PolishForums LIVE  /  Archives [3]    
 
Archives - 2005-2009 / History  % width300

Russia: Poland responsible for WW II


Ironside  50 | 12335  
13 Jun 2009 /  #91
since I don't like to waste my precious time just look above what I wrote to sOKRATES, you guys can share my answer, you both deserve it to the same extent.

Listen kid, are 21 ?
If you are older than that I suggest instead of reading history books , hunting or fishing.
You simply are not good.

Gdansk? Whats your point?Be precise and concise, because up to now you are not making much sense.
freebird  3 | 532  
13 Jun 2009 /  #92
it was built by Poles and inhabited by a Polish majority for over six centuries

nope, both wrong

that i've provided reliable sources

I did too and mine are more convincing to me and few others here too

Its ok freebird you're just a biased uneducated redneck

yep, redneck from NYC, lmao. You're an pathetic moron.

Gdansk? Whats your point?Be precise and concise, because up to now you are not making much sense.

I was very specific and presented historical facts which you don't like, your problem. You see, none of you (neither you or sokrates) is man enough to agree at least to that one, that your (what you believe, no doubt) truth might be not true. You don't even try to go that far because what you're convinced about is whatever is Polish IS automatically the truth and this is also a reason why you Poles are being ignored so often.
Nathan  18 | 1349  
13 Jun 2009 /  #93
the confirmed archeologica fact that we built it.

What kind of archeology can show that the city was built by Poles. They found "Gazeta Wyborcza" there or something?

inhabited by a Polish majority for over six centuries

Poles are majority of Danzig, maybe, 300 years at best. The rest of the time it was Germans who made up the bulk of the population.
Ironside  50 | 12335  
13 Jun 2009 /  #94
I was very specific and presented historical facts which you don't like, your problem. You see, none of you (neither you or sokrates) is man enough to agree at least to that one, that your (what you believe, no doubt) truth might be not true. You don't even try to go that far because what you're convinced about is whatever is Polish IS automatically the truth and this is also a reason why you Poles are being ignored so often.

Well, a lot of worlds to tell me no....
You said something but I don't care to look over all your posts.
And for last time, you weren't discussing Gdansk with me!
I was only chiding you for your attitude and sweeping generalizations about Poles and Polish history.
Want debate give me material not your opinions about bad Poles are.......!
If you don't then don't!

What kind of archeology can show that the city was built by Poles. They found "Gazeta Wyborcza" there or something?

Sonny, what do you know about archeology?)))))

Poles are majority of Danzig, maybe, 300 years at best. The rest of the time it was Germans who made up the bulk of the population.

Really ? Ukrainians never were majority in Lwów!!!!
freebird  3 | 532  
13 Jun 2009 /  #95
300 years at best

not even to that time the spoken language in Danzig was Polish
Nathan  18 | 1349  
13 Jun 2009 /  #96
True. Even occupied it spoke German predominantly.

Really ? Ukrainians never were majority in L'viv!!!!

I know, Wonderlandian inhabited most of the time.
Seanus  15 | 19666  
13 Jun 2009 /  #97
Ironside, objective history states that 997 AD was the year of formation of what is now called Gdańsk, true?
Bratwurst Boy  8 | 11710  
13 Jun 2009 /  #98
I wonder why they didn't renovate the old beautiful "polish style" of Danzig instead the old hanseatic german style Bürgerhäuser to get tourists in to the town?

allgdansktours.com/tours/gdansk-royal-way.php

...A walk along this storied path begins at the Upland (or Highland) Gate, first built in the 16th century by the renowned Saxon, Hans Kramer, as part of Gdansk’s outer walls.
...

(What is "polish style" actually?)

Danzig had a population of 98 percent Germans till 1945, was the birth town of many famous Germans and has a renown german architecture!
(And even before some Poles put a sign in the soil some Goth pissed on it BEFORE)

To ignore the german past of Danzig and make it to "it has always been polish" is just not true (outside of Poland that is).

But then...my remark stands..."There are two different kinds of histories, the polish version and everybody elses!"

:)
Seanus  15 | 19666  
13 Jun 2009 /  #99
Bolesław I Chrobry came with soldiers with the support of Adalbert. Hardcore Christians maintain that this Czech bishop, who was subsequently canonised, baptised the city and formed it in 997 AD. What most sources fail to mention is that their efforts to overcome the Prussians failed. I believe he tried again in 1015 and failed until the Teutonic Knights took over in the Prussian Crusade in the 1200's.
freebird  3 | 532  
13 Jun 2009 /  #100
the polish version and everybody elses!"

:)

yep, obviously it must be so.

