isthatu wrote:
Im sorry,I didnt realise you had served in the US army in the last war........
Don't know what you mean by that mate?
in reply to your derogatory term,
i think the Krauts would have won the war!
normally,and exclusivly used by our late arriving cousins from accross the sea, "we" british prefering such nom de guerre for the enemy as " jerry" or possibly the older ,last war era "hun".
I think you've given in to modern day morality!
I hope not, more the old fashioned morality of the Geneva and Hague conventions Britain was a signatory of stating the plain fact that Bombings of civilians was to be viewed as a war crime in any future wars. Goering was to be hung, yet Harris was applauded(infact,he wasnt,he was thankfully shunned post war for being a vicious psychopath).
The cities were military targets
Yes, you keep telling yourself,then look at the actual written record of the RAF and USAAF targeting criteria,namely, did it burn well,and would it cause terror to a large civilian population.
I think the crux of your arguent seems to be ," The nazis did it,so why cant "we"?", which,no offense,seems a little flawed,if not morraly bankrupt.