History /
Should Germany claim to be the victims in Poland? [510]
In Dresden there was no military target at all.Only refugees from Pommern,etc.After
- You seem conveniently to forget that Germany was the bad guys in the war. They started a cruel aggressive war, defied the Allied armies rabidly (the Allies were actually the good guys) and spread destruction. Germany was the rabid dog of the war and there was no other choice but treat Germany as such. In order to kill an aggressive rabid dog at large you must shoot it down as soon as possible. You shoot at any part of its body; you've got no time to avoid shooting at this or that part of the body in order not to damage the fur. Carpet-bombing Dresden and other German cities was, first of all, effectual (spread panic amongst the fanatic Hitlerite population - the vast majority of Germans were so), and second was the German own strategy used in Warsaw, London, Belgrade. They got theirs at last. The so-called revisionists now try depict the Germans as either the good guys of WWII (who wanted to finish off communism - hehehe!), or at least as good as or equal to the Allies. Of course, many Germans and Germanophiles seem to like this, but what they like is a falsification of historical truth, I dare think.
In his book Speer calls the bombing
- So the top Nazi war criminal, Albert Speer, is your authority, southern...?
:)
The scum who ran eastern europe for years were "morraly bankrupt" as you speak. Far worse then the germans you slam
- Where did you take it from that the commies in 'eastern europe' (sic) were 'far worse' than the Germans under Hitler? From some neo-Nazi leaflet? In reality, the commies and Nazis were equally bad, both being left-wing fascists.
I haven't noticed isthatu ever slamming the Germans; I've noticed him giving facts about them. Unlike yourself, isthatu is a knowledgeable and eloquent man, so, well, you shouldn't speak arrogantly but humbly to him.
:)
