Paulina
1 Apr 2024
News / Brilliant Poles and Polesses - presentation [65]
This issue is more important than my abuse of you. I called you an a$$hole before and you read my posts anyway. So, I think it's just a lame excuse made by you - similar to those made by Novichok when he's losing an argument.
AI users won't get more "creative" ;D They will simply prompt art styles of other artists. They already do.
AI art generators aren't capable of inventing new art styles. There's one typical, generic "AI style" that those AI generators usually produce, but because it always looks the same people instantly recognise it and get bored by it. That's why they prompt art styles of existing arists. They can't create anything new on their own.
I read long articles written by authors who don`t abuse readers. :):):)
This issue is more important than my abuse of you. I called you an a$$hole before and you read my posts anyway. So, I think it's just a lame excuse made by you - similar to those made by Novichok when he's losing an argument.
Another comment:
He became famous only because people are new to SD and just copy the same prompt and tweak it, he will slowly fade into history as people get more creative.
He became famous only because people are new to SD and just copy the same prompt and tweak it, he will slowly fade into history as people get more creative.
AI users won't get more "creative" ;D They will simply prompt art styles of other artists. They already do.
AI art generators aren't capable of inventing new art styles. There's one typical, generic "AI style" that those AI generators usually produce, but because it always looks the same people instantly recognise it and get bored by it. That's why they prompt art styles of existing arists. They can't create anything new on their own.