PolishForums LIVE  /  Archives [3]    
 
Archives - 2005-2009 / News  % width278

New York Post : "Polish" Death Camps and more


Bratwurst Boy  8 | 11927  
29 Jul 2009 /  #151
Europe will be better off shedding the shackles of this foreign, un-european, middle eastern, desert religion.
We will be stronger once we find back to our real roots!
Babinich  1 | 453  
29 Jul 2009 /  #152
We will be stronger once we find back to our real roots!

Boche roots no doubt.
Bratwurst Boy  8 | 11927  
29 Jul 2009 /  #153
Well...it precedes all nationstates...:)

But maybe you feel really more in common with the Arabs and the Jews than with your fellow Europeans...your choice!
Pan Kazimierz  1 | 195  
29 Jul 2009 /  #154
Yeah.....sure....lifelong house arrest for Galileo, burned at a stake for Giordano Bruno...Darwin...even Copernicus....my what a light the church was for all researcher and truth seeker! :):):)

Lifelong house arrest for Galileo for having directly and publicly insulted the Pope, not for being a scientist. His celestial orbit theory wasn't even the right one. He believed in the perfect circular orbit, as opposed to Copernicus' elliptical. Further, his punishment was really extremely light given the times. Hell, they even provided him with servants.

Please do feel free to tell us all the injustices suffered by these scientists, particularly Copernicus, and under what charges and for what reasons (my net is screwing with me, so I can't kill that one directly). Because last I checked, Copernicus had his book published through his friend the Bishop, dedicated it to the Pope, and died an old man, peacefully, in his bed. Of a stroke.

From what I recall of Bruno, he was the only scientist to ever have been killed during the Inquisition, probably more because he was a Pantheist than a scientist, seeing as the Church funded and supported scientific advancements on a regular basis. Unless I'm thinking of someone else, I'm not particularly sure.

And do share with us the extreme horrors inflicted upon Charles Darwin, other than the naming of the Darwin Award.

Listening to you Kaz one could wonder what the infamous Inquisition was for if all were so happy together...

You do know the Inquisition only had authority over proclaimed Christians, right?
The politics of the time mandated, through no extraordinary majoritarian discriminatory policy, certain privileges available for Christians that were not for other religious groups. The purpose was to determine the actual Christianity of people who proclaimed themselves Christians in order to obtain said privileges, as to declare such and continue with other practices and teachings was also common practice in those times. Still not exactly humane by modern standards, but I'm betting that's not what you thought it was either.

On the other hand, you could tell me about Jews living in Polish lands, Poles living in German lands, French living in British lands, and Italians living in Spanish lands on a regular basis being nothing unusual in Middle Ages Europe, sharing as they did a common faith and in many ways identity, whereas one still can't get various regional ethnicities in Africa to mix today.

Everybody had to...it was not as if the church left the people with much choices.
If they wanted to avoid getting tortured and killed in the name of God (all for their own best of course).

Everybody had to... be a clergyman? Are you serious?
And everyone that wasn't a clergyman was tortured and killed?
Or even nearly everybody?
Or even a majority?
Or even a significant minority?
Let's not kid ourselves, here. You can't claim that Copernicus became a clergyman because he was afraid of being tortured and killed otherwise. Seriously. It doesn't work. And whatever that source you quoted, you should stop reading it, because the person who wrote it was apparently retarded. "Feared for their lives", indeed!
Bratwurst Boy  8 | 11927  
29 Jul 2009 /  #155
You can't claim that Copernicus became a clergyman because he was afraid of being tortured and killed otherwise. Seriously. It doesn't work.

Well..it's kind of like during the Nazi- or Commie times...
When you were some peasant in some remote little village it didn't matter as much as if you tried to achieve something. For centuries there was no way to get somewhere without using the monopol the Church had.

So yes...it was important that you had the right belief, the right connections etc., don't play daft here!

But it's really fruitless to talk with religious nutters.
I just take pleasure in watching the church struggle to get heard anymore at all.
What a power the Vatican once was now he must watch what he says...who takes them seriously anymore! What a fall from grace...still falling...:)

A Large dated compilation of Christian Crimes since its advent:

As soon as Christianity became legal in the Roman Empire by imperial edict (315), more and more pagan temples were destroyed by Christian mob. Pagan priests were killed.

Between 315 and 6th century thousands of pagan believers were slain.

