to the various standards of life we maintain.

They might, I can see some examples myself. One, actually, and this is an example of a person brought up in Finland, in a Muslim family isolated from a Muslim community, immersed in the West, so to speak. Perfect example of what you'd want to see. A devout Muslim with quite liberal approach to life and people. And I know other Muslims, apparently totally Westernised, and I spoke with them. Conclusions are not optimistic. These are people who might not like a too direct approach to spreading the God's Word, but they will not oppose it.

Muslims living in a Muslim community is another thing, and the more they follow the imams, peaceful or not, the worse it gets.

One particular project is especially successful: in a relatively small neighbourhood in Rotterdam live app. 5000 ppl, of which about 3/4 is immigrant and the rest locals. (...)

If this project is considered particularly successful, then the future is dark.

People left to themselves developed a troubled society. This was only rectified by an outside intervention, and in a country dedicated to maintain peace regardless of ideologies involved. Were the government dominated by Muslims, the outcome would be quite different. No suggesting pork to Muslim butcher.

This particular idea itself, from my London perspective, is hard to believe. There was a case of a Muslim who sued Tesco for trying to make him to handle beer cans with a forklift. One of my Westernised Muslims was offered a sandwich, then he saw it's meat, inquired about what meat it is, and politely refused on religious grounds. Fair enough, only he left shortly after, for a minute, to wash his hands. A quick cleansing. Until then I thought he was a Hindu, or maybe a Christian.

It may be a small example, but it gives hope for a better future without hatred.

It is a small example indeed. I don't claim that Muslims are totally incapable of adapting - which is a condition sine qua non, as you say yourself. If Islam was any closer to the European Christianity as it is now, I'd see little problem. First thing is, Islam must change. It doesn't where it's strong, and the dynamics of it's spread doesn't give much opportunity to the common Muslim folk.

Edit: about the low birth rates in Europe: that's an ongoing problem within all Western countries - you can't hardly blame the rise of Islam for that.

And I don't. And I don't blame Muslims for high birth rate, and I don't blame French for low birth rate. Things are developing, in a direction I do not like.

As far as I know, Christianity, Judaism and Islam all believe in the same god. Jesus Christ is recognized in the Koran as an important prophet. And there are other things that are similar.

There is a place in Hell dedicated for infidels, Jews and Christians included, and in prominent place. That's what I learned from an Islamic 'primer'. So if the message starts with complete and brutal exclusion of non-Muslims, then what is the attitude in the inner circles?

If both parties are willing, then a pace inter pares is very well pssbl.

If. Both. Google for 'Akkari file'.
nott   
10 Sep 2010
News / Poland hosts lowest proportion of foreigners in the EU [115]

nott:There is a place in Hell dedicated for infidels, Jews and Christians included, and in prominent place. That's what I learned from an Islamic 'primer'. So if the message starts with complete and brutal exclusion of non-Muslims, then what is the attitude in the inner circles?

How does this differ from Christian belief?

Doesn't Christianity do the same?

It was an answer to 'Muslims see Christians as brothers'. They don't.

Christians never claimed Muslim-love. Until recently. The Church changes, all the time.

I think the vid raps of a birth rate among Muslims of 8.1 on average. I don't think this number is correct

Neither do I, actually. Still it's significantly bigger than white's. 2-3 children per family is more than 1-2, this not including couples with no children at all. And there are no French immigrants coming to France, as opposed to Muslims.
nott   
10 Sep 2010
News / Poland hosts lowest proportion of foreigners in the EU [115]

I guess so. Except that Macedonia is on the 21/22 list:

keeptonyblairforpm.wordpress.com/2009/12/09/of-the-22-world-conflicts-around-the-world-21-are-muslim/

edit: (You missed the point, and I got baited. The discussion was on theological points, not on practice of living)

Muslims are peaceful in the UK too. Except stubborn attempts on blowing up some passers-by.

Ok, this is a 'radical minority with no support in the majority of peaceful, hard-working Muslims'. The second part of this sentence bothers me, though. No general open support, granted. Quiet acceptance, seems like. Open support by some leaders, documented.

'Seems like' needs explanation. As I hinted already, I have some close contacts with Westernised Muslims here. Quite willing to discuss Islam, as the faith requires. One conversation started with my blunt question about Muslim terrorists, and the answer was prompt and curt 'idiots'. So I asked about Jihad, and now the picture was somehow different: there is High and Low Jihad, the high one being personal struggle for perfection, the low one happening to be violent against other people. But which is the true one? People have right to personal interpretations and still be Muslims, as Islam is One. No condemnation, then.

Since then I got sensitized to opinions on terror by Muslims, and I met 1(one) person who satisfied me. That girl brought up in Finland: 'these are NOT true Muslims!'. So Islam is a religion of peace, yet warmongers are a legitimate part of it .

The topic seems to be wandering
nott   
10 Sep 2010
History / Poland provoked Germany to start WW2 by mobilising first [94]

An acknowledgement at least would be a first step...nothing to speak of an apology (maybe later).

I was just reading the same article, out of curiosity what Wiki says.

