you're mixing two concepts.
Love doesn't require sex, neither does sex require love. I was writing about biology, not about a concept called love, which btw, according to a saying I heard somewhere, [love] is a trick nature plays on us to ensure perpetuation of the species. That "rule", obviously, doesn't apply to gays ;)
Actually, in RCC it does make sense. According to the doctrine, extramarital sex is not legit. Gays can;t get married, ergo their sex is by definition illegal in RCC.
I see your points, but this is gonna start getting silly soon. And i wouldnt say its me mixing concepts, the question i think was "is being gay the norm?"
If 'Gays' cannot get married, then there is, in effect, no such thing as extra-marrital anything for them.
It will bring us back to Religion again, and i'm getting dizzy from all these circles we're running in!