<
SeanBM  34 | 5781  
29 Jul 2009 /  #156
A Large dated compilation of Christian Crimes since its advent:

Well apart from that BB, what have the Christians ever done wrong? ;)

Someone will come shouting for a link soon.

Power hungry man seems to always want to manipulate and therefore control other people.
A waste of time if you ask me, look with in yourselves.
Bratwurst Boy  8 | 11927  
29 Jul 2009 /  #157
Someone will come shouting for a link soon.

Thanks for your post now I can post the rest too...(somehow it didn't work first)

captaincynic.com/thread/48859/christian-crimes-against-humanity.htm

Okay...and on it goes:

....
To summarize: Before the arrival of the English, the western Abenaki people in New Hampshire and Vermont had numbered 12,000. Less than half a century later about 250 remained alive - a destruction rate of 98%. The Pocumtuck people had numbered more than 18,000, fifty years later they were down to 920 - 95% destroyed.

What a blessing they were for mankind...(sarcasm)
Torq  
29 Jul 2009 /  #158
BB

Stop quoting your captainbullcrap.com site and check the thread below...

polishforums.com/off-topic-lounge-deletable-47/votes-nazis-35295/3/#msg689404

...where we already discussed the Holy Inquisition issue :)

"Estimated one million victims (Cathar heresy alone)" - what a load of bull.

Bible is a message to us from God and using our free will we can
chose to either believe the message or not.

If we "choose" we go to heaven.
If we "choose" not we go to hell.
How is that a choice.
It seems more like a terrorist threat to me.


Well, if you chose not to believe the message then obviously you wouldn't
believe in hell. So what kind of threat are you talking about? How can you
be scared of something you don't even believe in? ;)

On a more serious note - not all who believe the message will be saved
and not all who reject it will be condemned. Faith alone or lack of it is not
enough to determine the outcome of the Judgement Day for an individual.

Actually, Catholic Church has never, ever, in an offcial document or book
stated that a particular person is in hell. Not even in the case of great
villains like Hitler or Stalin. We don't know who will be saved and who won't.
We can have some clues and suspicions but that's all. The final decision
is for God to make.
Bratwurst Boy  8 | 11927  
29 Jul 2009 /  #159
Well...he saved me the work! :)
But he surely overlooked alot...2000 years can be damned long when you are on the wrong end of the stick!

We don't know who will be saved and who won't.
We can have some clues and suspicions but that's all. The final decision
is for God to make.

That's nice!

Pagans even don't have that hassle...we don't need any "saving" at all...not being born sinners in the first place, isn't that much nicer!
Torq  
29 Jul 2009 /  #160
Pagans even don't have that hassle (...) not being born
sinners in the first place

Talking about pagans and being born - a newborn to be more precise. Pagans in Carthage
worshipped the demon Moloch and threw their newborn babies into furnaces to be burned
alive so it would bring Carthaginian merchants luck in their trade and commerce.

Are you the pagan of Carthaginian sort, BB, or do you belong to a different branch of
the same religion?

isn't that much nicer!

Oh, it is nice indeed to be devoid of sin like the pagans are (sarcasm).
Bratwurst Boy  8 | 11927  
29 Jul 2009 /  #161
Everything is better than what the Christian did in the name of their god Torqi....your tactic is not working.

The mass murder in the last centuries in the name of the christian god are uncomparable with anything the Pagans could ever do.
(Not to mention that 2000 years of christian brainwashing still left their traces on some weak minded)

And yes, it is a much nicer and much more natural way for a litttle baby to come into this world without being burdened by a mysterious sin it will have to repent for the whole life!

But to answer your question, my germanic ancestors had their own set of deities...but none of them to bow slavishly to.
A quite independent, free spirited lot my pagan ancestors where! :)
Torq  
29 Jul 2009 /  #162
Everything is better than what the Christian did in the name of their god Torqi

That's debatable - I'd say that what Nazis did in the name of their "master-race"
or what communists did in the name of their sick ideology is much worse.

your tactic is not working

It's not tactics - it called THE TRUTH.

litttle baby to come into this world without being burdened by a mysterious sin it will have to repent for the whole life!

:)

You really don't have a clue about Christanity, do you?

For your information, when the baby is baptized, which in Catholic Church happens
soon after the baby's born, the original sin (because I assume that's what you're
rumbling on about :)) is washed away.
Bratwurst Boy  8 | 11927  
29 Jul 2009 /  #163
That's debatable - I'd say that what Nazis did in the name of their "master-race"
or what communists did in the name of their sick ideology is much worse.

