News /
March of Tolerance in Krakow [478]
yo, hey, z_man, you kinda forfeited on our last exchange. No big deal I suppose as this latest of yours is of much more interest to me.
sorry about that, the number of responses was has been overwhelming so I must have missed yours.
I think the findings you posted are quite interesting but they don't appear to be actually proven, just a hypothetical cause. Anyway let's make like their theory (if it is in fact a theory) is spot on and homosexuality is "abnormal." So is blindness, so is being born with a number of abnormalities, what conclusion(s) do you draw from this then?
It sure is a theory, based on research, not the bible or ACLU charter. As for the conclusions I draw - there is a body of research that shows what has always seemed logical to me: homosexuality is a biologically abnormal state. That's all.
Isn't this thread about being tolerant of differences?
Yes, it is. But if homosexuality is normal in all aspect then:
1. why do we have to prove that the difference is of the same nature as, for instance, that between a blond and a brunette?
2. Why should we even discuss tolerance towards someone who doesn't display biologically abnormal behavior?
Unfortunately you do have to argue in the social sphere to define your concept and advance your theory.
Conclusion based on purely biological grounds may be very beneficial to the whole issue. Consider AIDS. They used to call it gay's disease. Biology has proven there is no special relation between homosexuality and HIV. This has been beneficial for gays in the society, and by extension for those infected with the virus.
Along the lines of grethomory's post, if there is a proof that homosexuality is an abnormality of the genetic code then the bible thumpers are screwed. They can no longer claim homosexuality is a choice of lifestyle. Moreover, one could potentially blame their gods for creating what they criticize. A little speech to that effect could touch upon the beauty of all of god's creations ;)