News /
Poland's aid to Ukraine if Russia invades - part 25 [979]
it's just a big bomb.
It's not just a big bomb.
It's quite literally thousands of times more powerful, than a big bomb.
A very, very big bomb - may contain 1 or 2 tons of explosive material.
A very, very, small nuclear bomb - like the one used at Hiroshima (Little Boy) - has a TNT equivalent power of 15 kilotons. That's 15,000 TONS of TNT.
That is, the Hiroshima bomb - a crude device made in 1945 - was already 7,000 to 15,000 times more powerful than the most powerful bombs.
Modern Russian nuclear devices, average 150-300 kilotons. That is - 10 to 20 TIMES MORE POWERFUL THAN HIROSHIMA.
What's more, each missile carries 6 or more of these re-entry vehicles. So one Russian missile, can have an explosive yield of more than a megaton of TNT equivalent. So, it is 60 to a 120 times more powerful than the bomb dropped on Hiroshima.
I think you are confused.
damage would not resemble the Hiroshima perspective, UNLESS they use 100 bombs, as they did in Hiroshima, not a single bomb.
Very curious to understand what histories you are reading. The rest of the world, knows that only one bomb was dropped on Hiroshima - but Ron2 knows about 100.
Lol.
A modern Russian missile will make Hiroshima look like child's play.
To bomb and flatten ALL EU cities over 100K, Russia would need 500 nuclear weapons. Why would they have 10 times more
Again - the "nuclear weapons" are warheads, or RE-ENTRY VEHICLES. There can be many, on a single missile.
When you understand this, then you can see that Russia has exactly the amount of nukes it needs.
The multiple re-entry vehicles are necessary, to ensure that the target will be destroyed - regardless of attempts to intercept it.