Well..the Wehrmacht marched with "Gott mit uns" on their beltbuckles.
Says everything, really...
And Communism was not really much different...they had their saints, their gods, their holy books, dissidents were killed...

You really don't have a clue about Christanity, do you?

More than I ever wanted...

Do you listen to yourself?
"washed away"...an "original sin" on a NEWBORN...that is just perverse! Both notions actually, that a human being is born with a sin and that said sin can be washed away...you are crazy!

But then, that is coming from the same people who get ordered around by God himself! :):):)
Torq  
29 Jul 2009 /  #164
"washed away"...an "original sin" on a NEWBORN...that is just perverse!

Not as perverse as throwing the same NEWBORN baby to be burned alive in a furnace
as your pagan brothers in Carthage used to do.
Bratwurst Boy  8 | 11927  
29 Jul 2009 /  #165
Do you have a link to that?

PS: You know that Paganism is no universal belief like Christianity, don't you?
Every people has their own, natural grown set of traditions, customs and beliefs...no claim of having the universal answer for everybody here!
Torq  
29 Jul 2009 /  #166
Do you have a link to that?

G.K. Chesterton in his book "Everlasting Man", in the chapter "The War of Gods and Demons," wrote:

In the New Town, which the Romans called Carthage, as in the parent cities of Phoenicia, the god who got things done bore the name of Moloch, who was perhaps identical with the other deity whom we know as Baal, the Lord. The Romans did not at first quite know what to call him or what to make of him; they had to go back to the grossest myth of Greek or Roman origins and compare him to Saturn devouring his children. But the worshippers of Moloch were not gross or primitive. They were members of a mature and polished civilisation, abounding in refinements and luxuries; they were probably far more civilised than the Romans. And Moloch was not a myth; or at any rate his meal was not a myth. These highly civilised people really met together to invoke the blessing of heaven on their empire by throwing hundreds of their infants into a large furnace.
We can only realise the combination by imagining a number of Manchester merchants with chimney-pot hats and mutton-chop whiskers, going to church every Sunday at eleven o'clock to see a baby roasted alive.

I will find you a link to the entire chapter of Chesterton's book in a moment...

EDIT:
Here it is...
worldinvisible.com/library/chesterton/everlasting/part1c7.htm

...and the whole book:

worldinvisible.com/library/chesterton/everlasting/content.htm

Great read, even if you're not a Christian.
Bratwurst Boy  8 | 11927  
29 Jul 2009 /  #167
I found also something about them: Quite uneuropean...no germanic tradition!

...
The gods Asherah, Baal, Molech and Ashteroth had also been a stumbling block for the Israelites, when they possessed the "promise land" east of the Jordan River, or Canaan. Ironically, they purged the Canaanites out, who practiced child sacrifice, and yet they too in time did the same thing.
...

forerunner.com/champion/nothing_new.html
Torq  
29 Jul 2009 /  #168
Quite uneuropean...no germanic tradition!

The Celtic and Northern German tribes - the ancestors of English and German speaking peoples - were barbaric, pagan idolaters who sacrificed their own children to the Mother Goddess. Child sacrifice and abortion were practiced and were accepted as facts of everyday life - the necessary consummation of rampant sexual immorality.

theforbiddenknowledge.com/hardtruth/child_sacrifices.htm

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Germanic_paganism
Bratwurst Boy  8 | 11927  
29 Jul 2009 /  #169
The first is the blatant and obnoxious try from right wing christian hardcore nutters to defame the rights of the women for abortions, just crap...no surprise here.

Child sacrifices were not common between the european pagans.

But the second...you bet! :)

PS: Did you actually read the article Torq? ROFL :):):)

...Wiccans are also encouraged to work their magic on the area surrounding the clinic: "Finally, many individuals and groups have been helping to magically (sic) protect the building and property ... This has been done by magical and psychic shielding being put on and around the property...."

SeanBM  34 | 5781  
29 Jul 2009 /  #170
Well, if you chose not to believe the message then obviously you wouldn't
believe in hell.

Children are indoctrinated into the religions because of where and when they were born, it is not a choice.

So what kind of threat are you talking about?

I am talking about the psychological terrorist threat of hell.

How can you
be scared of something you don't even believe in?

I don't believe in hell, well except for that place in Norway.

The final decision
is for God to make.

There is no God.

I did not before now, know that you were religious Torq.
Torq  
29 Jul 2009 /  #171
Children are indoctrinated into the religions because of where and when they were born, it is not a choice.

