But it seems as if lines are being drawn, those lines are constantly changing, so how do we know who is who and what is what?
I was referring to how other people have handled the replies in this thread and it was a generalization on my part. Perhaps even laziness since I have clear views on race in general and everybody is equal to me. I can dislike somebody for their personality but never for the race because it is a theoretical concept. I rather reffer to people based on teir culture they grew up in, including thei rpersonal stories but never on their race.
On the one hand you have aparthide and on the other you have reverse racism
I would not call this a revrse racism, but giving the opportunity to those who didn't have it in the past. We had some examples of that in Canada in the 80 when multiculturalism had to be implemented with the laws and the so called "reversed racism" came into play in hiring practices.
Also you have to kinda look at who you are letting in, refugees are refugees, (some are not but the screening policy needs to be tightened.
Yes and No. it really depends on the individual case. The truth is that when admitting refugees into the coutry, it is really hard to prove if their stories of abuse are true. I am not sure how it is done in Ireland, but I know that in Canada it is really hard to prove the thread if the country of origin is not violating the human rights of their citizens. Canada actually has a profile including the political situation in regards to human rights abuse and bases the entrances on those guidelines.
know Sweden lets lots of refugees live there who would otherwise probably be hunted down and murdered, they are not right in the head after what they have been through.
I am not familiar with their guideliness therefore I am not going to comment on that issue.
But no one wants to be a minority in their own country, labelled racist if they show pride in their traditions and nation.
showing pride has nothing to do with RACSIM.
It is a tight rope.
I don't think it is. It takes objectivity to resolve those issues and most people who are not in the field have partial info on how the immigrants effect their countries.
I would jus tlike to point out that there are several reasons for bringing the immigants into the country and one major one is a bug supply of cheap labour. If the labours want to have more than just work, but also life, which involves being part of the community , they need to feel welcomed, not being treaed like second category citizens.
" considering we are a nation of refugees, 3.5 million irish in Ireland 70 million Irish in the world,
I agree, but most Irish feel like part of the community they immigrated to, however it took a while to establish where they are now. They are an important make up of those countries. They would understand, but those who never immigrated cannot relate to immigrants and take an easy way out by saying that immigrants are to blame. It is an example of a scapegot situation.
i live in a city with more than 50% immigrant population and perhaps I am not really threatened by it. Actually, I am very OK witih it. Why wouldn't I be. Canada took me in as well.
Well, it is time to go out and experiance some more multiculturalism. The summer is here.