In the first years after the war, the bishop of Katowice Stanisław Adamski criticized the expulsion of Germans as inhumane. In 1965, a group of Polish bishops made a particularly important overture by sending a letter to their German counterparts in which they asked forgiveness for the wrongs perpetrated during the expulsion and at the same time offered forgiveness for German war crimes. (...)

The Polish role in the expulsions could not be contemplated in Poland until the end of the Cold War. (...)

In 1995, Polish foreign minister Władysław Bartoszewski expressed regret about the suffering of innocent Germans during the expulsions in a speech held before German parliament and federative council. (...)

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flight_and_expulsion_of_Germans_from_Pola nd_during_and_after_World_War_II

Well...
nott   
13 Sep 2010
History / Warsaw Uprising - The Forgotten Soldiers [117]

Nope...Hitler tried till shortly before the invasion to get Poland on his good side...

There was a 10 year non-aggression pact of 1934, with Germany recognizing its Eastern borders.

German policy changed drastically in late 1938, after the annexation of Sudetenland sealed the fate of Czechoslovakia and Poland became Hitler's next target. This a Wiki interpretation, so you might not agree. However, 1934 + 10 seems a bit later later than 1938, innit? Hitler broke the pact with provocative demands.

BB, Poland is not responsible for the WW2. Western Poland of 1920 was nothing more that Poland had before the partitions, and even slightly less. Poznan was never a German city. It's not like everything becomes German forever, wherever a German foot trod once. Stop being ridiculous, please.

I understand you want to grow some balls after three generations of kowtow. But please.
nott   
16 Sep 2010
History / German cemeteries in Wroclaw [17]

I gave up on fighting the PFs attitude to attachments, here's the link to translation

mediafire.com/download.php?20xpj9zd03crwle

The fate of pre-war German cemeteries in Wroclaw reminds fates of Polish necropolies in Kresy. But if some of Polish cemeteries there, albeit neglected, do exist until today, then German cemeteries in Wroclaw have not survived almost at all. Implementing the policy of fighting the German past of the city, the post-war Communist authorities of Poland did a lot to erase the 'German stains' form the map of Wroclaw.

By the end of the war, Wroclaw was not only a sea of ruins, but it reminded a great cemetery as well. The city was studded with graves. Many squares and parks, and even private backyards, during the time of Festung Breslau became places of improvised burials.

the original article, with pictures:

wroclawzwyboru.blox.pl/2008/11/Pamietajcie-o-cmentarzach-ktorych-nie-ma.html

Enjoy. So to speak.

Let me know if you got it, BB.

Oh, and everybody welcome to share opinions, of course.
nott   
16 Sep 2010
History / German cemeteries in Wroclaw [17]

Yes, I've got it....thank you again!
(And yes, I'm serious)

Ok, Ok :) I just wanted to be sure you are really interested. Otherwise it would be waste of time.

but military cemeteries was new to me.

There's a little nuance here, I think... Military cemetery, to me, includes some central glorifying memorial to the army. Hardly anything to expect in our case. These I would call 'German/Wehrmacht soldiers' cemeteries', and, as I am trying to recall now, this his how they are described in Poland most often. Maybe just my Polish linguistic hair-splitting.

It is always a difficult situation to have the graves of enemy soldiers on your own soil.

In Poland it's a Catholic (and, consequently, cultural) thing, I'd guess. They are dead now, before the Judge, let them rest in peace, and a candle and short prayer are not out of place either. People now, not enemies any more, after a while. In face of Death we are all equal, like. Children are taught this. Were, at least.

I have different emotions regarding the huge soviet war cemetery in Treptow too...but in the end it's all about young boys who never had a choice anyhow and died far from home. They should at least rest in peace too.

...but, the soviet cemeteries are a different thing. Boys are boys, but their graves carry a hated symbol, and in the middle of it there is a huge memorial to 'our brave and selfless liberators'. Neither in Poland nor in Germany they were seen like that, generally. So it's a brazen lie, first of all, and only then a cemetery.

I didn't mention it before, but that search 'profanacja cmentarzy niemieckich' flooded my screen with pages about desecration of soviet graves. Some of it could've been a leftie spin, but definitely not all of it. The small minority of desecrations were on Jewish cemeteries and on Christian cemeteries, by Satanists, apparently.

Edit:

rock:'' ....After having lost their lives on this land they become our sons as well''

That is really an extraordinary sentiment...it shows real personal greatness!

Seconded...
nott   
16 Sep 2010
History / German cemeteries in Wroclaw [17]

Boys are boys,

and especially that those boys weren't knights in shining armour either.
nott   
16 Sep 2010
History / Battle of Wizna, WWII invasion. [13]

Eh? Were you hiding ?

Just didn't happen to draw my attention. My historical education is rather haphazard, and I wasn't particularly interested in the September Campaign.

For example, the 'cavalry against tanks' - I knew a different story than the currently prevailing. There was a German documentary showing clearly ulans charging at tanks. The explanation was, the surrounded cavalry unit chose a surprising charge as a means of breaking through. Tanks formation was the best choice in the situation, and the whole thing showed the clearness of mind of a Polish commander rather, than obvious stupidity. Losses were insignificant, 2 or 3 people. This might've been some other event, though, not Krojanty, I don't remember.

Question remains, how come there was a German cameraman at the ready during a surprising charge.