PolishForums LIVE  /  Archives [3]    
 
Posts by Sokrates  

Joined: 19 Jan 2009 / Male ♂
Last Post: 1 Oct 2011
Threads: Total: 8 / In This Archive: 1
Posts: Total: 3335 / In This Archive: 1407
From: Poland
Speaks Polish?: Yes
Interests: Many and varied.

Displayed posts: 1408 / page 46 of 47
sort: Latest first   Oldest first   |
Sokrates   
13 Feb 2009
News / Poland..wake up to a multicultural world [1059]

you dont have the vaguest idea what multicultural society can truely give you

After four months in London i do and i dont like it, black neighbourhoods are virtually as a rule criminal infested s--holes for example.

Here in Poland we do have crime and poor neighbourhoods but we dont have slums in the traditional sense, imagine my shock when i bumped into them in real life and found out that slums are mostly black or muslim.

The level of culture of black people in UK is staggering, my friend adequately called them "fucking apes" and dont get out with liberal rubbish about how "not every black..." i know but for every black that actually behaved like a human being there was a dozen spitting cussing rude bastards, also whats with blacks and asking for change ?

Muslims ? Apply everything above but to a lesser degree and add their little barbaric cult which they try to force down the british throats taking advantage of the fact that brits got castrated with political correctness.

I'll stay with white monocultural Poland thank you.

Also please tell me, what exactly can a multicultural society give me that my mono-cultural Poland cant ?
Sokrates   
13 Feb 2009
News / Poland..wake up to a multicultural world [1059]

For one thing so that I can get a decent curry no matter where I am

Harry i've been to UK, it would be a great place sans muslims and blacks, scream racism all you want but the fact is that we should allow migrations from Europe only, multiracial or cultural society sucks anal orifice.

I have nothing against us opening our borders to Belariussians or Ukrainians, they're the same cultural circle even if they're dirt poor, they'll be at home in London or Warsaw and they'll assimilate faster than you can spell "cheap labour" but muslims and blacks are another thing entirely.

Yes they make for a colorfull society but the cons of having black slums and dealing with barbaric culture of Islam is a con that overrides me being able to see how good a screw a black chick is.

Also if you're living in Poland you should know by now we have stuff thats a LOT better than curry.
Sokrates   
13 Feb 2009
News / Poland..wake up to a multicultural world [1059]

What can i say, being a bigot is fun. Howeverrrr lets face it, ingesting so many ethnicities is not healthy, everything should have its limits including diversity, personally i enjoy monocultural white Poland.
Sokrates   
13 Feb 2009
Love / Polish women are known for their beauty, but men are so ugly (most of).. [250]

Do you know many English women? I've sat next to a fair few not so "fresh" ratty Polish men of late, Im not going to generalise that all Polish men are a bit trampish, smelly and ratty though.

Rubbish! Nationality defines attractivness, polish women are divine and polish men are fugly, except me.
Sokrates   
13 Feb 2009
News / Poland..wake up to a multicultural world [1059]

Hmm this thread has merit, first we should buy some blacks from a nearby slave market, then we should take away our womens rights and start opressing other religions that would attract muslims.

Once we attract some muslims we'll round em up and shoot them, that will attract some Jews.

In time we will be a nice multicultural s--hole where you cant spell Allah without having your your throat slit by immigrant rednecks! Joy oh joy ...
Sokrates   
13 Feb 2009
Love / Love my polish girlfriend alot but under pressure from family [166]

Why should you have your desired monoculturalism and then also extract money from the UK and send it home?

Because you let us.

@InlovewithPoland.

You could honor murder the girl, you could blow yourself up in an act of protest orrrrrrrrrr you could stop being a little twat hiding behind his so called culture and be honest, pick what you want, your daddys goat herding business or your girl as the woman of your life.

Once you pick what you want act on it.
Sokrates   
13 Feb 2009
Love / About Personal Problems (English / Polish relationships) [32]

Does anyone wonder if some people have taken our advice and that advice has been wrong

All the time i imagine all the happy relationships i could potentially fuck up with malevolent advice and enjoy myself while at it.
Sokrates   
13 Feb 2009
Love / Polish women are known for their beauty, but men are so ugly (most of).. [250]

This might be heretical but after spending some years in Poland, I'm not convinced Polish women are that stunning. Sure there are some good ones out there, even a few beauties but when I visited the UK the other Summer, I actually found myself looking at English women from a fresh perspective.

English women and "fresh" in one sentence ? Puhhleeeease.

Open the discussion

Simple, we are the missing link.

It should be forbidden ugly men with shorts and t-shirts without sleaves to walk next to beautifuls girls....