Not true. I wasn't raised a Catholic, but many of my friends who were brought up
in Catholic families strayed away from the Church and aren't Christians anymore.

There is no God.

That's what you believe. I believe that there is.

I did not before now, know that you were religious Torq.

Well, I am. I'm not only a Catholic, but also a traditional, conservative Catholic.
The Radio Maryja family are a bunch of liberals and modernists compared to me :)
Bratwurst Boy  8 | 11927  
29 Jul 2009 /  #172
The Radio Maryja family are a bunch of liberals and modernists compared to me :)

Oh boy...and you seemed to be such a nice chap!
SeanBM  34 | 5781  
29 Jul 2009 /  #173
Not true. I wasn't raised a Catholic

You were not raised a Catholic but you are now?.
That is unusual, what were you raised?.

I believe that there is.

Why?.

The Radio Maryja family are a bunch of liberals and modernists compared to me

But I bet you don't get half the funding Rydzyk gets? ;)
Torq  
29 Jul 2009 /  #174
Oh boy...and you seemed to be such a nice chap!

Hey - I am a nice chap! (not to the baby burning pagans though ;))

You were not raised a Catholic but you are now?.

Yes.

That is unusual, what were you raised?

I was raised a free man, able to make my own choice when it comes to religion.

Why?

If I said that "I know that there is God" then you could ask me "Why?".
I said that I believe - it is faith not knowledge that we're talking about.
As for my personal reasons, they are personal so I'd rather keep them
to myself.

But I bet you don't get half the funding Rydzyk gets? ;)

That's true :(
Bratwurst Boy  8 | 11927  
29 Jul 2009 /  #175
I said that I believe - it is faith not knowledge that we're talking about.

That is fine!
It's the "god gave us...,"god told me so...","god promised us..."part where most have difficulties with.
Especially when it comes to policies which influence millions of lives.

Man I brought the thread back on topic!!! *applauds himself*
Torq  
29 Jul 2009 /  #176
Man I brought the thread back on topic!!! *applauds himself*

It's good to have at least one member who reminds us that
there's supposed to be die ordnung in threads ;)
SeanBM  34 | 5781  
29 Jul 2009 /  #177
I was raised a free man, able to make my own choice when it comes to religion.

Where were you raised a free man?.
Wouldn't have been good old Poland, would it?, sure that is only 90% Catholic.

Or do you think you would have converted to Catholicism if you were brought up in Canada 3000 years ago?.
Torq  
29 Jul 2009 /  #178
Where were you raised a free man? Wouldn't have been good old Poland, would it?

I was raised in Poland and spent most of my life here. My Father was into the hippie
movement in the 70's (it was funny as feck to see those old photos of the old man
with long hair, wearing flowers in his hair :)), he was never much into religion and
my Mum was always influenced by him, so I wasn't raised in a religious family
(not counting my grandmother who first prayed and the put curses on my old man
on numerous occasions :)).

My Parents never forced me to do anything and they raised me a free man, allowing
me to make my own choice about religion. This is exaclty how I am going to raise
my kids. If they choose to be Catholics, I'll be very happy, if they don't - I won't
mind.

Or do you think you would have converted to Catholicism if you were brought up in Canada 3000 years ago?

I'm a very down to earth, sensible man - not much into asking myself questions like
"If elephants were pink and could fly, would they fly higher or lower than sparrows".
SeanBM  34 | 5781  
29 Jul 2009 /  #179
This is exaclty how I am going to raise
my kids. If they choose to be Catholics, I'll be very happy, if they don't - I won't
mind.

I think this is a good idea.
I have a few friends who had agnostic or atheist parents, funny thing is they get very curious about religion.

I'm a very down to earth, sensible man

I said that I believe - it is faith not knowledge that we're talking about.

Sometimes, after all you do believe in a God.

And that example of the elephants and sparrows was not very persuasive or even on target.
Torq  
29 Jul 2009 /  #180
Sometimes, after all you do believe in a God.

I didn't experience any kind of revelation like a burning bush or anything like that.
I reached my faith through lecture and contemplation and also cetrain personal
experience but, as I said, it's very personal to me and I'm not willing to share it
on a public forum.

example of the elephants and sparrows was not very persuasive or even on target

Probably not, but you know what I meant.

I would only like to notice that the thread is being dragged off-topic again (not by me ;))

Archives - 2005-2009 / News / New York Post : "Polish" Death Camps and moreArchived