Yes, I am. And let me see if you are. :):):) What Polish words were once used in the past to check the national identity of disguised guys and differentiate them from real Poles? Say these words now...... :):):):):):):)
What are you driving at, no more pills for you today!
And here is where disagreement lies because I think the opposite. And fortunately Polish political elites share this opinion.
That my point those "elites" look only for their interest they don't give dam about polish, ukrainian or whomever except their own scum.
Poland should support the independent ones, that`s obvious.
Is it? If Nathans views are some indication of nationalistic Ukrainians views as soon as they get their act together they will demand border on the San River because some forefather of Shevchenko used to shag sheep there. (not you Big Golden Sheep lol).
Thank you for this informative remark. :):):):)
I give you tit for tat .
Not 20 years but 600 years from 14 to 20 century.
Yeah and you remember them all!?
It is because I am in contact with you. :):):):):):)
Open your mind pawian, contact with me can be only beneficial for the lesser mind.
BTW, the same Stalin gave Poland Western lands, in case you forgot.
Ups ! truly? I bet Germans didn't forget about it!!!
What Polish rights are you talking about?
You don't know?You should educated yourself before you start forming opinions based on your ignorance.
I guessed it from your posts. :):):):):):)
You must be polish part of the family Nathan was talking about the same empty answers - without value ! No more med for you pawian !))0
At the end of a long battle for the city, elements of victorious Polish soldiery went back into certain streets and massacred inhabitants. An estimated 340 innocent people were killed. About 2/3 of them were Ukrainians. The remaining 70 or so were Jews.
Oh yes **** happens, so if I will find out that
Even if I am an agent of a foreign power, I am Polish and I am talking about matters which are vital to Poland. What about you? :):):):)
Polish you may be but I can say there two kind of Poles those with mentality and roots (I suppose)in servitude - serfs and free.
For some time I was attributing those differences to communist rule when they were tailoring education and mind of young pupils at the some time to suite Moscow plans and needs but lately I change my mind.
Anyone with only reading skills can find the way to think and act as a free man and proud patriot but prevent it can only lobotomy or genetics.
Descendent's of serfs are my half baked theory to explain phenomena of noninflected servitude - I bet many people will be happy!
Look at my stereotypes in the railway map. :):):):)
Look pawian what it proves - it proves you utter ignorance and lack of understading the isuue, your stereotypes should be only yours but you are proud of them and your ignorance.
Well, argument to the point and concise (Nathan and pawian read and learn):
Those railways prove nothing as first engine was built in England in 1836 more or less and most of the track were build from 1846 to 1914 when Poland did not exist as a independent state. Therefore couldn't build any infrastructure in the modern meaning of the word.
It was even worse in Ukraine. Despite partitions, Poles controlled economy in Galicia all the time. .
Sure you know that or you think that if latter let me tell you, that you are not dam good at it, you poor sod!
No nobility?? So, who owned land in Galicia after 1918??
Owners, you telling that only nobility owed the land?
strong weed man))))
First of all, during Austrian partition Poles in Galicia region had advanced autonomy. They governed such branches as economy, culture and education. Also, Poles took part in the main Austrian government, twice a Prime Minister was Polish.
The Austrio Hungarian Empire was a state and galicia was a part of the state and autonomy started in 1867, as for being part of the government - so what ?
Do you think that a fact that Obama is black will have a great impact on the situation of the American blacks? Not at all!
Lviv was Ukrainian from the beginning when it was built by Ukrainian king Danylo Halickij for his son Lew (this is the reason the city was named like that) in 1256.
Well, dear Nathan I know all that except
occupied
part which is pure interpretation and not the true.
I was study this border question with care and consideration searching for the true, without prejudice to the heart of the issue - so believe me I know what I'm talking about!
Lwów was bulid by Rutheanian king Daniel, so what ?
His scions died out and the closed family member which happen to be king Kazimierz inherited his land, since then it is part of the Crown.
Where is the Ruthenian state, kingdom, county anything ?
Nope, null, zero or maybe Moscow the closest to Rusyn state as it goes but under the Tatar yoke ?
Face the true Nathan and stop make a fool of yourself, you are in the denial!