God you're a jealous little cunt aint ya :)
Sokrates   
5 Feb 2009
History / Any apologies about Sikorski's 'murder'? [95]

Yes we have discussed this already. Funny how you don't mention that Polish historians call the Polish-Ukrainian war "the last civilised conflict". But then you've got very little to say about how the Poles stabbed their ally in the back and nicked half the country.

I love your racist bullshit, polish territory won back from Ukraine, good argument there you anti-polish trash :)
Sokrates   
4 Feb 2009
History / Any apologies about Sikorski's 'murder'? [95]

I love your line about not a single ship moving. Would that be how you explain 518 British sailors being killed on 14 September 1939 alone? And your claim does somewhat fly in the face of the order issued by the Admiralty on 24 August 1939.

Proof please ?

No doubt a keen military brain such as yours knows what happens when surface ships face land-based bomber aircraft. If not, read up on what happened to HMS Prince of Wales. Now explain why it would have been such a good idea for the British navy to have sailed into confines of the Baltic and its long coastline filled with German airbases.

What land based bomber aircraft ? The ones busy in Poland ?

Poles like you tend to make me think that Britain’s mistake was not entering WWII but the side on which she entered.

I know you're a neo nazi Harry its not a shame ... wait it is :)

I still need an answer why are you on our forum, you're an anti-polish troll ;]
Sokrates   
4 Feb 2009
History / Any apologies about Sikorski's 'murder'? [95]

Please stop with the lies. The Agreement of Mutual Assistance between the United Kingdom and Poland which was signed in London on 25 August 1939 contained no such commitment at all. Read it for yourself

All the support and assistance in its power, we're talking six battleships with their battlegroups in the vicinity, we're talking aircraft carriers which could sit in the Baltic and aid coastal efforts, we're talking all german shipping sunk or confined to its harbors, instead not a single ship was moved, i understand you hate Poland and will generally discuss against it but the fact is that the aid UK could have given was huge and instead it sat on its ass twiddling its thumbs.

You mean the one written while he was awaiting execution and was translated by none other than David Irving? I'm sure that that is reliable.

Irving simply recorded his auto-biography but if you really want why not read Speers memoirs in which he explicitly states that Hitler remarked that he doesnt want war with Britain but "sooner or later it would have to be put down".

Germany would fight and defeat Britain after it was done in the mainland, you can scream that its unreliable all you want but two of Hitlers inner ring claim so and their word holds over yours.

There were no Polish held harbors or naval bases after the first week of September. Attacks against German ports were started within two hours of war being declared. And do stop with the lies about what the British navy was supposed to do according to the treaty.

There werent ? So Hel penninsula which defended for 5 weeks and could accept shipping is what ?

And do stop with the lies about what the British navy was supposed to do according to the treaty.

It was supposed to give all aid possible as soon as possible, it gave no aid at all, there's no lies here, just truth you're uncomfortable with.

Why don't you tell us what the mighty Polish navy did? Their four best ships ran away from the fight even before the war started. Go read about the Pekin Plan and how Poland's naval heroes legged it to the safety of a British port before even a shot was fired anywhere.

Given that polish navy consisted of 8 light ships they could either suicide themselves against german navy which operated 9 cruisers alone in the area or join the Brits.

Britain risked nothing in a naval engangement, they were infinitely more powerfull and could easily strangle any shipping, raze coastal bases to the ground and even liberate coastal cities like Gdynia or Gdańsk without Germans being able to do anything.

I repeat, you hate Poland and spit venom at every possible turn but the facts are irrefutable, despite having massive resources and capacity to help, despite being bound by a treaty that stated any and all aid available will be given England did not fire a shot, that is called betrayal.
Sokrates   
4 Feb 2009
History / Any apologies about Sikorski's 'murder'? [95]

Do stop with the lies. The UK did not refuse to attack Germany and it was under no obligation to do so anyway. Read the treaty in question and you might not sound like a complete moron.

According to the treaty France was to begin the offensive operations within 3 weeks while England was to begin offensive fleet operations within the first seven days, neither did anything, learn history before you start tossing meat.

England was most certainly not next. The Nazi focus was on the East and building a vast empire there, not on fighting with fellow Aryan nations.

How about you stop that uneducated bullshit right now and not make yourself a complete fool ? Read Keitels biography, he states quite clearly that Hitler "would love Britain as long as it suited him but in the end it would not be allowed to remain".

The guy was in the inner ring of Hitlers supporters, if he's saying so i take his word over the word of a random uneducated guy.

Despite your masterly summation, the Nazi regime did not need war “to roll”. Read a little about what the Nazis actually wanted and you might learn something.

