Ahhh so sayeth, Lord Liberal! We are prostrate at your wisdom. Clowns we are compared to you all Knowing One!
Ah, but I'm not the one who's holy, or even all knowing. I'm not the one who speaks for, and acts on behalf of a God. (No who's holy and all knowing?) In fact, I do realize that I'm not better than any of you. I'm not the one who calls someone else immoral either, I'm simply making comparissons, and hope he might acknowledge the hypocrisy of it all, before insulting someone else for being who he or she is.
My point is, our whole way of life, and the system it's based on, could be considered as immoral just aswell. No one is infallible, and all of us can be immoral sometimes, in one way or another. The fact some people don't seem to be aware of that in the first place, is what I would call ignorance of the worst kind. (To actually believe you can do no wrong in the bigger picture, or to deny your own responsibility in the bigger picture!) With arrogance I mean that some people seem to think they have the God-given right to call someone else immoral, and to base such verdicts solely on someone's nature.
One's (Wether he or she is straight, gay or lesbian!) morality or sense of values doesn't have a god-damn thing to do with one's sexual nature.
Holy? I think that's a misconception, because if someone opposes religion here, then that would be me. Because I can accept the fact that I can be immoral sometimes, because I can accept the fact that I am human, and I oppose this self-righteousness, because no God ever told me wrong from right.. Who the hell is he to tell other people that they are suffering from an immoral disease?
So it's actually him who claims to know everything. Not me. He's the one who's speaking on behalf of a God. Not me. It's actually fine with me if you want to say something about me, or question my point of vieuw, or question my motives, or question whatever you wish to question about me, but atleast get it straight when you do.
I guess we will never understand eachother if we don't exchange our vieuws. Look, I'm not the personification of all that is righteous, and I'm sure as hell not trying to portray myself as the embodiment of enlightenment. I'm just speaking my mind, and I strongly oppose this medieval way of thinking.
But if you think you have better suggestions, or better explanations, then by all means, go ahead and speak your mind.
:)
Gays + Lesbians = Are people :) ... they are humans ... they need love and respect... they need tolerance... they need equal rights as we have....
It is an UNSOCIAL, ANTI-NATURE, ANTI-PRODUCTIVE and very IMMORAL diesease.
How on earth could anyone call the above an example of love, respect, tolerance, or even a motivation for equality I wonder?
They will never be seen as equal, and they will never be respected for who they are, for as long as you keep accusing them of anti-social or unnatural behaviour, or even associate their sexual nature with a disease. Really, I can't help but noticing how you contradict yourself, and I can't help but thinking it's hypocrisy at its worst to claim that you're somehow morally correct, and have a better understanding of moral values, just because you happen to be a heterosexual.
:(
Or am I missing something here?