The BEST Guide to POLAND
Unanswered  |  Archives [3] 
  
Account: Guest

Posts by Paulina  

Joined: 31 Jan 2008 / Female ♀
Warnings: 1 - Q
Last Post: 30 Oct 2025
Threads: Total: 19 / Live: 13 / Archived: 6
Posts: Total: 4833 / Live: 3824 / Archived: 1009
From: Poland
Speaks Polish?: yes

Displayed posts: 3837 / page 25 of 128
sort: Latest first   Oldest first   |
Paulina   
12 Aug 2024
History / Poles and (Polish) Jews... Victims of war... and beyond [380]

@call1n, you're sick in the head.

Before 1989 the reported total figure of deaths at Auschwitz was 4 million.

That was the Soviet Union estimate. The Nazis destroyed most of the documentation, so it wasn't known how many exactly people were murdered. The Soviet committee made a mathematical estimate - they took into consideration the number of days and the capacity of crematoria. According to the report of Witold Pilecki, who was a prisoner of Auschwitz-Birkenau camp himself, it could be from 2 million to 5 million people.

A quote from Wikipedia (my translation from Polish):

"When I went out from Auschwitz (27.04.1943) 97 000 prisoners with tattooed numbers were murdered. That number had nothing to do with with the number of undocumented people who were being gassed and burned by their masses. Over two million of them were killed. I've given those numbers roughly in order not to exaggerate. My colleagues, who were prisoners for longer than me and witnessed 8000 people being gassed a day, give the estimate of 5 million people."

So, the problem was that up to 80% people who were sent to Auschwitz-Birkenau camp didn't get to be prisoners - after arrival at the camp they were sent straight to gas chambers and burnt. Those were Jews from Poland and all over Europe.
So, there was even no bodies that you could count after the camp was liberated.

As you can see - those higher numbers weren't due to some kind of ill will or intent to fool people. Over the years due to historical research those numbers were simply verified.
Paulina   
12 Aug 2024
History / Poles and (Polish) Jews... Victims of war... and beyond [380]

the Polish resistance would have got wind of it, and come to aid the Jews in escape from the camps.

In Auschwitz-Birkenau camp alone around 1 million Jews, 70 000 Poles, 21 000 Roma people and 14 000 Soviet POWs were murdered. It would be simply impossible to save so many people in an occupied country. Your anti-Semitism damaged your brain lol
Paulina   
11 Aug 2024
News / A Polish Feminist Found in a Forest [133]

So, you're saying that those women in medical units were a "burden"?
As medics - no. In the trenches

Medics are needed in trenches too.

Women around combat have usually been in supporting roles away from the front line. Even Israel found it necessary to not deploy women in fighting grunt roles.

And why are you talking to me about this, maf...?? :))

Most men are hard-wired to respond to distressed women (under thirtyish) differently than distressed men.

LOL
So women over 30 are "disposable" then? :D
Paulina   
11 Aug 2024
News / A Polish Feminist Found in a Forest [133]

Norethisterone

Well, there you go, problem solved! lol

Maybe you really are a man pretending to be a woman as others on here have suspected.

Not all women are on pills, "genius".

...and become an additional burden for men when the bodies are falling left and right.

Tell that to Soviet female veterans (quote from Wiki):

"Soviet women played an important role in World War II. While most worked in industry, transport, agriculture and other civilian roles, working double shifts to free up enlisted men to fight and increase military production, a sizable number of women served in the army. The majority were in medical units."

So, you're saying that those women in medical units were a "burden"? Who needs people who save lives, right? lol 🙄
Paulina   
11 Aug 2024
News / A Polish Feminist Found in a Forest [133]

@Poloniusz, plenty of women were deployed to war zones for months (and that means they menstruated). Those women have more balls than you ever will.
Paulina   
9 Aug 2024
Off-Topic / Music Thread - part 2 [970]

[login to read]
Paulina   
7 Aug 2024
Off-Topic / Music Thread - part 2 [970]

[login to read]
Paulina   
7 Aug 2024
Off-Topic / Music Thread - part 2 [970]

[login to read]
Paulina   
7 Aug 2024
Off-Topic / Music Thread - part 2 [970]

[login to read]
Paulina   
7 Aug 2024
Off-Topic / Music Thread - part 2 [970]

[login to read]
Paulina   
7 Aug 2024
Off-Topic / Music Thread - part 2 [970]

[login to read]
Paulina   
7 Aug 2024
Off-Topic / Music Thread - part 2 [970]

[login to read]
Paulina   
7 Aug 2024
Off-Topic / Music Thread - part 2 [970]

[login to read]
Paulina   
7 Aug 2024
Off-Topic / Music Thread - part 2 [970]

[login to read]
Paulina   
7 Aug 2024
Off-Topic / Music Thread - part 2 [970]