I mean c'mon they got the city now, why the hell is it so hard to admit that before 1945 it wasn't Polish?
Also to say that Danzig was built by the Poles. All it takes is to look at the list of the famous names in Danzigs history. The only one I found that sounds Polish is Daniel Chodowiecki but even he claimed to be both German and Polish. The rest of the architects came from Belgium, Holland and Germany.

is that their efforts to overcome the Prussians failed

exactly but I bet our friends "ironside" and "sokrates" will find their ways to deny this fact.
Seanus  15 | 19666  
13 Jun 2009 /  #101
It's the same story as Copernicus. He identified with his German side as much as his Polish side but that isn't acknowledged in Polish sources.
PlasticPole  7 | 2641  
13 Jun 2009 /  #102
I mean c'mon they got the city now, why the hell is it so hard to admit that before 1945 it wasn't Polish?

Germans had enough they didn't need Danzig. It was selfish greed on their behalf to demand it!
Poland needed it to help their struggling economy.
Bratwurst Boy  8 | 11710  
13 Jun 2009 /  #103
It's the same story as Copernicus. He identified with his German side as much as his Polish side but that isn't acknowledged in Polish sources.

And what makes you say that??? Did he told you that? :)

Germans had enough they didn't need Danzig. It was selfish greed on their behalf to demand it!

Well..."they" hardly "demanded" it.
It was the population of Danzig which found themselves suddenly outside of Germany, cut off without any connection, because of some clueless border drawing far away by spiteful foreigners and who wanted nothing else but back home.

How selfish of them!

They mainly voted later for the one man who promised them that!
What about the right of self-determination?
Seanus  15 | 19666  
13 Jun 2009 /  #104
Come on, BB, I said Polish sources. Even suggest that Copernicus is anything less than 100% Polish and they get offended. I've seen it with my own eyes and heard it with my own ears.

Danzig was Prussian for a long time, PP. Look at your historical sources. 997 AD is accepted as the year of its formation. Was it Polish then? Or did Bolesław's army lose and try again in 1015? You tell me. It's not a question of need at all.
Bratwurst Boy  8 | 11710  
13 Jun 2009 /  #105
You tell me.

I don't care actually!
Everybody knows that Poles and Germans in this regions mixed, that borders changed alot, whole towns changed hands back and forth for centuries!

I only object to people who want to scratch out the german centuries in these lands totally.
Next they say the first book printing in Krakau was also done by a Pole and not a German! :)

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Early_printing_in_Poland
freebird  3 | 532  
13 Jun 2009 /  #106
Germans had enough they didn't need Danzig. It was selfish greed on their behalf to demand it!
Poland needed it to help their struggling economy.

oh please girl we're not talking about the needs, we're talking about historical facts. Why would Germans give Danzig to Poland? Just because Poland needed it more? lol. Please tell me you didn't say it. You're otherwise so cute :-)

Even suggest that Copernicus is anything less than 100% Polish and they get offended

very much so, no doubt, lol
PlasticPole  7 | 2641  
13 Jun 2009 /  #107
Danzig was Prussian for a long time, PP. Look at your historical sources. 997 AD is accepted as the year of its formation. Was it Polish then? Or did Bolesław's army lose and try again in 1015? You tell me.

True, but it has a Polish connection too and Poland was in greater need. Otherwise it wouldn't have gone to Poland in the first place.
Seanus  15 | 19666  
13 Jun 2009 /  #108
You are BB, not PP. You have a helmet but I think you now need glasses ;) ;)

So, BB, let's be clear. When can you lay claim to any given territory? At the date of formation or can subsequent events change things? Do you accept 997 AD as the date of formation of Gdańsk? If so, would you apply the same standard to the ME problem between Israel and Palestine?

PP, need? Africans need food and better sanitation but do they get it? The West has milked and leeched off of Africa for a long time. Starving it of key natural resources. Don't the Palestinians need a place to stay? Don't refugees need safety from NATO bombs? America orchestrated a battering policy to make Yugoslavia needy. Is this the kind of example you want to set?
Bratwurst Boy  8 | 11710  
13 Jun 2009 /  #109
Poland was in greater need. Otherwise it wouldn't have gone to Poland in the first place.

And what about the Germans populating the town?
What about their needs?
freebird  3 | 532  
13 Jun 2009 /  #110
Otherwise it wouldn't have gone to Poland in the first place

do you mean after the WWII? Look PlasticPole, the town was practically German. The population (according to wiki. I know different numbers too) was 95.3% German and 3.28% Kashubians and Masurians, which to the high extent also claimed to be Germans.
Bratwurst Boy  8 | 11710  
13 Jun 2009 /  #111
Do you accept 997 AD as the date of formation of Gdańsk?

