Return PolishForums LIVE
  PolishForums Archive :
Archives - 2005-2009 / History  % width 243

Poland Betrayed in WW2


Harry  
29 Jan 2008 /  #121
The poster I was replying to has previously posted this particular lie. I politely asked her not to repeat it and gave her a link to the correct information. She still posts the same tired old lie. I'm tired of her doing that.

If you're cyber-stalking me, you might want to take a look in the mirror and ask yourself a few searching questions.
southern 73 | 7071  
29 Jan 2008 /  #122
Harry is right in this regard.If I have understood correctly feminism means equal treatment.
isthatu 3 | 1164  
29 Jan 2008 /  #123
Here here,stop squwaking for equality then claiming special rightts if some man happens to treat you equaly, does an in justice to the womens struggle as much as a chubby ginger english mut in a low cut union jack dress does.
joo who - | 100  
29 Jan 2008 /  #124
you might want to take a look in the mirror

..thankyou, just did...as beautiful as ever! Damn....how can a girl be so blessed! Is that the polite advice you were referring to? It's the only advice you've offered...but it was well worth following!

P.S I don't want equality...how can a mere man be my equal???
isthatu 3 | 1164  
29 Jan 2008 /  #125
P.S I don't want equality...how can a mere man be my equal???

LMAO,nice one :)
joo who - | 100  
29 Jan 2008 /  #126
Thankyou, Isthatu! You are a gentleman of the highest order, and I graciously accept your glowing compliment! :0)

(Anyone know what LMAO means??? Please?? Help! Dumb damsel in distress!)
z_darius 14 | 3960  
29 Jan 2008 /  #127
OK, enough smiles. Let's get back to more serious matters. I'm taking this place over ;)


Patrycja19 62 | 2683  
29 Jan 2008 /  #128
I do not think they are debatable for the people who found jobs and enjoyed the benefits of economic growth.

agree, we had a hard time for a while.. this was our comeback. something had to
be done.

Whatever English or Americans did,Poland would fall in soviet hands.There was no way to avoid it.

I am still in agreement..
El Gato 4 | 351  
29 Jan 2008 /  #129
Dumb damsel in distress

You're right. None of us can equal that...

:]
the_falkster 1 | 180  
30 Jan 2008 /  #130
Anyone know what LMAO means???

Laughing My Backside Off ...
that's how i understand it...
Michal - | 1865  
30 Jan 2008 /  #131
Do people feel that Poland was betrayed in WW2 by its Allies? Did they have an obligation to Poland?

personally, I do not think that Poland was betrayed. Britian started a war with Germany over Poland and it was a European war contained within Europe. By the time Japan attacked the Americans in Purl Harbour and Hitler attacked Russia it became a World war. Churchill had very little real influence in my opinion towards the wend of the war as the two major players were America and Russia.
z_darius 14 | 3960  
30 Jan 2008 /  #132
By the time Japan attacked the Americans in Purl Harbour

Japan never attacked Purl Harbour. I'm not even sure Purl Harbour even existed in 1941.
celinski 31 | 1258  
30 Jan 2008 /  #133
Purl Harbour even existed in 1941.

Pearl Harbor was attacked Dec 7,1941

"At 6:00 a.m. on 7 December, the six Japanese carriers launched a first wave of 181 planes composed of torpedo bombers, dive bombers, horizontal bombers and fighters. Even as they winged south, some elements of U.S. forces on Oahu realized there was something different about this Sunday morning."

history.navy.mil/faqs/faq66-1.htm
db1874 7 | 227  
30 Jan 2008 /  #134
Japan never attacked Purl Harbour. I'm not even sure Purl Harbour even existed in 1941

Japanese attack on Pearl Harbour
z_darius 14 | 3960  
30 Jan 2008 /  #135
Pearl Harbor was attacked Dec 7,1941

So?
celinski 31 | 1258  
30 Jan 2008 /  #136
Japan never attacked Purl Harbour. I'm not even sure Purl Harbour even existed in 1941.

You stated they never attacked Pearl Harbor or it existed in 1941.
z_darius 14 | 3960  
30 Jan 2008 /  #137
I never stated that.
celinski 31 | 1258  
30 Jan 2008 /  #138
I was looking at message # 132.
southern 73 | 7071  
30 Jan 2008 /  #139
It was ironic.Purl harbour vs Pearl harbor.
celinski 31 | 1258  
30 Jan 2008 /  #140
Purl harbour vs Pearl harbor.

LOL Thought this might be the issue, Z-darius sound spell, it works. Another point worth bring up is Pres. Roosevelt was very ill and died soon after, Truman took over and had our hands full with Germany.
southern 73 | 7071  
30 Jan 2008 /  #141
Pres. Roosevelt was very ill and died soon after, Truman took over and had our hands full with Germany.

Truman was Hitler's last hope.He took office 8 days before Hitler commited suicide.
z_darius 14 | 3960  
30 Jan 2008 /  #142
Z-darius sound spell, it works.

It does. But noblesse obliges and the fact remains that Japan never attacked any clothing manufacturers in Australia
celinski 31 | 1258  
30 Jan 2008 /  #143
fact remains that Japan never attacked any clothing manufacturers

This helps.
Michal - | 1865  
30 Jan 2008 /  #144
Japan never attacked Purl Harbour.

Japan did indeed attack Purl Harbour with aircraft that left aircraft carriers.
celinski 31 | 1258  
30 Jan 2008 /  #145
You are right this did happen. Z-darius was referring to the spellingPurl vs Pearl. Nothing better to do I guess.
z_darius 14 | 3960  
30 Jan 2008 /  #146
Japan did indeed attack Purl Harbour with aircraft that left aircraft carriers.

Can you provide us with a half a somewhat reputable link confirming that?
Avalon 4 | 1066  
30 Jan 2008 /  #147
They could hardly have attacked if they had stayed on the aircraft carriers.....lol
Michal - | 1865  
30 Jan 2008 /  #148
have attacked if they had stayed on the aircraft carriers.....lol

Maybe the aircraft carriers were also submarines?
szarlotka 8 | 2205  
30 Jan 2008 /  #149
Fiendish those Japanese
southern 73 | 7071  
30 Jan 2008 /  #150
Maybe the aircraft carriers were also submarines?

Yes,they held the aircrafts under water with the pilots inside.

Archives - 2005-2009 / History / Poland Betrayed in WW2Archived