Yes it did, everyone expected war and wanted war, the Nazi regime was not capable of maintaining itself without an external enemy, also Hitler didnt just want "Germania" he wanted to be the sole power on the old continent ( again Keitels bio by prof Janson ) and as such would go to war with Britain sooner than later and without Russia to drain away Nazi resources England would be utterly crushed.

As is traditional at these times, I will ask the question that no Pole has ever answered, despite many being asked it: what would you like the UK to have done in September/October 1939 that it did not do?

Use its fleet to shell German harbors and attack both the merchant and military shipping on the baltic, establish a naval link with polish held harbors and naval bases and start offloading troops which is what it was supposed to do according to the treaty it signed.

Not a single ship even fired at a german vessel.
Sokrates   
4 Feb 2009
History / Any apologies about Sikorski's 'murder'? [95]

In but one example...you obviously do not know of Britain's S.O.E help for Poland in training of cichociemni special force paratroops of the Polish underground army

Wait you mean a training camp with a few shacks is helping Poland ?

Britain also gave safe haven for the Polish-government-in-exile which it did not have to.

Given that the polish goverment became the goverment in exile because France and England refused to attack Germany as they were obliged thats not really help, more of a result of earlier negligence.

Remembering also that Hitler did not want a war with Britain at all....Hitler admired the British..a small nation which had built and administered a vast empire which is what the Nazis wanted for tehmselves in Eastern Europe and Europea Russia.

And then came Churchill who understood Hitler much better than you and knew that whatever Hitler wanted or not was a momentary sentiment, regimes that thrive on war do not stop, ever.

England was next and everyone with a brain to them knew it, thats why they didnt surrender.

The fact is the Nazis made numerous advances for a peace with Britain which it declined in order to support its ally Poland

Again rubbish, England turned Hitlers peace offer down because they understood that once Russia is destroyed there will be nothing stoping Hitler from hanging a swastika from Buckingham Palace, Hitler claimed he didnt want war with Britain but lets face it Nazi regime needed war to roll and guess who's the natural enemy once Russia is gone ?

UK didnt fight for others, it fought for itself.

In fact one could argue that the Polish-government-in-exile did not help Poland as it was divided by factional in-fighting of political self-interest which ultimately led to its own abandonment by the western allies.

Divided between whom ? 90% of ethnic Poles supported the exiled goverment and the home army, you might be referring to the peoples battalions which were a tiny fringe organization and grew only when the Soviets arrived, there was no division in Poland untill it was enforced by the Russians and received an approving nod from Britain.

Both Britain and France turned out to be absolutely useless allies, first failing to provide any military help whatsoever and then selling Poland out at every possible turn, they did help a few odd groups of soldiers but by and large there was no political or military help for Poland.

They first watched Poland fall and then sold it out, repeatedly.
Sokrates   
4 Feb 2009
History / Any apologies about Sikorski's 'murder'? [95]

because it may be good for you to see that poland isn't all that? just a though.

I 'know' its not all that i live here.

when england finally decided that it ought to then the americans didn't help.

England or western allies in general never helped Poland during WW 2 unless we're talking about equiping polish units which was really just helping themselves, apart from that Poland never received any help whatsoever.
Sokrates   
3 Feb 2009
History / Any apologies about Sikorski's 'murder'? [95]

UK has a pretty large stash of documents regarding Sikorsky, its possible that there's something about his death there, they implied they'd release them early but then changed their mind, off the top of my head its still 70 or 80 years before they disclose them, why ? No idea.
Sokrates   
3 Feb 2009
History / Any apologies about Sikorski's 'murder'? [95]

Probably because Britain did help Poland. Britain didn't just stab her ally in the back and steal half her country (as Poland had done to her ally in the war she had most recently fought).

How did Britain help Poland ?

One might venture to observe that in 1943 the whole German nation firmly believed that Jews were untermenschen and so you think that the idea might hold some merit, but I wouldn't care to venture that observation myself.

However while there is no basis to the theory that Jews are subhuman there's lots of facts supporting the claim that allies bent Poland over and fucked her raw.

Somebody should post the truth now and again, even if the society doesn't want to face up to that particular truth.

Its reasonable to suspect that Sikorski was murdered, he was a very uncomfortable person for many, its not reasonable however to say Brits did it, it could be anyone, Russians, Americans, Brits, lots of people saw his death as good business.

The only thing that was proven was that he wasnt killed outside the plane crash, the crash itself might well have been engineered, by whom ? We may find out if UK ever discloses the documents regarding the case.
Sokrates   
3 Feb 2009
History / Polish Jews - they changed their Jewish surnames to Polish [532]

You wrote recently that according to Polish IPN reports 90% of all NKVD were Jewish...therefore why would there be no Jewish NKVD involved at Katyn? Were they excluded? Why? If as you say Jews made up 90% of NKVD would they therefore have no influence to have been involved in this crime as well?

