Sandman
26 Oct 2010
News / Polish Lithuanian Diplomatic War? At last. [533]
I'm puzzled by Lithuanians who apparently see the Commonwealth as Polish "occupation." Someone here posted a map of GDL's expansion in the 14th century. What's striking on that map is that the ethnically Lithuanian area makes up maybe 20% of that GDL, tops. The remaining 80% is land taken from Ruthenians (today's Belorusians/Ukrainians). This map was posted to illustrate how "great" GDL was before the Commonwealth.
My question: why is it that when Lithuania expands east it's seen as "greatness" of the GDL, but when Poland expands east it suddenly becomes an "occupation" of GDL? By this logic, wasn't the 14th cent. GDL nothing more than a Lithuanian occupation of ethnically Ruthenian lands? Why are the 15-18th cent. Poles "occupiers", but the 14th cent. Lithuanians are not? The only difference I see here is in who's doing the "occupying".
Something here reeks of hypocrisy...
I'm puzzled by Lithuanians who apparently see the Commonwealth as Polish "occupation." Someone here posted a map of GDL's expansion in the 14th century. What's striking on that map is that the ethnically Lithuanian area makes up maybe 20% of that GDL, tops. The remaining 80% is land taken from Ruthenians (today's Belorusians/Ukrainians). This map was posted to illustrate how "great" GDL was before the Commonwealth.
My question: why is it that when Lithuania expands east it's seen as "greatness" of the GDL, but when Poland expands east it suddenly becomes an "occupation" of GDL? By this logic, wasn't the 14th cent. GDL nothing more than a Lithuanian occupation of ethnically Ruthenian lands? Why are the 15-18th cent. Poles "occupiers", but the 14th cent. Lithuanians are not? The only difference I see here is in who's doing the "occupying".
Something here reeks of hypocrisy...