[login to read]
Paulina   
7 Aug 2024
Off-Topic / Music Thread - part 2 [970]

[login to read]
Paulina   
7 Aug 2024
Off-Topic / Music Thread - part 2 [970]

[login to read]
Paulina   
7 Aug 2024
Off-Topic / Music Thread - part 2 [970]

[login to read]
Paulina   
7 Aug 2024
Off-Topic / Music Thread - part 2 [970]

[login to read]
Paulina   
6 Aug 2024
Off-Topic / Music Thread - part 2 [970]

[login to read]
Paulina   
6 Aug 2024
Off-Topic / Music Thread - part 2 [970]

[login to read]
Paulina   
5 Aug 2024
News / A Polish Feminist Found in a Forest [133]

I did some googling and...

like airforce and the navy maybe

...it turnes out I'm a genius ;D Percentage-wise the most women in the US military serve in airforce and the navy is in second place - this is also reflected in the number of female generals in each branch :)
Paulina   
5 Aug 2024
News / A Polish Feminist Found in a Forest [133]

There are a total of 601 women in the Army Infantry for the US.

Wow, so few? Where the rest serves then?

They wont be leading the charge for the US Army at any point.

I've just read that the ban on women serving in front-line combat positions in the US military was lifted only in 2013. I've got to say that I'm surprised that it happened only so recently.

That said, I think women can make fine soldiers in support, especially technical roles.

Here's a short, but interesting Polish article about women in the army:

polska-zbrojna.pl/Mobile/ArticleShow/12836?fbclid=IwY2xjawEdfpNleHRuA2FlbQIxMQABHZsdjJ8xEPR8ZHbAKYoVEF9kjVDjaXxQjhfWdZOvakx7FW8xiO931jazxQ_aem_b9oBKkuZg-FD90ngeg90fA

A big war seems to be a big "reality check" situation. During World War II at first the British command thought that it would be too "manly" for a woman to pull a trigger and take down an airplane (=kill someone), so they allowed women to be in charge only of control devices. But since fights intensified women had to start taking down airplanes too. The first kill by a woman happened in April 1942. In 1943 already 56 000 women served in British air defence forces (including Winston Churchill's daughter).

Another interesting fact - apparently commanders were more concerned about women being captured by the enemy (we all know why), then about them getting killed and that's why women were being given positions where there was zero risk of getting captured (even if the risk of getting killed was high).

Todays movement is nothing like its origins, and I think many of those originators would be displeased to see how the movement is today.

Well, firstly, of course it's different, because in the past women had to fight for the most basic rights. Secondly, feminists aren't some kind of monolith. They have different views, different goals in different parts of the world, etc. As for originators being displeased - I think that would depend on what you have in mind.
Paulina   
4 Aug 2024
News / A Polish Feminist Found in a Forest [133]

@Novichok, sports - yes, for reasons I've explained on the forum before already. As for restrooms - as a woman I wouldn't be bothered by sharing a restroom with fully transitioned transgender (hormones + d1ck chopped off).
Paulina   
4 Aug 2024
News / A Polish Feminist Found in a Forest [133]

@Novichok, by "self-explanatory" I meant that fragment "being born" which I think should be enough of an indication whom I consider to be a woman. Because that's what you wanted to know, right? What's my stance on transgender issues?

Well, in case you're still in doubt - I don't consider men who identify as women to be really women, because biologically they simply aren't. I don't hate them though and I don't have any ill feelings towards them. I may address them as "Kate" or "Susan" if that makes them feel better, but that's as far as I can go.
Paulina   
4 Aug 2024
News / A Polish Feminist Found in a Forest [133]

Only feminist women are arguing for more integration.

Depends which feminists. I am for applying common sense, logic and just being realistic. This doesn't mean I think there should be no women in the army, obviously. There are roles they can take or maybe even branches in which they can serve without putting anyone in danger, so to speak, where physical strength doesn't matter that much - like airforce and the navy maybe. Btw, how are women doing in the US infantry? 🤔 Are there any complaints about them "underperforming"?

Close but still not good enough

Well, I don't know what you want to hear then. "Being born a woman" is pretty self-explanatory for me. And a woman is the same as "an adult human female".
Paulina   
4 Aug 2024
News / A Polish Feminist Found in a Forest [133]

Feminists are Marxists.

Of course not, what a load of bullsh1t lol

The point of drafting women would be for support roles allowing more men to engage the enemy.

From what I've noticed that's not what anti-feminist men want though - they want women to die in the battlefields like men. If they didn't then those men would complain that it's not "full equality", because women are getting "lighter roles". 🤷 So, on one hand they say women are unfit for those "heavier roles" in the military, but they want women to perform them anyway? Why? Out of spite? Stupidity?

Hey, Paulina, what is a woman?

I guess the simplest answer is - someone who was born a woman.