AntV
22 Feb 2020
News / Why is Poland so hostile against Germany? Do they realize how their reparations rubbish damages relations? [510]
That's my belief, it's simply a matter of misperception--probably fueled by the personal dislike the Great Combover and Merkel have for each other (but that is a mutual feeling between the two--it's not a one-way street). I'm not aware of the Orange Crush putting forward anything that actually weakens or severely harms Germany.
Absolutely and unequivocally not!
You raise a very important point that begs a clarification. Strictly speaking, a soveriegnist could be of any stripe as long as he adheres to national independence and integrity--this could include communists, fascists, etc. So, we need to distinguish between the types of sovereignists. The sovereignists I defined in my previous post can be called a Democratic Sovereignist.
Humanity is at the very root of being a democratic sovereignist . Humanity is what is sacrosanct to the democratic sovereignist. The democratic sovereignist is motivated by the liberty of the human person to govern himself (done through representative government). The state is not viewed as an idol to be worshipped, but a vehicle to serve the popular will of the people and protect the rights of individuals.
I agree, also. There is nothing inherently evil in such constructs. But what recourse do you have when such a construct no longer...
How does the people hold a supranational regime accountable?
My main point is that globalist constructs actually weaken the liberty and rights of individuals.
Might be that we conceive Trump totally differently.
That's my belief, it's simply a matter of misperception--probably fueled by the personal dislike the Great Combover and Merkel have for each other (but that is a mutual feeling between the two--it's not a one-way street). I'm not aware of the Orange Crush putting forward anything that actually weakens or severely harms Germany.
Would a sovereignist be willing to reject his humanity and eternal life for the sovereignty of his state?
Absolutely and unequivocally not!
You raise a very important point that begs a clarification. Strictly speaking, a soveriegnist could be of any stripe as long as he adheres to national independence and integrity--this could include communists, fascists, etc. So, we need to distinguish between the types of sovereignists. The sovereignists I defined in my previous post can be called a Democratic Sovereignist.
Humanity is at the very root of being a democratic sovereignist . Humanity is what is sacrosanct to the democratic sovereignist. The democratic sovereignist is motivated by the liberty of the human person to govern himself (done through representative government). The state is not viewed as an idol to be worshipped, but a vehicle to serve the popular will of the people and protect the rights of individuals.
I agree with BB in that there is nothing inherently evil in supranational organisations/governance
I agree, also. There is nothing inherently evil in such constructs. But what recourse do you have when such a construct no longer...
benefits our people; if it increases the well-being of families, freedom of speech/beliefs and safety,
How does the people hold a supranational regime accountable?
My main point is that globalist constructs actually weaken the liberty and rights of individuals.