Quite simple, soviet high command tried to keep it a secret, most officers involved directly in the executions were from the ass end of Russia rather than locao population.

Stretching the bounds on reason somewhat I think you would agree?

Not at all, all it takes is having an education instead of having an opinion.

On what factual basis do you make such a claim? How many and which crimes are you referring to?

polonica.net/Polski_Holocaust.htm

Thats an online example, professors Rawicki "Zapomniana wojna" is one of many publications i could commend.

As for which crimes ? The rounding up and executions of all higher classes citizen in Eastern Poland, aiding NKVD in finding escaped officers, being directly responsible for ethnic cleansing of at least serveral settlements ( Naliboki rings the bell ) ?

The scope of jewish crimes against Poles far outstretches any crimes done to them by the polish, where in case of Poland these were rare singular cases Jews took it upon themsevles to murer polish citizens in an organized and mass manner enthusiastically taking part in it while under protection of the Soviet Russia.

Solomon Morel whom Israel harbored alone killed more Polish people than all Jews killed by Poles between 1939 and 1945, the number of victims is still rising and that was ONE Jew and he wasnt even the most notorious or effective.
Sokrates   
3 Feb 2009
History / Poland war propaganda poster - can anyone explain this picture? [292]

has nothing to do with what I said, again, your off your rocker

You accuse me of hypocricy in relation to my statements in the other topic hence i bring it up, its not my fault that you're daft enough not to notice.

your picking at a german.. debating , accusing him, yet you accuse jews of capitalizing
but your not any different if you can cast a stone, you should be able to take it.

Personally i dont want any german money other than that earned doing honest work, what Germans did to us can be washed down only with the blood of german people, given that thats impossible its best to forget and move on.

anyway, im out of here.. good luck on your problems, maybe we will all chip in and
get you a therapists.. :)

Done trolling ?
Sokrates   
3 Feb 2009
History / Poland war propaganda poster - can anyone explain this picture? [292]

But I think Germany could be a bit more push for our own interests...as do all countries want, don't they!

At the moment you manage to piss all over your own interest by putting yourself at the wims of Russia.

I'm a conqueror now???
How? Do you drive a german car???

Actually i do and its not stolen either.
Sokrates   
3 Feb 2009
History / Poland war propaganda poster - can anyone explain this picture? [292]

who are you capitalizing on now sokrate? who are you laying some guilt on over there?

Jews inform and instill guilt into all nations worldwide, nations that have no direct connection with holocaust.

Todays Germany is made up of sons and grandsons of murderers and barbarians who destroyed our country beyond belief, i see no analogy.

the word HYPOKRITE comes to mind.

The word spelling comes to mind and its spelled hypocrite.

"pushing under one's weight" is not exactly "dominating"....
You can't have Germany both ways....or can you?

Its a more subtle way but please tell me oh great conqueror what is your weight ? What place in Europe would be fitting and deserving for your great country ?
Sokrates   
3 Feb 2009
History / Poland war propaganda poster - can anyone explain this picture? [292]

But you talked about Germany dominating, remember??? Not about us "pushing under our weight"...!

I've adressed that one as well with Merkel pulling off her stunt.

Also please dont play semantics, your weight equals total domination which typically is fought off, by now the smarter of your elites realised that would lead to eventual destruction of your country so you're trying to dominate more subtly via EU.

You are obviously not stupid do not play semantic games with me since you know exactly what am i writing or is my english not clear enough ?
Sokrates   
3 Feb 2009
History / Poland war propaganda poster - can anyone explain this picture? [292]

Europeans biggest, most wealthy, most industrious people, the biggest european economy....don't you think that Germany instead pushes FAR UNDER their weight?

Personally ? I think that the fact that you push far under your weight is the only reason why you as people still biologically physically exist, one more world war effort on your part and Europe would make sure you are gone forever ( the russian-american political struggle was the only thing that saved you from Morgenthaus plan last time ) so i'd call it more of a survival instinct than pushing under your weight.

allowing european midgets to get the limelights
and disrupting german plans?

Are we talking about Poland disrupting your idiotic Nord Stream which will put Europe in complete dependency of Russia ? Neither are we a midget nor is your plan smart and because of our location we will always be the limelight of the eastern Europe like you will be of the western.

Shoving lotsa money your way?

Given that most of our predicaments are your fault i cant really consider this as giving us money rather than repaying us for the mess you directly and indirectly shoved us into.

You call that "dominating"?

Yes i call Angela Merkel demanding support of Nord Stream dominating, not only is this an utterly idiotic idea given the instability in Russia but it pisses on the welfare of the entire Europe including Germany and yet mrs Merkel has the audacity to 'demand' support.