Of course I accept the date if it's mainstream knowledge.
But I just wonder what the Poles did all this time in "their town"?
The list of polish famous people from Danzig is quite...erm...short...
What about the architecture?
Even if the Poles founded Danzig their imprint on this town is really small!
PlasticPole  7 | 2641  
13 Jun 2009 /  #112
And what about the Germans populating the town?
What about their needs?

What's the worse that could of happened? Sure they would have been under a Polish flag but could it have been that bad if everyone cooperated?
Bratwurst Boy  8 | 11710  
13 Jun 2009 /  #113
What's the worse that could of happened?

You don't know much about the history of these lands, don't you?
Astounding that you have still such a firm judgement
about all.
Poles and Germans weren't the best neighbours in those times. In short they hated each other. Polish policy against all minorities wasn't much better than the later Adolfs ones.

The Polish government wanted to force the Germans to take on polish citizenship or to leave...a forerunner of the later ethnic cleansing.
If you were a German and wanted nothing else but BACK HOME, would you just say..."Hey...who cares...now I'm polish...doesn't matter..."?

No, you wouldn't!
The same as Poles still wanted their own country and wanted to stay Poles during their partitions.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_City_of_Danzig#Population

"Free city" my a*ss:

...It was placed under League of Nations "protection", with special economic-related rights reserved for Poland.[1]
The city was denied self-determination, despite the majority of German-speaking citizens calling for a reunion with Germany....

Seanus  15 | 19666  
13 Jun 2009 /  #114
Good point by BB. Is America now Spanish or Portuguese? NOPE! So, BB, you accept 997 AD as the formation date. Did Mieszko I's son (Bolesław I Chrobry) defeat the Prussians in either 997 AD or 1015 AD?

PP, why does it matter so much to you? Look at James Baker who said that the US could "never" be the world's policeman. 10 years later, he was made to swallow his words.
Bratwurst Boy  8 | 11710  
13 Jun 2009 /  #115
Good point by BB. Is America now Spanish or Portuguese? NOPE!

???
PlasticPole  7 | 2641  
13 Jun 2009 /  #116
The Polish government wanted to force the Germans to take on polish citizenship or to leave...a forerunner of the later ethnic cleansing.

Why not take on Polish citizenship? Why is it such a big deal anyway? With a little diplomacy it would have been a non issue.

If the city belongs to Poland there has to be some kind of compromise. They have to take the citizenship because they are in Poland. I don't see it as being unreasonable when you put it in context with the policies of other nations.

Seanus, there you go again. We aren't the world's policeman. We didn't police the Danzig situation. It just happened :P
Can't blame us!
Bratwurst Boy  8 | 11710  
13 Jun 2009 /  #117
Why not take on Polish citizenship? Why is it such a big deal anyway? With a little diplomacy it would have been a non issue.

Are you kidding???

If the city belongs to Poland there has to be some kind of compromise. They have to take the citizenship because they are in Poland.

They didn't BELONG to Poland! That's the crux of the matter...
They got one evening to bed as Germans in Germany and woke up as a minority in a new hostile country! Just like that! Without their doing or fault!

And you just shrug and say..."get used to it"???
Are you really that thick???
Why weren't your Poles satisfied with being under prussian or austrian rule one could ask the same!
PlasticPole  7 | 2641  
13 Jun 2009 /  #118
It's not a matter of who speaks what language anyway. If ownage was decided on language alone, half the US would belong to Mexico :P
freebird  3 | 532  
13 Jun 2009 /  #119
What about the architecture?

geez, just go and see yourself all you people who don't believe, whole bunch of German (if not then latin but not Polish tho) writings all over oldtown buildings and that after beautiful Polish restoration after being totally destroyed during the WWII.

What's the worse that could of happened? Sure they would have been under a Polish flag but could it have been that bad if everyone cooperated?

nothing wrong with Polish flag but not for a town populated almost only by the Germans.

Poles and Germans weren't the best neighbours in those times

let's be honest about, almost never

half the US would belong to Mexico

not even close but a nice try lol

PlasticPole, are you as pretty as you sound? I just wonder :-)
PlasticPole  7 | 2641  
13 Jun 2009 /  #120
nothing wrong with Polish flag but not for a town populated almost only by the Germans.

It doesn't matter if Germans occupy the town. Would you give LA to Mexico because of all the Mexicans who speak Spanish? Who lives there isn't really an issue if you compare it to other countries and their policies in such matters. With your logic US would give Houston to Mexico.

PlasticPole, are you as pretty as you sound? I just wonder :-)

That sounds like a trick question.

Archives - 2005-2009 / History / Russia: Poland responsible for WW IIArchived