Crnogorac
7 Jul 2008
News / March of Tolerance in Krakow [478]
I agree completely with the stance about the connection between homosexuality and pedophilia. However, here I would write some word regarding "arguments" with which it is tried to "defend" homosexuality and generally "the right of choice of sexual orientation".
1. they were born like that
That is very probable. At least for the majority of them. And if they were born this way then that is a disorder which should be treated. In supplement to this state those researches where the first **** discovered physiological reasons for homosexuality (in truth, with fruit flies) but principle is the same.
sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/12/071210094541.htm
So there is hope for those who are aware of their sickness and are persistent to suppress it. However, in the same way in recent time "coquetry" with homosexuality became it's very own trend. It became "in" particularly in the West. It is sufficient to view only numerous Hollywood series and films in which homos and lesbos are ordinarily displayed in positive light and as something entirely normal. Furthermore they are portrayed as "more advanced" and customarily "more intelligent" then heterosexuals. And as such more desirable. That says enough about the strength of their lobby in Hollywood. And under the influence of media also many young people who would wish to be "in", begin to experiment with that disgusting conduct.
From another side homosexual circles do not wish even to hear that their sorrowful state is a sickness. In that they have received backing, except for the media, also of the healthcare lobby, so that the American association of psychiatrists homosexuality removed from the list of diseases and disorders in behavior. As if some decree can change anything in reality unnatural, unproductive, and to normal people disgusting conduct with the stroke of a pen turn into normal.
But homosexuals frequently sit on two chairs. From one side "they were born that way" and from the other entirely contradictory they affirm "it's the right of choice of sexual orientation". Those two assertions invalidate one another and provide to their protagonists the right in every discussion. Because, whatever you say they will have a counterargument. But even that isn't enough for them. In recent time they are forcing the thesis that "overall there is no problem in the nature of homosexuality (if it is a sickness or not) instead in the "perception of society in regards to them". Therefore they aren't the problem. Problem are 90% "bigoted, backward and intolerant neanderthals" who are "wrongly perceiving them". Meaning, the homos and lesbos aren't the ones who need to corrugate themselves instead the remainder of society. And that is the climax of cynicism, hypocrisy and effrontery of those freaks.
2. they are committing evil to nobody, because everything is done in agreement of both persons
Often are pedophile relations known to be carried out under the apparition of "agreement" when one person (grown up) without the use of physical force, with other forms of pressure and deceit entices a child to sexual relations. And sado-mazo relations which are known to leave heavy medical consequences, even leads in some cases to death are in the same way agreed relations. Is it therefore normal and desirable? Even more drastic is the recent case of two men from Germany when one of them with (even written) permission of the other (who was apparently very ill) killed him, cooked and ate. Is that acceptable behavior only because in question was an agreement? And mutual agreement is also the relation of prostitutes (female and male) with clients. Does that mean that prostitution should be viewed as desirable and normal? And numerous homosexual rapes and pedophilia which is noticeably more widespread precisely among them in no case are agreed relations, but are a consequence of homosexual behavior.
3. even in nature there is such behavior
That which in nature is called homosexuality is in fact bisexuality. Individual units of a strong gender with sexual lust simply assert themselves over everything in order, male and female. Shortly, they are showing it in every hole, even the one on the ground.
Similar is the occurrence in prisons where individuals of strong lust but weak moral and intellect in insufficiency of the opposite gender practice homosexuality. However, exclusive homosexuality as a manner of behavior does not exist in nature. Except for that in nature exist another forms of sexual occurrences like hermaphrodites. Should we also declare that as normal amongst humans?
4. sexuality is an individual's private matter
I apologize because of these disgusting pictures. Especially to those with weaker stomachs, but is this individual or private:
These disgusting sights are everyday spectacles in western cities, and even now slowly in ours if we do not come to our senses. These are the renowned "gay-pride" parades. What are they so much proud of? And where is there the individuality and the privacy when these types of perversions and distortions aggressively and imposingly (and under the protection of "law enforcement") are showing on streets where there are young children which these kinds of sights could traumatize for their whole life. And again I say, homosexual rapes, adolescent prostitution, enticement of the young and the naïve on this sin in no way are individual matter. Neither is the persistent homo promotion in the media.
5. in ancient Greece they loved young "boys"...
Exactly the term "pederasty" carries it's root from ancient Greece. The term pederasty (greek) comes from the word paid - boy & eros - to love and in the wider context signifies love between a grown up man and adolescent. This undoubtedly proves that homosexuality is inseparably and narrowly bound to precisely pedophilia. From the other side gays emphasize how in ancient Greece they equally appreciated the beauty of a woman and young boys (again pedophilia) which isn't correct. Because the beauty of a man's body (athletically developed) was mainly viewed from the artistic sense and not erotic, as is the case with women. Of course the opposite counts, if we would observe from the women's standing (men - erotic interest, women - aesthetic).
Of course also in antique Greece there were homos and lesbos, but it isn't true that was there considered acceptable behavior. That is a claim which the homosexual lobbies are attempting to launch together with that almost every significant historical figure was a queer. All together of course with intent not to win some sort of "equality" with normal people, instead precisely the opposite. Privileged position. So-called "positive discrimination".
