FIRST POL-AM CATHOLIC (?) PRIESTESS

Some may try ! but it is impossible to stop the wheels of progress !

I think I understand what you are trying to say, it is quite interesting possibly not very practical?.
I don't know the full extent to which only knowing one's mind but then again maybe it is like that signature thingy on my posts,

"Know thyself, to understand oneself is to understand other humans"


This is a discussion, join in if you will but just telling people to loosen up is not very constructive.
Perhaps expand upon what you would like to say?.
Just a thought.


I agree to an extent but we must be careful that we do not create something else of equal fictitious value to replace it, as we have done so many many times before.

Yes we can see that by your comments such as...


You can pray wherever you please, its not the same thing as going to church. If you already have admitted to not knowing the religion, then please stop posting your inaccuracies. I'm not here to teach you, or keep arguing how a real devoted Catholic practices. You seem more raced on your mother than the topic. Your mother is not the topic in the thread. I didnt call her a lesbian. Maybe your kosher azz should re-read what I posted. (I'm not sure where you are in "america" but that slang must be in your ghetto hood)

ok.. again, the original topic is about.. first pol-am catholic..

and I think that it would be a better option then the pedofiles <~facts
that are serving in the church now..

theres far to many MALE PEDOFILES.. making things bad for the Catholic religion
they change to suit..

tell us oh catholic one.. tell us something good about the catholic religion and how good it is so we may join this following and become good catholics like you are.. give us some type of hope oh expert of chicago :)

I for one would love to hear more.. lets hear your views..

or would you still want to cont attacking?

I would love to hear more from eurola..

I asked PF members for 10 Catholic beliefs that would separate it from Protestant ones. They couldn't do it. It tells a story really. Oh, it's about belief in God they said. Well, Protestants believe in God too, hence the term Christianity. How can we possibly enter into theological debates when the fundamentals seem to be so elusive?

In Poland I went to a place for christmas with a friend and we went to a pub during our stay and some guy tried to tell me I didnt know anything about christmas because I was a protestant. Funny. In a class I told them most of Americans are protestant and they asked if we had our own churches. Very funny stuff to me!

I did not see that but i am not surprised, even when they have google infront of them, they still don't know what to research.


Part of the con is that nobody knows and you are programmed not to ask questions.
It is a matter of "blind faith" (the absolute belief in something with no evidence), put your blinkers on and keep your head down, you are in the presence of the ultimate big brother.

But my point is nothing to do with Protestant or Catholic or Muslims or Jews but with god itself, which has to do with all religions.

I know I have come across quite dogmatic on this thread but that was because I did not want people to misunderstand my view.
I have spent a lot of time contemplating and researching this, I do not write these words lightly.

I would like to continue to discuss this topic but as before only if we can remain civilised.

Well, being agnostic or atheist is a fair position to adopt in the absence of irrefutable evidence to the contrary (i.e that God exists). Agnostic especially as being unsure seems to fit with the evidence. The question there is 'to what level are you unsure?'.

Sean call me stupid but i really dont understand the big difference between the two and the reasons for so much hostility, perhaps you could list it here in lamens terms for me and all the rest.

I agree, I don't really see major differences in a real sense. In the words of a Cockney, 'wot's 'at abowwwt, then?'

it is not just irrefutable but there is no evidence, god even as a theory is a lame one.


I was agnostic for many years not any more and there is no evidence, none, zero, zip.
Atheism therefore fits the evidence.


I am as unsure as you are that the God Thor does not create lightning.
(I am assuming you are not delusional).
Remember all the myths of today were once religions, now we look at Zeus, Isis and Thor as fictional characters.

Assuming I'm not delusional, bad assumption, LOL

At least you have avoided too much presumption :)