/ Updated rules
The whole warning system is nonsense.
So if you break a single rule, one time (could be by mistake), we should ban you rightaway?
ban *** deniers
Ok, maybe you'll come up with a list of deniers that should be banned. For a start:
- God deniers,
- Global warming deniers,
- Smolensk crash-plane deniers,
- Spherical-Earth deniers,
- Extraterrestrial deniers,
- Organic food deniers,
How would it work in your ideal world? If we start banning for opinions, where would it end?
there seems to be no consensus as to what constitutes racial abuse.
Correct - there is actually no consensus on most things.
That's news to me, I must say.
Have you missed the Random Chat topic, regularly removed from this site.
That rule simply doesn't work.
What do you mean it 'doesn't work.' - the rule states that we prefer not to discuss such topic, but we don't ban for doing so.
A set of rules is a guidance. If you regularity abuse it, you are likely to get a warning or a ban. At the same time, rules are not equal; abusing or trolling will get caught faster than posting an off-topic message, for example.