I agree completely with the stance about the connection between homosexuality and pedophilia. However, here I would write some word regarding "arguments" with which it is tried to "defend" homosexuality and generally "the right of choice of sexual orientation".
1. they were born like that
That is very probable. At least for the majority of them. And if they were born this way then that is a disorder which should be treated. In supplement to this state those researches where the first **** discovered physiological reasons for homosexuality (in truth, with fruit flies) but principle is the same.
sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/12/071210094541.htm
So there is hope for those who are aware of their sickness and are persistent to suppress it. However, in the same way in recent time "coquetry" with homosexuality became it's very own trend. It became "in" particularly in the West. It is sufficient to view only numerous Hollywood series and films in which homos and lesbos are ordinarily displayed in positive light and as something entirely normal. Furthermore they are portrayed as "more advanced" and customarily "more intelligent" then heterosexuals. And as such more desirable. That says enough about the strength of their lobby in Hollywood. And under the influence of media also many young people who would wish to be "in", begin to experiment with that disgusting conduct.
From another side homosexual circles do not wish even to hear that their sorrowful state is a sickness. In that they have received backing, except for the media, also of the healthcare lobby, so that the American association of psychiatrists homosexuality removed from the list of diseases and disorders in behavior. As if some decree can change anything in reality unnatural, unproductive, and to normal people disgusting conduct with the stroke of a pen turn into normal.
But homosexuals frequently sit on two chairs. From one side "they were born that way" and from the other entirely contradictory they affirm "it's the right of choice of sexual orientation". Those two assertions invalidate one another and provide to their protagonists the right in every discussion. Because, whatever you say they will have a counterargument. But even that isn't enough for them. In recent time they are forcing the thesis that "overall there is no problem in the nature of homosexuality (if it is a sickness or not) instead in the "perception of society in regards to them". Therefore they aren't the problem. Problem are 90% "bigoted, backward and intolerant neanderthals" who are "wrongly perceiving them". Meaning, the homos and lesbos aren't the ones who need to corrugate themselves instead the remainder of society. And that is the climax of cynicism, hypocrisy and effrontery of those freaks.
2. they are committing evil to nobody, because everything is done in agreement of both persons
Often are pedophile relations known to be carried out under the apparition of "agreement" when one person (grown up) without the use of physical force, with other forms of pressure and deceit entices a child to sexual relations. And sado-mazo relations which are known to leave heavy medical consequences, even leads in some cases to death are in the same way agreed relations. Is it therefore normal and desirable? Even more drastic is the recent case of two men from Germany when one of them with (even written) permission of the other (who was apparently very ill) killed him, cooked and ate. Is that acceptable behavior only because in question was an agreement? And mutual agreement is also the relation of prostitutes (female and male) with clients. Does that mean that prostitution should be viewed as desirable and normal? And numerous homosexual rapes and pedophilia which is noticeably more widespread precisely among them in no case are agreed relations, but are a consequence of homosexual behavior.
3. even in nature there is such behavior
That which in nature is called homosexuality is in fact bisexuality. Individual units of a strong gender with sexual lust simply assert themselves over everything in order, male and female. Shortly, they are showing it in every hole, even the one on the ground.
Similar is the occurrence in prisons where individuals of strong lust but weak moral and intellect in insufficiency of the opposite gender practice homosexuality. However, exclusive homosexuality as a manner of behavior does not exist in nature. Except for that in nature exist another forms of sexual occurrences like hermaphrodites. Should we also declare that as normal amongst humans?
4. sexuality is an individual's private matter
I apologize because of these disgusting pictures. Especially to those with weaker stomachs, but is this individual or private:
These disgusting sights are everyday spectacles in western cities, and even now slowly in ours if we do not come to our senses. These are the renowned "gay-pride" parades. What are they so much proud of? And where is there the individuality and the privacy when these types of perversions and distortions aggressively and imposingly (and under the protection of "law enforcement") are showing on streets where there are young children which these kinds of sights could traumatize for their whole life. And again I say, homosexual rapes, adolescent prostitution, enticement of the young and the naïve on this sin in no way are individual matter. Neither is the persistent homo promotion in the media.
5. in ancient Greece they loved young "boys"...
Exactly the term "pederasty" carries it's root from ancient Greece. The term pederasty (greek) comes from the word paid - boy & eros - to love and in the wider context signifies love between a grown up man and adolescent. This undoubtedly proves that homosexuality is inseparably and narrowly bound to precisely pedophilia. From the other side gays emphasize how in ancient Greece they equally appreciated the beauty of a woman and young boys (again pedophilia) which isn't correct. Because the beauty of a man's body (athletically developed) was mainly viewed from the artistic sense and not erotic, as is the case with women. Of course the opposite counts, if we would observe from the women's standing (men - erotic interest, women - aesthetic).
Of course also in antique Greece there were homos and lesbos, but it isn't true that was there considered acceptable behavior. That is a claim which the homosexual lobbies are attempting to launch together with that almost every significant historical figure was a queer. All together of course with intent not to win some sort of "equality" with normal people, instead precisely the opposite. Privileged position. So-called "positive discrimination".
