Poland Betrayed in WW2

The poster I was replying to has previously posted this particular lie. I politely asked her not to repeat it and gave her a link to the correct information. She still posts the same tired old lie. I'm tired of her doing that.

If you're cyber-stalking me, you might want to take a look in the mirror and ask yourself a few searching questions.

Harry is right in this regard.If I have understood correctly feminism means equal treatment.

Here here,stop squwaking for equality then claiming special rightts if some man happens to treat you equaly, does an in justice to the womens struggle as much as a chubby ginger english mut in a low cut union jack dress does.

..thankyou, just did...as beautiful as ever! Damn....how can a girl be so blessed! Is that the polite advice you were referring to? It's the only advice you've offered...but it was well worth following!

P.S I don't want equality...how can a mere man be my equal???

LMAO,nice one :)

Thankyou, Isthatu! You are a gentleman of the highest order, and I graciously accept your glowing compliment! :0)

(Anyone know what LMAO means??? Please?? Help! Dumb damsel in distress!)

OK, enough smiles. Let's get back to more serious matters. I'm taking this place over ;)

agree, we had a hard time for a while.. this was our comeback. something had to
be done.


I am still in agreement..

You're right. None of us can equal that...

:]

Laughing My Backside Off ...
that's how i understand it...

personally, I do not think that Poland was betrayed. Britian started a war with Germany over Poland and it was a European war contained within Europe. By the time Japan attacked the Americans in Purl Harbour and Hitler attacked Russia it became a World war. Churchill had very little real influence in my opinion towards the wend of the war as the two major players were America and Russia.

Japan never attacked Purl Harbour. I'm not even sure Purl Harbour even existed in 1941.

Pearl Harbor was attacked Dec 7,1941

"At 6:00 a.m. on 7 December, the six Japanese carriers launched a first wave of 181 planes composed of torpedo bombers, dive bombers, horizontal bombers and fighters. Even as they winged south, some elements of U.S. forces on Oahu realized there was something different about this Sunday morning."

history.navy.mil/faqs/faq66-1.htm

Japanese attack on Pearl Harbour

So?

You stated they never attacked Pearl Harbor or it existed in 1941.

I never stated that.

I was looking at message # 132.

It was ironic.Purl harbour vs Pearl harbor.

LOL Thought this might be the issue, Z-darius sound spell, it works. Another point worth bring up is Pres. Roosevelt was very ill and died soon after, Truman took over and had our hands full with Germany.

Truman was Hitler's last hope.He took office 8 days before Hitler commited suicide.

It does. But noblesse obliges and the fact remains that Japan never attacked any clothing manufacturers in Australia

This helps.

Japan did indeed attack Purl Harbour with aircraft that left aircraft carriers.

You are right this did happen. Z-darius was referring to the spellingPurl vs Pearl. Nothing better to do I guess.

Can you provide us with a half a somewhat reputable link confirming that?

They could hardly have attacked if they had stayed on the aircraft carriers.....lol

Maybe the aircraft carriers were also submarines?

Fiendish those Japanese

Yes,they held the aircrafts under water with the pilots inside.